OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC2)
Quote:
Surprisingly, much of the most glaring errors contained in the report could be attributed to a simple failure to verify the accuracy of the source data.
A) Surprisingly, much of the most glaring errors contained in the report could be attributed to a simple failure to verify
B) Surprisingly, much of the more glaring errors contained in the report could be attributed to a simple failure to verify
C) Surprisingly, many of the more glaring errors contained in the report can be attributed to a simple failure of verifying
D) Surprisingly, many of the most glaring errors contained in the report could be attributed to a simple failure to verify
E) Surprisingly, many of the most glaring errors contained in the report is attributable to a simple failure to verify
• Split #1: MANY vs. MUCHErrors are countable.
We use
many with countable nouns: Many bodies of water are landlocked.
We use
much with uncountable nouns: Much of the water is drinkable.
Options A and B incorrectly use
much to describe
errors.
ELIMINATE A and B
• Split #2: SUBJECT/VERB agreementMany is a plural quantifier (also called a "determiner") on the GMAT and in 99 percent of all writing.
Correct:
Many . . . errors . . . areOption E incorrectly states:
. . . many . . . errors . . . is(
Many is singular when followed by an indefinite article and a singular noun:
Many a man has been captivated by her smile. → That usage is literary, somewhat archaic, and rare.)
ELIMINATE E
• Split #3: Option C v. D→ →
failure to verify in (D) is better than
failure of verifying in (C)
All native speakers should cringe when they read
failure of verifying.The phrase is not idiomatic. In context, the phrase is a stylistic disaster.
The noun is an awkward gerund (verbING), but even the dedicated noun (failure of verification) would not be good.
Failure to X is more active and forceful than
failure of Xing.
UsageTo describe something that should have been done but was not, use
failure to verb.
→
Her failure to comply with the dress code was predictable.(Not
Her failure of compliance/complying with the dress code...)
→
The elected officials' failure to uphold the Constitution will come back to haunt them politically.(Not
The officials failure of upholding the Constitution...)
→
My failure to read the instructions resulted in a hot mess.(Not
My failure of reading the instructions...)
To describe a missing
noun or the lack of a noun, use
failure of noun.
→
The delay in vaccine distribution was caused by a failure of leadership.→
Ridiculous and disproven conspiracy theories display not overactive imagination but rather failure of imagination.Option D is better than option C.
ELIMINATE C
The best answer is D. Notes→ I would not eliminate C because it uses "the more glaring errors," although I would let it "tilt" the balance for me towards D.
When
more is used with
the and a descriptor, the phrase itself implies two groups (and perhaps two groupings on a spectrum).
→
The more experienced soldiers planned the escape. (The less experienced soldiers did not plan the escape.)
→
More educated citizens tend to skew polls because they answer such polls frequently [whereas less educated citizens answer polls less frequently]. "The more glaring" implicitly creates two groups of errors: those that are more and less glaring.
The construction is not wrong, but I recall having seen only one or two official questions in which "the more _____" was used this way.
Google these words with the quotation marks and scroll down to the "regular" sections:
"the more experienced" new york times
EDIT: "contained" is a past participle, not a simple past tense verb.
Contained is part of a reduced relative clause, this way:
. . . many of the errors [that are/were] contained in the report [can/could] be attributed to a simple failure to verify ... COMMENTSAnkitHRD ,
sudeshpatodiya , and
chiragarora001 , welcome to SC Butler.
I'm a little under the weather, so I'll keep this short.
I'm glad to have such a diverse crew. It's always good to see newcomers, occasional visitors, veterans, and stalwarts.
These answers range from very good to excellent. Kudos to all.