Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 May 2017, 21:26

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Take a very commonplace, often discussed and critical topic:

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 194
Location: Prague
Schools: University of Economics Prague
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 15

Take a very commonplace, often discussed and critical topic: [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2011, 07:43
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Question 1
00:00

Question Stats:

50% (03:41) correct 50% (00:56) wrong based on 22

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

Question Stats:

43% (01:54) correct 57% (00:18) wrong based on 21

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00

Question Stats:

50% (01:17) correct 50% (00:59) wrong based on 20

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00

Question Stats:

50% (04:16) correct 50% (02:55) wrong based on 20

### HideShow timer Statistics

Take a very commonplace, often discussed and critical topic: Are we detecting a greenhouse effect, and related to this, is it exacerbated by "homogenic factors," i.e., human actions? Most would be inclined to give a positive answer to both of these questions. But, if pushed, what would be the evidence, and how well grounded would it be for such affirmations?

Within scientific communities and associated scientifically informed circles, the answers have to be somewhat more ambiguous, particularly when rigorous questions concerning evidence are raised. Were scientific truth to be a matter of consensus, and some argue that scientific truth often turns out to be just that, then it is clear that there is beginning to be a kind of majority consensus among many earth science practitioners that the temperature of the Earth, particularly of the oceans, is indeed rising and that this is a crucial indicator for a possible greenhouse effect.

Most of these scientists admit that the mean oceanic temperature has risen globally in the last several decades. But this generalization depends upon how accurate measurements may be, not just for samples, but also for the whole Earth. Hot spots, for example the now four year old hot spot near New Guinea which is part of the El Niño cycle, does not count by itself because it might be balanced by cold spots elsewhere. And the fact of the matter is that "whole earth measurements" are still rare and primitive in the simple sense that we simply do not have enough thermometers out. Secondly, even if we had enough thermometers, a simply synchronic whole earth measurement over three decades is but a blip in the diachronic history of ice age cycles over the last tens of thousands of years. Thirdly, even if we know that the earth is now heating up, has an ever increasing ozone hole, and from this strange weather effects can be predicted, how much of this is due to homogenic factors, such as CFCs, CO2 increases, hydrocarbon burning, and the like? Is it really the case, as Science magazine claimed in l990, "24% of greenhouse encouraging gases are of homogenic origin"?
17. In this passage the author is primarily interested in
(A) Whether scientific truths are simply a matter of consensus
(B) Determining how well established the greenhouse effect is and to what degree it is worsened by human actions
(C) Whether the hot spot El Niño is balanced elsewhere by cold spots
(D) Determining if most scientists would be inclined to give a positive answer to the question of whether there is a greenhouse effect and if it is worsened by human actions
(E) Making a simple synchronic whole earth measurement more than a blip in the diachronic history of Ice Age cycles over the last tens of thousands of years.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
B

18. The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about the greenhouse effect?
(A) 24% of greenhouse encouraging gases are of homogenic origin.
(B) There is a greenhouse effect that is exacerbated by homogenic factors.
(C) The ozone hole is increasing due to homogenic factors, such as CFCs, CO2 increases, hydrocarbon burning, and the like.
(D) One can determine if mean oceanic temperatures have risen globally in the last several decades only if measurements of ocean temperatures are precise.
(E) Hot spots, such as the El Niño cycle, should not be counted as a factor in the greenhouse effect.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

19. It can be inferred from the passage that
(A) We cannot be certain that strange weather effects are a result of the earth heating up and an ever-increasing ozone hole.
(B) The greenhouse effect is the most widely discussed topic in the scientifically informed circles.
(C) If the temperature of the oceans has ceased to rise at an ever-increasing rate, then the rate of global warming has increased.
(D) Strange weather effects have been shown to be due to the diachronic effects of hydrocarbon burning and not to increases in CFC.
(E) Strange weather effects are caused by the increase use of CFCs, CO2, and similar gasses.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

20. The author’s claim that, a simply synchronic whole earth measurement over three decades is but a blip in the diachronic history of ice age cycles over the last tens of thousands of years would be strengthened if the author
(A) Indicated the minimum number of thermometers necessary for a whole earth measurement.
(B) Described the factors that precipitated the start of a new ice age.
(C) Compare synchronic whole earth measurements with diachronic whole earth measurements.
(D) Proved that the mean number of years required to detect significant changes in weather patterns is greater than thirty.
(E) Specified the exact location and quantity of thermometers placed by scientists around the globe.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #1 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #2 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #3 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #4 OA
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 03 Sep 2010
Posts: 75
Location: Israel
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 2: 670 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE: Operations (Non-Profit and Government)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2011, 13:21
17 B
18 E
19 C
20 B
Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 183
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 78 [1] , given: 118

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2011, 02:50
1
KUDOS
17 B
18 D
19 A
20 D
Intern
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2011, 06:43
17.B
18.E
19.A
20.D

Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 194
Location: Prague
Schools: University of Economics Prague
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 15

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2011, 06:51
You can see the OA below. nikhilsrl hit all correct

17 B
18 D
19 A
20 D
_________________

You want somethin', go get it. Period!

Senior Manager
Status: Happy to join ROSS!
Joined: 29 Sep 2010
Posts: 276
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Ross '14 (M)
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 48

### Show Tags

14 Feb 2011, 23:57
Gents,
I am struggling to chose between 18D/18E. Reading this part:

Most of these scientists admit that the mean oceanic temperature has risen globally in the last several decades. But this generalization depends upon how accurate measurements may be, not just for samples, but also for the whole Earth. Hot spots, for example the now four year old hot spot near New Guinea which is part of the El Niño cycle, does not count by itself because it might be balanced by cold spots elsewhere.

IMHO, against 18D we have the fact that the text mentions 'accuracy not only for samples, but for the whole Earth'
And against 18E we have strong 'should not' in the answer choice...
Manager
Joined: 17 Feb 2011
Posts: 194
Concentration: Real Estate, Finance
Schools: MIT (Sloan) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Followers: 44

Kudos [?]: 730 [0], given: 70

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2011, 09:53
17 B
18 E
19 A
20 D
Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2010
Posts: 92
Location: india
WE 1: 1.3
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 15

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2011, 10:53
17-b
18-d
19-a
20-d
Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 183
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 118

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2011, 23:03
Hello Vorskl,

This is my take on 18.

As per the passage para 3 - "Hot spots, for example the now four year old hot spot near New Guinea which is part of the El Niño cycle, does not count by itself because it might be balanced by cold spots elsewhere". So the author does not say that Hot spots should not be counted, rather it should not be counted by itself, we should also consider other cold spots. For this reason we can cancel 18 E.

As per the passage para 3 - "Most of these scientists admit that the mean oceanic temperature has risen globally in the last several decades. But this generalization depends upon how accurate measurements may be, not just for samples, but also for the whole Earth.". So this supports 18 D.
Intern
Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2011, 19:37
B
D
C
D

Intern
Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Posts: 16
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V41
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2011, 00:58
I don't understand the logic in the 17th OA. The author states that there is no firm evidence to prove that there is a greenhouse effect, doesn't he?
I picked D for 17th.
So can anyone help me solve this particular question?
Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2011, 07:27
MitSuRuGi wrote:
I don't understand the logic in the 17th OA. The author states that there is no firm evidence to prove that there is a greenhouse effect, doesn't he?
I picked D for 17th.
So can anyone help me solve this particular question?

I think the author already mention "Most would be inclined to give a positive answer to both of these questions. But, if pushed, what would be the evidence, and how well grounded would it be for such affirmations?"

The author is not determining.
Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 2005
Concentration: Finance
Followers: 68

Kudos [?]: 643 [1] , given: 355

Re: Take a very commonplace, often discussed and critical topic: [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2013, 12:51
1
KUDOS
craky wrote:
Take a very commonplace, often discussed and critical topic: Are we detecting a greenhouse effect, and related to this, is it exacerbated by "homogenic factors," i.e., human actions? Most would be inclined to give a positive answer to both of these questions. But, if pushed, what would be the evidence, and how well grounded would it be for such affirmations?

Within scientific communities and associated scientifically informed circles, the answers have to be somewhat more ambiguous, particularly when rigorous questions concerning evidence are raised. Were scientific truth to be a matter of consensus, and some argue that scientific truth often turns out to be just that, then it is clear that there is beginning to be a kind of majority consensus among many earth science practitioners that the temperature of the Earth, particularly of the oceans, is indeed rising and that this is a crucial indicator for a possible greenhouse effect.

Most of these scientists admit that the mean oceanic temperature has risen globally in the last several decades. But this generalization depends upon how accurate measurements may be, not just for samples, but also for the whole Earth. Hot spots, for example the now four year old hot spot near New Guinea which is part of the El Niño cycle, does not count by itself because it might be balanced by cold spots elsewhere. And the fact of the matter is that "whole earth measurements" are still rare and primitive in the simple sense that we simply do not have enough thermometers out. Secondly, even if we had enough thermometers, a simply synchronic whole earth measurement over three decades is but a blip in the diachronic history of ice age cycles over the last tens of thousands of years. Thirdly, even if we know that the earth is now heating up, has an ever increasing ozone hole, and from this strange weather effects can be predicted, how much of this is due to homogenic factors, such as CFCs, CO2 increases, hydrocarbon burning, and the like? Is it really the case, as Science magazine claimed in l990, "24% of greenhouse encouraging gases are of homogenic origin"?
17. In this passage the author is primarily interested in
(A) Whether scientific truths are simply a matter of consensus
(B) Determining how well established the greenhouse effect is and to what degree it is worsened by human actions
(C) Whether the hot spot El Niño is balanced elsewhere by cold spots
(D) Determining if most scientists would be inclined to give a positive answer to the question of whether there is a greenhouse effect and if it is worsened by human actions
(E) Making a simple synchronic whole earth measurement more than a blip in the diachronic history of Ice Age cycles over the last tens of thousands of years.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B

18. The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about the greenhouse effect?
(A) 24% of greenhouse encouraging gases are of homogenic origin.
(B) There is a greenhouse effect that is exacerbated by homogenic factors.
(C) The ozone hole is increasing due to homogenic factors, such as CFCs, CO2 increases, hydrocarbon burning, and the like.
(D) One can determine if mean oceanic temperatures have risen globally in the last several decades only if measurements of ocean temperatures are precise.
(E) Hot spots, such as the El Niño cycle, should not be counted as a factor in the greenhouse effect.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

19. It can be inferred from the passage that
(A) We cannot be certain that strange weather effects are a result of the earth heating up and an ever-increasing ozone hole.
(B) The greenhouse effect is the most widely discussed topic in the scientifically informed circles.
(C) If the temperature of the oceans has ceased to rise at an ever-increasing rate, then the rate of global warming has increased.
(D) Strange weather effects have been shown to be due to the diachronic effects of hydrocarbon burning and not to increases in CFC.
(E) Strange weather effects are caused by the increase use of CFCs, CO2, and similar gasses.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

20. The author’s claim that, a simply synchronic whole earth measurement over three decades is but a blip in the diachronic history of ice age cycles over the last tens of thousands of years would be strengthened if the author
(A) Indicated the minimum number of thermometers necessary for a whole earth measurement.
(B) Described the factors that precipitated the start of a new ice age.
(C) Compare synchronic whole earth measurements with diachronic whole earth measurements.
(D) Proved that the mean number of years required to detect significant changes in weather patterns is greater than thirty.
(E) Specified the exact location and quantity of thermometers placed by scientists around the globe.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

Was between 1 B and 1D and picked the wrong one
Also was between 4 A and 4D and again picked the wrong one.

Gees, could someone please share some thoughts on why I messed up?
Will throw some Kudos out there for a nice explanation
Thanks
Cheers,
J
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10365
Followers: 996

Kudos [?]: 223 [0], given: 0

Re: Take a very commonplace, often discussed and critical topic: [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2016, 17:06
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Take a very commonplace, often discussed and critical topic:   [#permalink] 06 Oct 2016, 17:06
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Grassland songbirds often nest 3 16 Apr 2017, 06:37
Already discussed at the below mentioned link 1 22 Jun 2013, 14:30
19 Commonplace items sometimes play surprising roles in world 23 07 Sep 2016, 10:33
10 Commonplace items sometimes play surprising roles in world 18 17 Oct 2015, 21:02
1 Commonplace items sometimes play surprising roles in world 13 01 May 2016, 21:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by