Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 May 2017, 14:10

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 369
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 122 [6] , given: 0

Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2006, 17:54
6
KUDOS
38
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

59% (02:45) correct 41% (01:53) wrong based on 1821 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 54
Page: 138
Difficulty:

Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

The only thing that matters is what you believe.

Last edited by Narenn on 07 Oct 2013, 10:26, edited 2 times in total.
Necessary Corrections for Official Guide Verbal Review 2nd Edition Project
If you have any questions
New!
VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1405
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 187 [1] , given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2006, 19:06
1
KUDOS
I would say D... the argument isn't about the leather, but about the waste the results from the process

A cost comparison is important
B switching equipment is important
C regulations of the new waste type are important
D out
E chemical properties of both are important to consider
Director
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 572
Location: Munich,Germany
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2006, 19:25
freetheking wrote:
Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?

OA later~

C for me.

A -matters because if the cost of using pottasium chloride is higher than salt , then its going to have a higher impact on profits
B- important, because if the equipment is not suitable then the company has to purchase new equipment
D-if the leather quality does not match then it could impact sales
E -could again impact leather quality which would affect sales

C- because it talks about regulations with respect to the by-product of pottasium and not pottasium itself. Had there been concern of environmental regulations about using pottasium then it could be possible that the company might have to spend additional amounts to meet those regulations.
CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2898
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 289 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2006, 19:47
C

A. cost of salt vs KCl (Chemical formula of potassium chloride ) is improtant to gauge the profit
B. Quantity of salt vs KCl is improtant to gauge the profit
D. Quality of leather produced using salt vs KCl is improtant to gauge the profit
E. Chemical properties of salt vs KCl are improtant for the quality of leather
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Posts: 470
Location: united states
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2006, 20:15
C for me as well.. as explained by shahnandan and ps_dahiya.
_________________

for every person who doesn't try because he is
afraid of loosing , there is another person who
keeps making mistakes and succeeds..

Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 242
Location: Italy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2006, 05:27
Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
has to be considered in order to not affect profits

B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride? we should consider this one

C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride? is the one left out so this is my answear

D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used? also this one need to be considered

E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so? has to be assumed we do not whant changements
_________________

â€œIf money is your hope for independence you will never have it. The only real security that a man will have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability.â€

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 369
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 122 [1] , given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2006, 18:59
1
KUDOS
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so

Are we talking about chemical properties??
_________________

The only thing that matters is what you believe.

SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1730
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 82 [2] , given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 00:10
2
KUDOS
Will go with E .

The quality of leather, reuse of existing machines, constrsints on waste disposal and cost of using a different chemical all have some bearing onthe profits of the company.

The chemical properties involved need not be the same.
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 369
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 122 [2] , given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 00:11
2
KUDOS
OA is E
IMO, chemical properties doesn't matter in this case.

_________________

The only thing that matters is what you believe.

Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 13:35
freetheking wrote:
OA is E
IMO, chemical properties doesn't matter in this case.

At first, felt that D is better.. Closer evaluation gives E..
Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Posts: 112
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [1] , given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2006, 10:55
1
KUDOS
E.
Easy pesy
Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2011
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2011, 07:21
Yeah, E seems quite obvious, but why others are wrong, could you explain me?

Because when doing CR, we can't risk of targeting one answer is 100% correct, we need to cancel others in order to make sure the targeted answer is right, don't you think?

The correct answer is E, but why others are wrong???

freetheking wrote:
OA is E
IMO, chemical properties doesn't matter in this case.

Manager
Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Posts: 61
Location: Korea, Republic of
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 08-16-2012
GPA: 3.05
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 89 [3] , given: 37

Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Apr 2012, 18:05
3
KUDOS
Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?

I don't understand the OA.

If chemical properties are considered 'out of topic', isn't 'equipment' from (B) considered 'out of topic' as well?
If Potasium chloride's chemical properties don't work as effective as a common salt, wouldn't that decrease the profit? Because pottasium is not effective, the company should purchase more potassium?

_________________

Luck is the additional surplus on the way to one's constant effort.

VP
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 1231
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V48
GRE 1: 1540 Q800 V740
Followers: 133

Kudos [?]: 587 [3] , given: 19

Re: CR , but except [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 May 2012, 00:30
3
KUDOS
uledssul,

The equipment from option (B) is relevant - it is important for the firm to determine if the equipment that they have been using with common salt will also work with potassium chloride. If it does not, then the company will have to spend more in fixing/upgrading/replacing the equipment.

On the other hand, for option (E), the similarity of the chemical properties that make potassium chloride effective with those that make common salt effective are irrelevant - what matters is whether those properties do the job, i.e. preserve animal hides. As long as this is being done, that is all that the manufacturer will care about.

_________________

GyanOne | Top MBA Rankings and MBA Admissions Blog

Premium MBA Essay Review|Best MBA Interview Preparation|Exclusive GMAT coaching

Get a FREE Detailed MBA Profile Evaluation | Call us now +91 98998 31738

Intern
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2013, 12:54
when i went through this question none of the answers seemed correct.

for the OA correct answer E i would contest that it "WOULD" be important to look into the chemical properties because if KCl somewhere down the line caused corrosion or ruined the leather product the companies will end up having to refund the customers money which will end up costing them money had they not looked into this issue to begin with.

xsports wrote:
E.
Easy pesy

Last edited by Narenn on 06 Oct 2013, 10:49, edited 1 time in total.
All similar threads have been merged.
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Posts: 400
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 212 [0], given: 82

Re: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2014, 01:32
freetheking wrote:
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 54
Page: 138
Difficulty:

Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?

I think E is not correct..becase question stem is asking that..what wud "impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt"

so company shd luk chemical properties because if there wud be any difference in properties to preserve animal hides b/w potasium chloride and salt it may effect the qulity of leather?

anyone will clear my doubt?
_________________

Bole So Nehal.. Sat Siri Akal.. Waheguru ji help me to get 700+ score !

Intern
Joined: 30 Nov 2013
Posts: 33
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 6

Re: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2014, 12:16
sanjoo wrote:
freetheking wrote:
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 54
Page: 138
Difficulty:

Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?

I think E is not correct..becase question stem is asking that..what wud "impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt"

so company shd luk chemical properties because if there wud be any difference in properties to preserve animal hides b/w potasium chloride and salt it may effect the qulity of leather?

anyone will clear my doubt?

You are thinking too much !!! Chemical properties and quality have no connection !! It is possible to create a good quality product using different material. so E is quite broad and irrelevant. Just a tip in CR just answer from what is given !! NEVER make additional assumptions and connections Hope i was able to make it clear .
Manager
Joined: 23 May 2014
Posts: 105
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 32 [4] , given: 6

Re: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jun 2014, 20:32
4
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

Need to evaluate answer choices keeping cost in mind.
All the answer choices that directly affect cost are valid choices.

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides? - Incorrect. Talks about cost.
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride? - Incorrect. If equipment is not reusable then it will increase cost.
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride? - Incorrect. This will again affect the cost.
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used? - Incorrect. if quality is not the same then this can hamper sale and profits
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so? - Correct. Chemical properties are not relevant here. The answer choice already says that potassium chloride is an effective means of preserving animal hides. So we are not concerned with what is the chemical composition as long as it does the job.
Current Student
Joined: 28 Aug 2014
Posts: 8
Schools: Queens'17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 17

Re: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2014, 19:19
It came down to C and E for me andI chose C.

C- If environmental regulation takes precedence then profits will have to take a backseat.
E- Chemical properties of both common salt and KCl2 does matter because it could affect the quality of leather produced, hence affecting the profits.
Intern
Joined: 22 Apr 2013
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 7

Re: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2014, 07:34
I closed down to c and e.

I think option d and e are almost similar, i.e if option d is considered then there is no need of considering option e.
Option c - though there is less water for disposal, he has to consider the regulations for this.

Re: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of   [#permalink] 22 Nov 2014, 07:34

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 38 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 At a large manufacturing corporation, the ratio of the annual job-rela 2 30 Dec 2016, 08:52
6 Manager: the new manufacturing process should save us time.. 2 05 Feb 2016, 07:27
1 The conventional process for tanning leather uses large 2 23 Nov 2013, 00:35
18 Large corporations use several strategies to minimize their 23 26 Mar 2016, 19:37
Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of 0 01 May 2012, 00:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.