It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 22:45

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Tax evasion

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Status: It's "Go" Time.......
Affiliations: N.C.C.
Joined: 22 Feb 2011
Posts: 180

Kudos [?]: 89 [2], given: 2

Location: India

### Show Tags

28 Apr 2011, 08:10
2
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (01:25) correct 35% (02:21) wrong based on 243 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

We are twice armed if we fight with faith.

He who knows when he can fight & when He can't will be victorious.

Kudos [?]: 89 [2], given: 2

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1283

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

28 Apr 2011, 10:05
I must say this was a close call between C and D.
Both these options introduce a new reason as an assumption. Options A,B and E can be POE'd.
However, option D if you negate the statement then it actually supports the argument.As, lowering tax rates and putting fine won't deter the evaders.Thus the increase in tax rates by the law maker. Hence POE.

In option C, using negation there won't be a necessity for the lawmakers to increase the tax rates,if they had planned for the revenue lost.Hence, the argument falls apart. Thus it is the OA.

Good question indeed.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 10

Manager
Status: Never give up!
Affiliations: Beta Gamma Sigma, Omicron Delta Epsilon, Toastmasters Intl, HHonors
Joined: 04 Nov 2009
Posts: 223

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 27

Location: Raleigh-Durham NC

### Show Tags

28 Apr 2011, 10:22
I thought C made more sense to set things up, but D was really really close on its heels as a corollary. The assumption to C makes the situation inevitable, but there must be a core of evaders who will never comply unless otherwise forced / induced.

Great question.
_________________

= = = = = = = = = =

If you liked my post, please consider a Kudos for me. Thanks!

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 27

Manager
Status: It's "Go" Time.......
Affiliations: N.C.C.
Joined: 22 Feb 2011
Posts: 180

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 2

Location: India

### Show Tags

28 Apr 2011, 10:48
I agree with you on your reasoning behind choice "C"..but I do not concur with the explanation for elimination of choice "D"..

Question stem is like this if not A(the answer choice) then not B(the vicious cycle).

Choice "D" states that unless the low tax rates are reinforced with the hefty fines for the evasion, the tax evasion is bound to occur.This choice is vague.Now if this statement were true then the so called vicious cycle will not occur.
If A(the answer choice) then not B(The vicious cycle) Thus choice "D" is out!

Choice "C" states that Lawmakers do not account for the lost revenue through evasion.This statement must be true because if lawmakers would have accounted for the lost revenue then they won't have increased the interest rates.
If not A(the answer choice) then not B(the vicious cycle)

Which makes "C" the best among all choices.

amit2k9 wrote:
I must say this was a close call between C and D.
Both these options introduce a new reason as an assumption. Options A,B and E can be POE'd.
However, option D if you negate the statement then it actually supports the argument.As, lowering tax rates and putting fine won't deter the evaders.Thus the increase in tax rates by the law maker. Hence POE.

In option C, using negation there won't be a necessity for the lawmakers to increase the tax rates,if they had planned for the revenue lost.Hence, the argument falls apart. Thus it is the OA.

Good question indeed.

_________________

We are twice armed if we fight with faith.

He who knows when he can fight & when He can't will be victorious.

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 2

TOEFL Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1603

Kudos [?]: 601 [0], given: 40

Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2011, 01:19
The answer is C, by negation technique.
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 601 [0], given: 40

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 621

Kudos [?]: 284 [0], given: 51

### Show Tags

30 Apr 2011, 01:03
'Choice "D" states that unless the low tax rates are reinforced with the hefty fines for the evasion, the tax evasion is bound to occur.This choice is vague.Now if this statement were true then the so called vicious cycle will not occur.
If A(the answer choice) then not B(The vicious cycle) Thus choice "D" is out!'

agreed on the reason you eliminated D , the purpose is to kill the vicious cycle , and the passage is not about lowering of taxes as a method , it is out of context.the shell game this one.
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Kudos [?]: 284 [0], given: 51

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10130

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2015, 23:15
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 10169

Kudos [?]: 3531 [0], given: 173

Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2015, 00:26
Hi All,

This CR prompt describes a circular/repeating cycle that occurs when people evade paying taxes…

1) People avoid paying income taxes
2) Lawmakers are FORCED to raise income taxes
3) The tax burden becomes worse for people who actually pay tax, so….we end up back at Step 1….

1) More people avoid paying income taxes
Etc.

We're essentially asked to define WHY this cycle happens. When reading the prompt, I focused on the word "forced" - why EXACTLY would lawmakers be FORCED to raise taxes if some people didn't pay??? There must be some "need" for that money; when the lawmakers don't get what they need, then they have to raise taxes to try to get what they need. We're looking for an answer that addresses this issue (and likely points out something faulty in the lawmakers plan that causes the problem to occur).

[Reveal] Spoiler:
C
gives us exactly what we're looking for. The root "cause" of the cycle and the reason why it occurs.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
_________________

760+: Learn What GMAT Assassins Do to Score at the Highest Levels
Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com

# Rich Cohen

Co-Founder & GMAT Assassin

Special Offer: Save \$75 + GMAT Club Tests Free
Official GMAT Exam Packs + 70 Pt. Improvement Guarantee
www.empowergmat.com/

***********************Select EMPOWERgmat Courses now include ALL 6 Official GMAC CATs!***********************

Kudos [?]: 3531 [0], given: 173

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10130

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Mar 2017, 02:07
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: Tax evasion   [#permalink] 13 Mar 2017, 02:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by