Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 27 May 2017, 06:31

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Technically a given category of insurance policy is

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Manager
Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 94
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Technically a given category of insurance policy is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2006, 12:52
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Technically a given category of insurance policy is underpriced if, over time, claims against it plus expenses associated with it exceed total income from premiums. But premium income can be invested and will then yield returns of its own. Therefore, an underpriced policy does not represent a net loss in every case.
The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?
(A) No insurance policies are deliberately underpriced in order to attract customers to the insurance company offering such policies.
(B) A policy that represents a net loss to the insurance company is not an underpriced policy in every case.
(C) There are policies for which the level of claims per year can be predicted with great accuracy before premiums are set.
(D) The income earned by investing premium income is the most important determinant of an insurance companyâ€™s profits.
(E) The claims against at least some underpriced policies do not require paying out all of the premium income from those policies as soon as it is earned.
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 434
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2006, 13:13
My Choice is B

Here is my explaination:

Technically a given category of insurance policy is underpriced if, over time, claims against it plus expenses associated with it exceed total income from premiums. But premium income can be invested and will then yield returns of its own. Therefore, an underpriced policy does not represent a net loss in every case.
The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?
(A) No insurance policies are deliberately underpriced in order to attract customers to the insurance company offering such policies.
Too strong word
(B) A policy that represents a net loss to the insurance company is not an underpriced policy in every case.
(C) There are policies for which the level of claims per year can be predicted with great accuracy before premiums are set.
Out of Scope
(D) The income earned by investing premium income is the most important determinant of an insurance companyâ€™s profits.
Too Strong word
(E) The claims against at least some underpriced policies do not require paying out all of the premium income from those policies as soon as it is earned.

I picked up B between B and E.

What is OA??
Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 526
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2006, 17:27
Should be E.
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 381
Location: TX
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2006, 18:40
I think its C

The premium money can be invested only if the insurance company is able to invest rather than pay out the premium as claims. So , the insurance companies can only have a stable revenue if it can accurately predict the actual money it has to pay out as claims. If it can't guarantee a stable revenue it will have to increase the premium to cover the associated risk of increasing claims.

C clearly states that assumption , negate it the argument falls apart.
VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1019
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2006, 19:49
one more C.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 707
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2006, 19:50
I'm for E.
Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 124
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2006, 20:34
I am in for E too.

(A) Motive for under pricing does not figure in to the statement
(B) This talks about an overpriced policy that still has a loss associated - Not in scope
(C) If level of claims can be predicted before premiums are set, then no premium need to be underpriced. The argument however states that a policy is underpriced IF, OVER TIME...Therefore, this cannot be an assumption
(D) Not necessarily true
(E) The fact that an underpriced policy does not represent a net loss in every case means that there are atleast some cases of underpriced policies for which premium income is invested to earn additional income as oppossed to paying out as soon as it is earned. So E is the right choice
Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 747
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2006, 21:12
Say a policy received a preminum of $1 million and at the sametime had to settle claims of$1 million. Where is the money to invest ?

Answer is without doubt (E)
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5221
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 404 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2006, 08:58
I'll go out on a limb here and choose (A).

What if the insurance company purposely took a loss on some not so lucrative policies so as to snag larger ones? This seems like the only logical gap between the evidence and conclusion.
Manager
Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 94
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2006, 14:00
OA is E
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 381
Location: TX
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2006, 18:23
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
Say a policy received a preminum of $1 million and at the sametime had to settle claims of$1 million. Where is the money to invest ?

Answer is without doubt (E)

Yes you are right this should be E . I went overboard with my reasoning.
Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 90
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2006, 12:24
E sounds right
29 Oct 2006, 12:24
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Technically a given category of insurance policy is 3 29 Apr 2010, 06:57
Technically a given category of insurance policy is under 3 04 May 2009, 11:08
CR - Health insurance 5 01 May 2009, 22:59
Technically a given category of insurance policy is 7 10 Jun 2009, 07:01
Insurance Company X is considering issuing a new policy to 5 17 May 2010, 04:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Technically a given category of insurance policy is

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.