It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 11:14

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 162

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2006, 01:59
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:47) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade. However, the threshold of economic viability for solar power (that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is unchanged at thirty-five dollars.
Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?
(A) The cost of oil has fallen dramatically.
(B) The reduction in the cost of solar-power equipment has occurred despite increased raw material costs for that equipment.
(C) Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants.
(D) Most electricity is generated by coal-fired or nuclear, rather than oil-fired, power plants.
(E) When the price of oil increases, reserves of oil not previously worth exploiting become economically viable.

Canadians now increasingly engage in â€œout-shopping,â€

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2006, 10:05
1. C
2. A
3. C

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 109

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Louvain, Belgium

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2006, 10:53
C , A ,C for me

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 162

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2006, 23:39
Can you please post the OE?

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 May 2006
Posts: 109

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Louvain, Belgium

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2006, 00:34
1) The solar process is becoming more efficinet but the threshold does not change. This implies the oil-furnaces are also getting efficient. Option A also looks good but now way to know the reduction in the cost of oil actually improves the efficiency too.

2) Social service costs not included outside. If outside sales increase, then the amount of taxes collected by Canadian govn will increase and it will be forced to levy higher taxes.

3) option B is a very special case which cannot be concluded
option C clearly mentions that there are greater proportions of LH people in the intelligent group as compared to the group with lower intelligence. Based on the stem, this is correct

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

26 Jun 2006, 00:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.