It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 19:34

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 368

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Location: Phoenix AZ
Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2006, 12:59
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade. However, the threshold of economic viability for solar power (that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is unchanged at thirty-five dollars.

Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?

(A) The cost of oil has fallen dramatically.
(B) The reduction in the cost of solar-power equipment has occurred despite increased raw material costs for that equipment.
(C) Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants.
(D) Most electricity is generated by coal-fired or nuclear, rather than oil-fired, power plants.
(E) When the price of oil increases, reserves of oil not previously worth exploiting become economically viable.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2892

Kudos [?]: 324 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2006, 13:03
Looks like a straight C.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 324 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 162

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2006, 13:09
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
E 85 % C sounds compelling also but there is no mention
of tech change in oil-fired power plants. so it is out.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 162

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2006, 16:37
waiting for OA

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 368

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Location: Phoenix AZ

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2006, 21:11
The OA is C. However, I would appreciate if someone could explain why it is not A.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1728

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2006, 21:15
Clear winner C.

If the price of Oil fell dramatically, it would have an effect on the threshold. But the threshold has remained unchanged.

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 162

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2006, 21:18

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 2302

Kudos [?]: 481 [0], given: 0

Schools: Darden
Re: CR --- Solar and Oil [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2006, 15:02
C is the clear choice.

Kudos [?]: 481 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5204

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2006, 00:08
mailtheguru wrote:
The OA is C. However, I would appreciate if someone could explain why it is not A.

1. We don`t know the current price per barrel of oil (in the context of this passage). Could be \$10 or \$100 p/barrel??

2. Even if we did know the ppb, who's to say that the sudden drop wasn't a market anomaly and prices wouldn`t return to their original level after a few days, weeks, years of trading...???

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 56

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Moscow, Russia
Re: CR --- Solar and Oil [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2006, 06:25
it's C. Fr A, even if the cost of oil has fallen dramatically, taty's beside the point: the question deals with the cost efficiency of solar power. Also, we know nothing about the cost of oil since the stimulus talks only about the price.
_________________

________________________________
"Amicus Plato, sed magic amica veritas"

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 233

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2006, 16:10

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 0

24 Aug 2006, 16:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by