It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 20:01

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 258

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2006, 12:07
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the government-mandated minimum-wage level because employers cannot afford to pay that much for extra help. Therefore, if Congress institutes a subminimum wage, a new lower legal wage for teenagers, the teenage unemployment rate, which has been rising since 1960, will no longer increase.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

(A) Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen when the minimum wage has risen.

(B) Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen even when the minimum wage remained constant.

(C) Employers often hire extra help during holiday and warm weather seasons.

(D) The teenage unemployment rate rose more quickly in the 1970â€™s than it did in the 1960â€™s.

(E) The teenage unemployment rate has occasionally declined in the years since 1960.

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 18 Sep 2006
Posts: 43

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2006, 12:16
B
It suggests that there could be some other factors for rising teenage unemployment rate and not minimum wage..so this would weaken the argument.
What's the OA?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 210

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2006, 14:56
I have to go with E on this one...

It says that the unemployent rate has declined a few times since 1960.. which means it declined without the new wage law in effect..

Thus, the relationship is broken. Unemployment rate is not tied to the wage law.

One second thought...B looks good to.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1011

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2006, 20:03
lanuk wrote:
B
It suggests that there could be some other factors for rising teenage unemployment rate and not minimum wage..so this would weaken the argument.
What's the OA?

B for the same reason.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 377

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Location: TX

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2006, 20:24
another B.

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 524

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

Location: US

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2006, 20:32
would like to go with E here.

I dont think rate remaining same can weaken the argument. If we can find or state another reason (other that having subminimum wage) then we can weaken the argument. B certainly doesn't do that ----

Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen even when the minimum wage remained constant. It says minimum wage has remained same. So we don't know what is the effect of decrease in minimum wage.
But E
(E) The teenage unemployment rate has occasionally declined in the years since 1960.

So there is some other reason for unemployment rate to go down.

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1161

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2006, 00:03
B is definite.

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

Schools: Olin Business School - Washington University

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2006, 10:29
Going w E

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 700

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2006, 11:04
B for me

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 258

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2006, 11:05
OA is B
no OE.

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2006
Posts: 95

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2006, 12:09
Going with B.

Argument says the teenage unemployment rate is increasing because of higher minimum wage and employers don't want to pay that.

Choice B says even when min wage remained constant, rate of unemployment rate has increased, which essentially weakens argument.
_________________

http://gmatstuff.blogspot.com

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 26 Dec 2005
Posts: 42

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2006, 12:21
B/w B and E, E looks like the answer.
My reasoning

(B) Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen even when the minimum wage remained constant. - That could be because as suggested in para earlier, the industries could not afford them hence did not hire them even if the wages were steady.It could mean that if the wages were lowered, they could be hired hence decreasing the emplyment rate. hence does not neccesarily weaken the argument

(E) The teenage unemployment rate has occasionally declined in the years since 1960.
Weakens the arg by stating that wages may not be the only reason for the unemployment rate

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

26 Sep 2006, 12:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.