Bunuel wrote:
The following letter was sent to a candidate applying for entrance to Nathford University.
Thank you for your interest in Nathford University. We regret to say that your application for entrance has been rejected. Unfortunately, because of the unusually high number of candidates this year, we were not even able to accept all those with SAT scores of 1000 or above, as has been our practice in the past. We have only a limited number of openings and must accept entering students accordingly.
Which of the following can be validly concluded from the letter?
A. The student receiving the letter had SAT scores of 1000 or above.
B. The student receiving the letter did not have SAT scores of 1000 or above.
C. Nathford University accepted only those students with SAT scores of 1000 or above.
D. Nathford University rejected many students with SAT scores of 1000 or above.
E. Nathford University had constraints other than SAT scores that affected selection of candidates.
What the letter implies:
This year, it saw an unusually high number of applications.
In past years, they used to accept all who had SAT score of 1000 or above. And they used to admit some even with score less than 1000 (implied by the use of "even").
This year, they couldn't even admit all who had SAT score of 1000 or above. So at least one person with score 1000 or above was rejected.
Note that it is possible that some people with less than 1000 score were accepted this year too. We don't know what the other constraints are.
What can we conclude?
A. The student receiving the letter had SAT scores of 1000 or above.
The letter doesn't mention anything about the student's score.
B. The student receiving the letter did not have SAT scores of 1000 or above.
The letter doesn't mention anything about the student's score. The use of "even" only goes to show that in the past, they used to accept people with SAT scores of 1000 or more and perhaps some with lower scores too (based on other criteria). But this year, even the score criterion led to too many applicants and hence they couldn't admit all those people.
Also, most likely it is a generic letter sent to all rejected applicants. It needed to mention something specific about the student receiving it to imply anything about her score.
nikitamaheshwariC. Nathford University accepted only those students with SAT scores of 1000 or above.
Not true as discussed above. The use of "even" goes to show that in the past, they used to accept people with SAT scores of 1000 or more and perhaps some with lower scores too (based on other criteria).
D. Nathford University rejected many students with SAT scores of 1000 or above.
We don't how many students with 1000 or more scores were rejected. Perhaps just 1 or 2. Were many rejected? We cannot say.
E. Nathford University had constraints other than SAT scores that affected selection of candidates.
Yes. In previous years, they used to accept candidates under some other constraints too. This year too, they would have shortlisted candidates based on some other constraints too since too many had a SAT score of 1000 or more.
Correct.
Answer (E)