Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 01:27 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 01:27

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92893
Own Kudos [?]: 618671 [17]
Given Kudos: 81586
Send PM
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11161
Own Kudos [?]: 31876 [1]
Given Kudos: 290
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2013
Posts: 120
Own Kudos [?]: 315 [0]
Given Kudos: 124
Location: India
Schools: ISB '20 GMBA '20
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V36
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2017
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 88 [0]
Given Kudos: 42
Send PM
Re: The 2-digit positive integer x has the property that it is divisible [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
The 2-digit positive integer x has the property that it is divisible by its units digit. What is x?


(1) x^3 has a units digit of 7

(2) x + 1 is also divisible by its units digit.


From 1: Since X^3 has a unit digit 7, therefore, unit digit of x must be 3.
Now two digit numbers, which are divisible to its own unit digit are 33,63 & 93 - Since Multiple answer, therefore not sufficient

From 2: if x=11 then x+1=12, all of these are divisible by it's unit digit. Similarly, (21,22), (31,32)......- Multiple answer- Not Sufficient

Combining 1 & 2, we have only 63, which satisfy both.

Hence, C is the answer.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Jun 2018
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 20
GMAT 1: 600 Q36 V37
Send PM
Re: The 2-digit positive integer x has the property that it is divisible [#permalink]
anuj04 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
The 2-digit positive integer x has the property that it is divisible by its units digit. What is x?


(1) x^3 has a units digit of 7

(2) x + 1 is also divisible by its units digit.


From 1: Since X^3 has a unit digit 7, therefore, unit digit of x must be 3.
Now two digit numbers, which are divisible to its own unit digit are 33,63 & 93 - Since Multiple answer, therefore not sufficient

From 2: if x=11 then x+1=12, all of these are divisible by it's unit digit. Similarly, (21,22), (31,32)......- Multiple answer- Not Sufficient

Combining 1 & 2, we have only 63, which satisfy both.

Hence, C is the answer.


Hi,

I have understand why and how a & b independently are not sufficient but can't seem to understand how both of them together are sufficient. i.e. how does 63 satisfy both the equations.
63+1=64 which is not divisible by 3 the units digit of 63.
Please let me know.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2016
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 21 [0]
Given Kudos: 56
Send PM
Re: The 2-digit positive integer x has the property that it is divisible [#permalink]
mrinalsharma1990 wrote:
anuj04 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
The 2-digit positive integer x has the property that it is divisible by its units digit. What is x?


(1) x^3 has a units digit of 7

(2) x + 1 is also divisible by its units digit.


From 1: Since X^3 has a unit digit 7, therefore, unit digit of x must be 3.
Now two digit numbers, which are divisible to its own unit digit are 33,63 & 93 - Since Multiple answer, therefore not sufficient

From 2: if x=11 then x+1=12, all of these are divisible by it's unit digit. Similarly, (21,22), (31,32)......- Multiple answer- Not Sufficient

Combining 1 & 2, we have only 63, which satisfy both.

Hence, C is the answer.



Hi,

I have understand why and how a & b independently are not sufficient but can't seem to understand how both of them together are sufficient. i.e. how does 63 satisfy both the equations.
63+1=64 which is not divisible by 3 the units digit of 63.
Please let me know.


it is not about 64/3, instead it is 64/4 [ unit digit of the number]
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2017
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 88 [0]
Given Kudos: 42
Send PM
Re: The 2-digit positive integer x has the property that it is divisible [#permalink]
mrinalsharma1990 wrote:
anuj04 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
The 2-digit positive integer x has the property that it is divisible by its units digit. What is x?


(1) x^3 has a units digit of 7

(2) x + 1 is also divisible by its units digit.


From 1: Since X^3 has a unit digit 7, therefore, unit digit of x must be 3.
Now two digit numbers, which are divisible to its own unit digit are 33,63 & 93 - Since Multiple answer, therefore not sufficient

From 2: if x=11 then x+1=12, all of these are divisible by it's unit digit. Similarly, (21,22), (31,32)......- Multiple answer- Not Sufficient

Combining 1 & 2, we have only 63, which satisfy both.

Hence, C is the answer.


Hi,

I have understand why and how a & b independently are not sufficient but can't seem to understand how both of them together are sufficient. i.e. how does 63 satisfy both the equations.
63+1=64 which is not divisible by 3 the units digit of 63.
Please let me know.

mrinalsharma1990
It's not 63 rather 63+1=64 is divisible by 4.

Hope it helps!
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 May 2018
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The 2-digit positive integer x has the property that it is divisible [#permalink]
How we got number 33, 63, 93 and 77?

Sent from my RNE-L21 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Posts: 99
Own Kudos [?]: 183 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.99
WE:Engineering (Computer Hardware)
Send PM
The 2-digit positive integer x has the property that it is divisible. [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
The 2-digit positive integer x has the property that it is divisible by its units digit. What is x?

(1) x^3 has a units digit of 5

(2) x+1 is also divisible by its units digit.

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked
Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked
Both statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question asked; but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient
EACH statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question asked
Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question asked, and additional data specific to the problem are needed

Originally posted by ruchik on 03 Jan 2019, 21:29.
Last edited by ruchik on 03 Jan 2019, 21:46, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Posts: 99
Own Kudos [?]: 183 [0]
Given Kudos: 57
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.99
WE:Engineering (Computer Hardware)
Send PM
Re: The 2-digit positive integer x has the property that it is divisible. [#permalink]
Statement 1 suggests that X^3 has unit digit of 5. Hence we know the unit digit of number is 5. as only 5^3 will have the number 5 as unit digit.
So the possible two digit number can be 15,25,35,45,55,65,75,85,95.
statement 1 is not sufficient.

Statement 2 says x+1 is divisible by its own unit digit.
We can have number pairs of X and X+1 as 11 and 12, 21 and 22, 31 and 32.
So clearly not sufficient.

Statement 1 and statement 2 combined will leave us with two numbers 35,65 both have x+1 divisible by it unit digit.
Hence not sufficient.

So answer is E.

Please give kudos if you like the explanation.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92893
Own Kudos [?]: 618671 [0]
Given Kudos: 81586
Send PM
Re: The 2-digit positive integer x has the property that it is divisible [#permalink]
Expert Reply
ruchik wrote:
The 2-digit positive integer x has the property that it is divisible by its units digit. What is x?

(1) x^3 has a units digit of 5

(2) x+1 is also divisible by its units digit.

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked
Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked
Both statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question asked; but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient
EACH statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question asked
Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question asked, and additional data specific to the problem are needed

_______________
Merging topics.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32639
Own Kudos [?]: 821 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The 2-digit positive integer x has the property that it is divisible [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The 2-digit positive integer x has the property that it is divisible [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92888 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne