It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 13:56

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The advanced technology of ski boots and bindings has

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Affiliations: PMI, ASQ
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 119

Kudos [?]: 1287 [1], given: 21

GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2012, 07:55
1
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

66% (01:52) correct 34% (02:02) wrong based on 282 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The advanced technology of ski boots and bindings has brought a dramatic drop in the incidence of injuries that occur on the slopes of ski resorts: from 9 injuries per 1,000 skiers in 1950 to 3 in 1980. As a result, the remainder of ski-related injuries, which includes all injuries occurring on the premises of a ski resort but not on the slopes, rose from 10 percent of all ski-related injuries in 1950 to 25 percent in 1980. The incidence of these injuries, including accidents such as falling down steps, increases with the amount of alcohol consumed per skier.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage?

(A) As the number of ski injuries that occur on the slopes decreases, the number of injuries that occur on the premises of ski resorts increases.
(B) The amount of alcohol consumed per skier increased between 1950 and 1980.
(C) The technology of ski boots and bindings affects the incidence of each type of ski-related injury.
(D) If the technology of ski boots and bindings continues to advance, the incidence of ski-related injuries will continue to decline.
(E) Injuries that occurred on the slopes of ski resorts made up a smaller percentage of ski-related injuries in 1980 than in 1950.

Source: LSAT
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by broall on 23 Sep 2017, 02:47, edited 1 time in total.
Reformatted question

Kudos [?]: 1287 [1], given: 21

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 274

Kudos [?]: 376 [0], given: 51

Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2012, 08:20
The number of injuries on the slopes has decreased in 1980 compared to 1950.But the total number of injuries has increased .Hence the percentage of injuries on the slope has decreased in 1980 compared to 1950.Hence answer is E.
_________________

+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks

Kudos [?]: 376 [0], given: 51

Retired Moderator
Affiliations: PMI, ASQ
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 119

Kudos [?]: 1287 [1], given: 21

GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2012, 08:49
1
KUDOS
We’re told that, from 1950 to 1980, the percentage of all ski-related injuries at ski resorts that did not occur on the slopes increased from 10% to 25%. That must mean that the percentage of ski-related injuries at ski resorts that did occur on the slopes must have decreased over that same period. Think about it this way: there are only two possible alternatives for a ski related injury: either it occurs on the slopes or it does not occur on the slopes. So if the share of ski-related injuries represented by one type of injury goes up, the share represented by the other type MUST go down. That’s choice (E).

(A) We have no information about the number of the different types of ski-related injuries occurring, only about the percentage of total injuries represented by the two different types of injuries. Since we don’t know how or whether the total number of injuries changed, we can’t infer (A).

(B) We can infer nothing about the amount of alcohol consumed. It’s true that increased alcohol consumption causes an increase in injuries off the slopes, but we don’t know that those injuries have increased numerically, nor do we know that alcohol consumption is the only thing that could bring about an increase.

(C) Although the stimulus says improved ski boots and bindings have decreased the incidence of injuries on the slopes, it never implies that they have any effect on off-slope
injuries.

(D) is unwarranted for two reasons: first, the fact that better boots and bindings have reduced the incidence of on-slope injuries in the past is no guarantee that they will do so in the future and, second, (D) speaks of “ski-related injuries” in general, and we have no reason to believe that boots and bindings have any effect on the incidence of off-slope injuries.
_________________

Legendary Collections
1. 700 Level Quant 2. IIM Quant 3. 100 CR from LSAT 4. 100 Legendary SC 5. 5000 Practice problems 6.125 Quant 7. 38 SC 8. 10 Full Length GMAT Pen&Paper Tests
9. 1500+ RC 10. 100 Legendary CR 11. Additional Verbal Qs 12. Additional Quant Qs

My debrief |Free essay review initiative
PM me for One-on-One Webex Tutoring

Kudos [?]: 1287 [1], given: 21

Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 192

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 22

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2012, 00:44
(A) As the number of ski injuries that occur on the slopes decreases, the number of injuries that occur on the premises of ski resorts increases. - Relation between ski injuries on slopes and premises of ski resorts is not mentioned in the argument - Incorrect
(B) The amount of alcohol consumed per skier increased between 1950 and 1980. - Cannot be inferred from the passage - Incorrect
(C) The technology of ski boots and bindings affects the incidence of each type of ski-related injury. - Out of scope - Incorrect
(D) If the technology of ski boots and bindings continues to advance, the incidence of ski-related injuries will continue to decline. - Cannot be inferred with the information given in the passage - Incorrect
(E) Injuries that occurred on the slopes of ski resorts made up a smaller percentage of ski-related injuries in 1980 than in 1950. - The injuries on the slopes has decreased from the year 1950 to 1980. That would automatically decrease the percentage share of injuries on slopes over the total number of injuries - Correct

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 22

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10107

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2013, 18:59
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2013
Posts: 95

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 32

Location: India
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2013, 05:31
I used some Mathematics to tackle this question...

1.) 9 Injuries on the slopes in 1950, 10% of all injuries were not on the slopes. So we can say that 1 injury occurred in the premises of the ski resort.

1/10- 10% of all Injuries are on the premises.

2.) 3 Injuries on the slopes in 1980, 25% of all injuries were not on the slopes. So we can say that 1 injury occurred in the premises of the ski resort.

1/4- 25% of all Injuries are on the premises.

(A) As the number of ski injuries that occur on the slopes decreases, the number of injuries that occur on the premises of ski resorts increases.---- Incorrect, as you can see above that number of ski injuries decreases from 9 to 3 but then number of injuries that occur on the premises stay the same.
(B) The amount of alcohol consumed per skier increased between 1950 and 1980.--- Out of scope. No information regarding alcohol consumption
(C) The technology of ski boots and bindings affects the incidence of each type of ski-related injury.---- Each type is taking it too far isn't it??? The technology must have affected some of the injuries but definitely not all...
(D) If the technology of ski boots and bindings continues to advance, the incidence of ski-related injuries will continue to decline.---- This is a future event. What if there cannot be any more decline in the injuries no matter what you do with ski boots and bindings...
(E) Injuries that occurred on the slopes of ski resorts made up a smaller percentage of ski-related injuries in 1980 than in 1950.--- CORRECT, as you can see in the analysis above, Injuries that occurred on the slopes in 1980-3/4=75% whereas in 1950- 9/10-90%. Absolutely TRUE.

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 32

Intern
Joined: 29 Dec 2016
Posts: 26

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 66

Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 550 Q47 V20
GPA: 3.2

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2017, 09:56
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The advanced technology of ski boots and bindings
has brought a dramatic drop in the incidence of injuries
that occur on the slopes of ski resorts: from 9 injuries per
1,000 skiers in 1950 to 3 in 1980. As a result, the remainder
of ski-related injuries, which includes all injuries occurring
on the premises of a ski resort but not on the slopes, rose
from 10 percent of all ski-related injuries in 1950 to 25
percent in 1980. The incidence of these injuries, including
accidents such as falling down steps, increases with the
amount of alcohol consumed per skier.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred
from the passage?

(A) As the number of ski injuries that occur on the
slopes decreases, the number of injuries that
occur on the premises of ski resorts increases.
(B) The amount of alcohol consumed per skier
increased between 1950 and 1980.
(C) The technology of ski boots and bindings
affects the incidence of each type of
ski-related injury.
(D) If the technology of ski boots and bindings
continues to advance, the incidence of
ski-related injuries will continue to decline.
(E) Injuries that occurred on the slopes of ski
resorts made up a smaller percentage of
ski-related injuries in 1980 than in 1950.

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 66

Manager
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Posts: 173

Kudos [?]: 221 [1], given: 19

GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51

### Show Tags

24 Feb 2017, 14:58
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Takdir wrote:

You can look at the argument in math terms.

1950: 9 injuries on the slopes per 1000 skiers --> Off slopes injuries are 10% of injuries. So, 9 on slopes injuries per 1000 must be 90% of injuries.

Total injuries per 1000 1950: 9 on slopes + 1 off slopes = 10 total

1980: 3 injuries on the slopes per 1000 skiers --> Off slopes injuries are 25% of injuries. So, 3 on slopes injuries per 1000 must be 75% of injuries.

Total injures per 1000 1980: 3 on slopes + 1 off slopes = 4 total

Now let's look at the answer choices.

(A) As the number of ski injuries that occur on the
slopes decreases, the number of injuries that
occur on the premises of ski resorts increases.

No. The off slope number per 1000 did not change.

(B) The amount of alcohol consumed per skier
increased between 1950 and 1980.

There is no reason to believe this, especially as off slope injuries did not increase.

(C) The technology of ski boots and bindings
affects the incidence of each type of
ski-related injury.

Actually, off slope injuries did not change even after the introduction of the ski boots and bindings.

(D) If the technology of ski boots and bindings
continues to advance, the incidence of
ski-related injuries will continue to decline.

This seems likely, but the prompt does not actually indicate that this is the case. The prompt discusses what happened in the past without saying much that indicates what would happen in the future should the technology continue to advance.

(E) Injuries that occurred on the slopes of ski
resorts made up a smaller percentage of
ski-related injuries in 1980 than in 1950.

This is true. In 1950, on slopes injuries constituted 90% of injuries. In 1980, on slopes injuries constituted 75% of injuries.

_________________

Marty Murray
GMAT Coach
m.w.murray@hotmail.com
http://infinitemindprep.com

Kudos [?]: 221 [1], given: 19

Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2016
Posts: 172

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 46

Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V29

### Show Tags

14 Mar 2017, 03:41
B. We're not told that the amount of alco comsumed per skier has been increased. So it could have been remained the same.
C. Tricky one, however it covers all types of ski-related injuries and since we are told that off-slope injuries are classified as ski-related injuries as well that statement cannot be inferred from the argument as long as despite the fact the ski&bindings technology advances we see that it doesn't affect positively off-slope injuries.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 46

Retired Moderator
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 816

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 32

### Show Tags

09 Jul 2017, 00:48
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 32

Re: The advanced technology of ski boots and bindings has   [#permalink] 09 Jul 2017, 00:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The advanced technology of ski boots and bindings has

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.