GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Sep 2018, 20:24

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 756
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2014, 01:24
the conclusion is : To achieve this result, the city government should convene employers and educators to determine how best to create paths of upward mobility in these fields

that means that the argument is contending that govt intervention could help to achieve this goal .now what does the question ask?

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?

that means we do not have to kill the argument but we have to present a statement that can most help us to weaken the conclusion
B says: Government efforts have been shown to affect employment trends only rarely---->thereby creating that element of doubt in the validity of the conclusion

does that help?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2012
Posts: 297
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 2: 770 Q50 V47
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2014, 09:24
aditya8062 wrote:
the conclusion is : To achieve this result, the city government should convene employers and educators to determine how best to create paths of upward mobility in these fields

that means that the argument is contending that govt intervention could help to achieve this goal .now what does the question ask?

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?

that means we do not have to kill the argument but we have to present a statement that can most help us to weaken the conclusion
B says: Government efforts have been shown to affect employment trends only rarely---->thereby creating that element of doubt in the validity of the conclusion

does that help?


As per argument, the government's intervention is supposed to affect the youth after they are employed. How does it weaken the argument if government's efforts doesn't affect much before employment ?
_________________

"Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well."
― Voltaire


Press Kudos, if I have helped.
Thanks!

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 756
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2014, 10:28
Quote:
As per argument, the government's intervention is supposed to affect the youth after they are employed


this interpretation is not correct !!

the govt is trying to update people so that they have required skills to fill in those jobs .for instance if there is a job for typist then all govt needs to do is to get him learn a "typing" .now whether he outperforms in his job or is a moderate worker is none of govt concern !!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 387
Re: The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Sep 2014, 05:44
jullysabat wrote:
The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby boomers will create an unprecedented opportunity to move significant numbers of people into career-track jobs at family-supporting incomes. Major industries, from health care and construction to automotive repair, will soon face deep shortages of workers as a result of projected growth and boomer retirements. Fortunately, many of these jobs have relatively low barriers to entry and could be filled by out-of-work young people. To achieve this result, the city government should convene employers and educators to determine how best to create paths of upward mobility in these fields.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?
A) Immigration reform will limit the pool of available workers.
B) Government efforts have been shown to affect employment trends only rarely.
C) The best available positions require skills not possessed by the vast majority of the unemployed.
D) A small proportion of baby boomers will not retire as soon as is anticipated.
E) Many out-of-work young people are unaware of these looming employment opportunities.

Can someone please explain the reasoning???
I am stuck....

Guys, can someone explain why the answer is B?
If the potential employees aren't aware, than nothing will help.
I vote for E.
Can someone help with this?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1064
Location: United States
Premium Member
Re: The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Sep 2014, 00:22
ronr34 wrote:
jullysabat wrote:
The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby boomers will create an unprecedented opportunity to move significant numbers of people into career-track jobs at family-supporting incomes. Major industries, from health care and construction to automotive repair, will soon face deep shortages of workers as a result of projected growth and boomer retirements. Fortunately, many of these jobs have relatively low barriers to entry and could be filled by out-of-work young people. To achieve this result, the city government should convene employers and educators to determine how best to create paths of upward mobility in these fields.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?
A) Immigration reform will limit the pool of available workers.
B) Government efforts have been shown to affect employment trends only rarely.
C) The best available positions require skills not possessed by the vast majority of the unemployed.
D) A small proportion of baby boomers will not retire as soon as is anticipated.
E) Many out-of-work young people are unaware of these looming employment opportunities.

Can someone please explain the reasoning???
I am stuck....

Guys, can someone explain why the answer is B?
If the potential employees aren't aware, than nothing will help.
I vote for E.
Can someone help with this?


Hello ron

Please read the blue part above. The argument just says to achieve the results, the city government must have a very important role - convene employers and educators to determine how best to create paths of upward mobility. It means the argument just focus on government's role. Thus, the plan won't be achieved if the government impacts very rarely on employment trend. => B is correct.

How about E? Very tempting but if you just focus on key idea "government's role om employment trend", you will see how E is not correct. Assume young people are unaware of employment opportunities, but government affects on employment trend very well, so those young people will have better chances of getting job. The KEY is they are unaware does not mean they will not be affected by government's effect. If the effect is good, young people will be affected positively. Thus, E does not weakens the argument.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 112
Re: The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2015, 21:06
Definitely not E.

D can weaken but it weakly weakens. It's a possible choice.

B.... well, my take on this answer choice is that the government only convenes or assembles employers and educators to take advantage of employment prospects. They don't necessarily do the heavy lifting. Though, it is still considered a government effort, so there's not much to expect the city government to do to create jobs. Thus, the conclusion is undermined - if the government is usually ineffective at increasing employment, then what good does it do for the gov't to step in? Answer is B.
Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 592
Schools: Cambridge'16
Re: The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2015, 23:09
Conclusion: City government should convene employers and educators to determine how best to create paths of upward mobility in these fields

option E beats assumption that young people know about job opportunity. But conclusion does not say about existing or looming opportunities, rather it says that mobility (enter, exit) should be provided

I chose B
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 12 Jun 2014
Posts: 61
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
GPA: 3.65
WE: Law (Non-Profit and Government)
The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Sep 2015, 12:28
A) Not relevant
B) YES, if government efforts are ineffective then it would not make sense to achieve any result through a government effort
C) That’s exactly why the program is needed
D) Not relevant
E) Not relevant and this is something the government effort could technically help with
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 528
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Feb 2017, 01:30
'Government efforts affect employment trends only rarely' doesn't mean that it will not affect in this case also.
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Director
Director
avatar
P
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 653
Location: India
Schools: Rotman '20 (S)
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
Re: The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2017, 11:27
hogann wrote:
The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby boomers will create an unprecedented opportunity to move significant numbers of people into career-track jobs at family-supporting incomes. Major industries, from health care and construction to automotive repair, will soon face deep shortages of workers as a result of projected growth and boomer retirements. Fortunately, many of these jobs have relatively low barriers to entry and could be filled by out-of-work young people. To achieve this result, the city government should convene employers and educators to determine how best to create paths of upward mobility in these fields.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?

A. Immigration reform will limit the pool of available workers.
B. Government efforts have been shown to affect employment trends only rarely.
C. The best available positions require skills not possessed by the vast majority of the unemployed.
D. A small proportion of baby boomers will not retire as soon as is anticipated.
E. Many out-of-work young people are unaware of these looming employment opportunities.


My reasoning:

By POE B is the best ...but none of them really look promising ..On can argue that it is not necessary that if govt failed previously , it would fail now also ..
A-- nothing mentioned about immigrants in the argument..
B-keep
C-may be best available position is only 5, 10 ..rest require less skills..
D-10 /1000 will retire late --does not harm he argument
E-govt is making effort to make out of work ppl aware about these jobs(conclusion of argument)

We can easily eliminate rest choice and can mark B ...i think on 1st glance most of us will skip B ... :)
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 16 Oct 2015
Posts: 74
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: ISB '19, IIMA , IIMB, IIMC
GMAT 1: 520 Q44 V17
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 710 Q48 V40
GPA: 3.45
WE: Research (Energy and Utilities)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2017, 11:45
Answer B is correct.
Underlying assumption is after convening the educators and employers plan will work out.
Option B negates the underlying assumption

Sent from my MI 3W using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 652
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2017, 21:05
The argument concludes that the city should convene a conference of relevant parties to create opportunities for out of work young people.

1. Immigration reform will limit the pool of available workers. -
INCORRECT : THIS STRENGTHENS THE ARGUMENT BY SHOWING THERE WILL BE SHORTAGE OF AVAILABLE WORKERS

2. Government efforts have been shown to affect employment trends only rarely.
CORRECT : WEAKENS THE ARGUMENT BY SHOWING THAT EVEN WHEN THE CAUSE OCCURS (govt efforts) the EFFECT DOES NOT OCCUR

3. The best available positions require skills not possessed by the vast majority of the unemployed.
INCORRECT : THIS IS CLEARLY OUT OF SCOPE, ARGUMENT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY ABOUT 'BEST AVAILABLE POSITIONS' but POSITIONS IN GENERAL

4. A small proportion of baby boomers will not retire as soon as is anticipated.
INCORRECT : THIS ACTUALLY STRENGTHENS THE ARGUMENT BY INFERRING THAT THERE MIGHT NOT B A 'DEEP SHORTAGE OF WORKERS'

5. Many out-of-work young people are unaware of these looming employment opportunities.
INCORRECT : THIS AGAIN STRENGTHENS THE ARGUMENT
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 537
Premium Member
Re: The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2017, 10:52
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Please Read: Verbal Posting Rules

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2922
Premium Member
Re: The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2018, 12:41
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

-
April 2018: New Forum dedicated to Verbal Strategies, Guides, and Resources

Re: The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby &nbs [#permalink] 03 Sep 2018, 12:41

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   [ 54 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

The anticipated retirement of tens of thousands of baby

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.