Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 11:38 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 11:38

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 244
Own Kudos [?]: 4417 [38]
Given Kudos: 325
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Other
GPA: 2.44
WE:Project Management (Telecommunications)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 79
Own Kudos [?]: 203 [6]
Given Kudos: 101
Send PM
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Posts: 782
Own Kudos [?]: 2583 [5]
Given Kudos: 5
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2014
Status:Retaking GMAT
Posts: 144
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Human Resources
GMAT 1: 610 Q49 V24
GPA: 3
WE:Information Technology (Human Resources)
Send PM
Re: The Canadian elk has traditionally been limited in its geographic rang [#permalink]
I marked C. How can E be correct? It talks about southern part and not northern.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Nov 2013
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 193 [0]
Given Kudos: 63
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
Send PM
Re: The Canadian elk has traditionally been limited in its geographic rang [#permalink]
Argument : { elderberry growth in North --> increase Canadian elk’s territory }: Weaken it

A) loganberries - not related
B) many Canadian elk are hunted - doesn't matter, even if few elks are now able to move along and cover the new area then argument still is valid.(not a weakener).

C) The grizzly bear, moving north - doesn't mean it will actually do some harm (unless we assume something more )

D) The permafrost region, will unlikely see elderberry growth - note unlikely (so close, but not 100% sure), hence not a solid weakener.

E) Increasing temperatures have created conditions too warm for elderberry growth in the southern half of the Canadian elk’s traditional territory. - Note in this case its sure and certain that elderberry growth in south is not possible (not using unlikely as in D) -- Correct

Ans: E
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 63
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Re: The Canadian elk has traditionally been limited in its geographic rang [#permalink]
increase in range means that the starting point is fixed and the ending point moves up the line.

Which of the following, if true, best casts doubt on the argument?

A)In addition to elderberry, the Canadian elk also consumes loganberries, which are expected to also begin growing at more northerly latitudes.
This gives us no reason to believe that the range will not increase
B)During the summer months, many Canadian elk are hunted both for sport and for their meat.
no reason whyy the range will not increase
C)The grizzly bear, the Canadian elk’s primary predator, has also started moving north into the tundra.
Increase in range yea./nah dunno

D)The permafrost, the region above the tundra, in which the temperatures never reach above freezing, will unlikely see elderberry growth.
where is this region far far away in the north. i dunno Increase or decrease no idea.
E)Increasing temperatures have created conditions too warm for elderberry growth in the southern half of the Canadian elk’s traditional territory.

for range to not increase if it moves up. the starting point will also move up. therefore wither the range is less or the same but it does not increase
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1030
Own Kudos [?]: 1779 [0]
Given Kudos: 2562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Send PM
Re: The Canadian elk has traditionally been limited in its geographic rang [#permalink]
each of option choices in this question contains the common pattern that keeps appearing in other CR questions. The issue here is the key word. Here, "overall range" is what makes E correct.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1267
Own Kudos [?]: 5649 [2]
Given Kudos: 416
Send PM
Re: The Canadian elk has traditionally been limited in its geographic rang [#permalink]
2
Kudos

Official Explanation
Answer: (E)



The argument is that the elk’s territory will grow because the elderberry, its primary food source, is expected to grow further north. (E) calls this conclusion into question because if elderberries can no longer grow in the southern half of the elk’s territory, then the elk's range has been truncated. There is no information concerning how far north the new territory will reach.

(A) suggests that elk will be very well provided for, diet-wise, as they move into the tundra.

(B) is just a general fact that does not relate to the argument.

(C) may be tempting but remember that just because the grizzly bear will continue to prey on the elk as it moves into the tundra does not mean there will be no elk in the tundra.

(D) is out of scope because the argument only concerns the tundra, not the area north of the tundra.

FAQ: Can you explain choice A a bit more?

A: (A) reads: In addition to elderberry, the Canadian elk also consumes loganberries, which are expected to also begin growing at more northerly latitudes.

The key here is that another of the elk's food sources is going to grow in the north. This simply strengthens the argument that the elk's range will increase (into the north).

In order to weaken the argument, we need to look for a reason that the elk's range would actually not increase. (A) does not provide such a reason -- it provides another reason why the elk's range will increase.

FAQ: Can you explain choice C a bit more?

A: (C) may be tempting, but remember that just because the grizzly bear will continue to prey on the elk as it moves into the tundra does not mean there will be no elk in the tundra. The grizzly bears will not stop the elk from moving north. Rather, the grizzly bear would follow the elk north. The elk's range would still expand into new regions.

FAQ: What about D?

A: This isn't negating the facts of the passage. The passage says the elderberries have spread into the TUNDRA, but (D) is talking about ABOVE the tundra...in other words, even farther north of the tundra.

So the elderberries are still spreading. (D) doesn't contradict this, it just puts one kind of limit on how far/how much the elderberries and therefore the elk could spread. But this doesn't weaken the argument that the elk's territory will increase at least to some degree. They are still spreading to part of the tundra.
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1115
Own Kudos [?]: 2162 [0]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: The Canadian elk has traditionally been limited in its geographic rang [#permalink]
Imagine that the Elk are in the centre of a circle and their range is the radius.

The Elk's range would decrease or stay the same if berry growth in the south remains unchanged.
Current Student
Joined: 05 Nov 2020
Posts: 81
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 57
Location: Dominican Republic
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
GPA: 3.91
Send PM
Re: The Canadian elk has traditionally been limited in its geographic rang [#permalink]
Hi - I got E in 1:40 seconds.

What level is this? 700 or 600? trying to understand the difficulty to see where I stand.

thank u very much
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2020
Posts: 66
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 30
Send PM
Re: The Canadian elk has traditionally been limited in its geographic rang [#permalink]
Though the official explanation is fair enough but it would not be east job to opt for E easily as the option talks about southern part and most of the times such answer choices are opted out due to- out of context thought !

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2021
Posts: 121
Own Kudos [?]: 81 [0]
Given Kudos: 48
Location: India
The Canadian elk has traditionally been limited in its geographic rang [#permalink]
The Canadian elk has traditionally been limited in its geographic range by the presence of elderberries, its primary source of food, which only grow up until a certain point in the tundra. A recent rise in temperatures, however, has seen a spread in the growth of elderberries northwards into the tundra. Therefore, the overall range of the Canadian elk can be expected to increase.

Which of the following, if true, best casts doubt on the argument?

It's important that the argument's conclusion be kept in perspective , while analysing the options (using POE). The conclusion of the Argument is : overall RANGE of the Canadian elk can be expected to increase.

Let's now use the POE method to nalyse the options one by one..


A. In addition to elderberry, the Canadian elk also consumes loganberries, which are expected to also begin growing at more northerly latitudes.

Out of scope, since the conclusion is based on increase in Range of Canadian Elk on basis of elderberries as their primary source of food, and NOT loganberries



B. During the summer months, many Canadian elk are hunted both for sport and for their meat.

Just a piece of additional information..doesn't affect the conclusion in any manner.



C. The grizzly bear, the Canadian elk’s primary predator, has also started moving north into the tundra.

Canadian elk's survival primarily depends on its access to elderberries, which now grow northwards..Predators' movement northwards may mildly affect but not restrict the movement of Canadian elk, since the old 'survival techniques' employed against the predators will enable the Canadian elks to save themselves from predators. Strengthens the argument's conclusion, hence doesn't cast any doubt.



D. The permafrost, the region above the tundra, in which the temperatures never reach above freezing, will unlikely see elderberry growth.

Irrelevant, since region above the tundra is not being discussed to reach the conclusion.



E. Increasing temperatures have created conditions too warm for elderberry growth in the southern half of the Canadian elk’s traditional territory.
If the southern half of Canadian elk’s traditional territory is too warm to affect survive, then it's evident that the Canadian elk's move northwards in search of elderberries will not lead to an overall increase of the range of Canadian elk..in turn, negating the argument's conclusion that the overall range of the Canadian elk can be expected to increase.


Hence, (E) is the correct choice


Hope this helps
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17205
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The Canadian elk has traditionally been limited in its geographic rang [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The Canadian elk has traditionally been limited in its geographic rang [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne