The candy manufacturer's claim that employee : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 Feb 2017, 21:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The candy manufacturer's claim that employee

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 80
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2011, 10:01
B is the answer
Manager
Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Posts: 196
Location: United States
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT Date: 10-16-2013
GPA: 3
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 244 [0], given: 886

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2011, 10:16
B is the right answer.
Option A actually strengthens the passage.
Options C,D and E are irrelevant in the context.
_________________

Kudos me if you like my post !!!!

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 271
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V31
GPA: 3
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 27

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2011, 08:47
The answer is B since the answer mentions "non-employees"
_________________

petrifiedbutstanding

Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 109
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 15

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2011, 17:43
joemama142000 wrote:
The candy manufacturer's claim that employee "theft" costs the company thousands of dollars a year in potential sales is greatly overstated. Most of the candy eaten on the job and not paid for is eaten one piece at a time, by workers who would not be willing to buy an entire box of it anyway.

Which of the following if true, most weakens the argument above?

(A) The workers eat only defective candies that could not be sold
(B) Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees
(C) A few workers account for most of the candy that is eaten but not paid for.
(D) Most of the candies eaten by employees are consumed during the holiday season, when production outputs are at their highest
(E) The amount of candy eaten by employees is only a small fraction of the candy sold by the company

B. It explains why the conclusion is not overstated.
Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 176
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 6

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2011, 01:17
IMO B
Manager
Status: Prepping for the last time....
Joined: 28 May 2010
Posts: 200
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 21

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2011, 06:40
Good question mate.. B is ans.
_________________

Two great challenges: 1. Guts to Fail and 2. Fear to Succeed

Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2011
Posts: 189
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 21

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2011, 08:56
yup... definately B.. good question.. but 4 easily discardable answers made the cr easy overall
Manager
Joined: 12 Jul 2011
Posts: 151
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 42

Re: CR candy manufacturer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2011, 21:13
B for me
took me 63 seconds !
Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 97
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Nov 2011, 21:08
B
Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Posts: 78
Schools: INSEAD,IIMA,IIMB
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2011, 22:34
B
_________________

_________________________
Try and you will succeed !

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 307
Followers: 529

Kudos [?]: 1005 [2] , given: 2

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2012, 10:21
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
The candy manufacturer's claim that employee "theft" costs the company thousands of dollars a year in potential sales is greatly overstated. Most of the candy eaten on the job and not paid for is eaten one piece at a time, by workers who would not be willing to buy an entire box of it anyway.

Which of the following if true, most weakens the argument above?

(A) The workers eat only defective candies that could not be sold

If the workers eat only those candies that wouldn't be sold, then the argument is strengthened. After all, the company doesn't stand to make any profit from candies it would have thrown away.

(B) Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees

The argument says that the idea it is losing money to candy-gobbling employees is overstated. Well, if all of the candy eaten by employees represents lost sales, then the case isn't overstated. The company is losing money to this "theft." Therefore (B) weakens the argument.

(C) A few workers account for most of the candy that is eaten but not paid for.

Doesn't really address whether the claim is overstated.

(D) Most of the candies eaten by employees are consumed during the holiday season, when production outputs are at their highest

Well imagine that most of this candy is defective, i.e., it would not have sold anyways. Regardless of what season it is, the argument would not be weakened.

(E) The amount of candy eaten by employees is only a small fraction of the candy sold by the company

This seems to match up with the part of the argument that says the claim is overstated.
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

Intern
Joined: 01 Jul 2013
Posts: 10
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 20

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2013, 07:51
Answer should be B.. since it showing potential sales lost to the company..
Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 174
Concentration: Technology, Other
Schools: Haas
GMAT Date: 01-14-2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 41

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2013, 09:42
Conclusion : Candy Manufacturers claim of losses through theft exceeds potential sales is false .
Premise : Candy eaten would not lead to potential sales because
Candy eaten on the job and not paid for, is eaten one piece at a time by workers who would not buy the whole box.

Assumption : Potential customers ( non employees) wont buy single candy , they would only purchase boxes !!

Weaken the Assumption saying : Potential customers will buy single candy ... is rephrased by B
"Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees"

Hope this helps !!
Manager
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 225
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 34

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2013, 03:42
Straight B, if you can pre-think this one.

the argument says that the candies are eaten by workers who would not be willing to buy it, but this could hurt sales as non employees could obviously buy those that are being consumed by workers.
_________________

--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.

Intern
Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [1] , given: 2

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2013, 02:45
1
This post received
KUDOS
IMO B is the correct answer.
That was easy, it took me 50 secs.
Intern
Joined: 30 Apr 2011
Posts: 49
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 29

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2013, 17:44
B for sure, no doubt
Intern
Joined: 19 Jul 2013
Posts: 5
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 5

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2014, 01:22
I would go for B since directly weakens the argument by stating that those eaten candies might have increased the profits.
Intern
Joined: 02 Mar 2013
Posts: 3
GPA: 3.64
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 10

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2014, 21:03
joemama142000 wrote:
The candy manufacturer's claim that employee "theft" costs the company thousands of dollars a year in potential sales is greatly overstated. Most of the candy eaten on the job and not paid for is eaten one piece at a time, by workers who would not be willing to buy an entire box of it anyway.

Which of the following if true, most weakens the argument above?

(A) The workers eat only defective candies that could not be sold
(B) Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees
(C) A few workers account for most of the candy that is eaten but not paid for.
(D) Most of the candies eaten by employees are consumed during the holiday season, when production outputs are at their highest
(E) The amount of candy eaten by employees is only a small fraction of the candy sold by the company

Can you pls explain why the answer is not A?
Intern
Joined: 15 Nov 2011
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 16

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jun 2014, 15:49
joemama142000 wrote:
The candy manufacturer's claim that employee "theft" costs the company thousands of dollars a year in potential sales is greatly overstated. Most of the candy eaten on the job and not paid for is eaten one piece at a time, by workers who would not be willing to buy an entire box of it anyway.

-Emp. theft = lost revenue
-piece by piece consumption (slow)
C: losses are greatly overstated

Which of the following if true, most weakens the argument above?

(A) The workers eat only defective candies that could not be sold --- strengthens; if workers are eating the damaged inventory there wouldn't be losses.
(B) Candy eaten by employees represents lost potential sales to non-employees --- weakens; if employees eat candy that could be sold then there are losses b/c revenue is being lost as the quantities for sale are suppressed. Best so far!
(C) A few workers account for most of the candy that is eaten but not paid for. --- passage makes note of slow pace at which candy is eaten. Therefore, even if "select" employees are responsible for all of the damage they're not eating at a fast enough pace. Neither here nor there
(D) Most of the candies eaten by employees are consumed during the holiday season, when production outputs are at their highest. --- at busy season less inventory = greater losses. Strengthen!
(E) The amount of candy eaten by employees is only a small fraction of the candy sold by the company. --- despite being a small portion it could still be a large portion of potential sales. Irrelevant.
Manager
Joined: 28 May 2014
Posts: 64
Schools: NTU '16
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V27
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 31

Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2014, 22:32
How does A strengthen? Please explain. I believe A weakens
Re: The candy manufacturer's claim that employee   [#permalink] 10 Aug 2014, 22:32

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 43 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 QOTD #2 Pharmaceutical manufacturers have long claimed that one of the 4 31 May 2016, 07:26
5 Drug manufacturer 10 01 Nov 2012, 05:55
7 Cigarette companies claim that manufacturing both low- and 4 28 Sep 2012, 03:38
Airplane manufacturer 1 07 Jul 2009, 07:38
The candy manufacturer's claim that employee "theft* 13 22 Jul 2008, 11:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The candy manufacturer's claim that employee

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.