It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 10:33

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 20 Nov 2011
Posts: 37

Kudos [?]: 37 [1], given: 5

GMAT Date: 05-28-2012
GPA: 3.23
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2011, 06:30
1
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

55% (00:36) correct 45% (00:57) wrong based on 224 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees should retain all pensions indefinitely or be allowed to cash them in at retirement.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 37 [1], given: 5

Manager
Joined: 13 Jul 2011
Posts: 140

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 42

Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2011, 07:59
I think the correct answer is B,
as "be retained ... " is parallel to "be allowed.."
can you please post OE ??

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 42

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 889

Kudos [?]: 718 [0], given: 44

Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2011, 10:34
Gavan wrote:
The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees should retain all pensions indefinitely or be allowed to cash them in at retirement.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions

Choice B change the meaning and make the pronoun "them" refer wrong antecedent. "all pensions" cannot "be allowed to cash".

Correct choice is E
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Kudos [?]: 718 [0], given: 44

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2010
Posts: 281

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2011, 01:46
+1 for E for ||

to retain || to cash

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 1

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 889

Kudos [?]: 718 [0], given: 44

Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2011, 20:37
prab wrote:
+1 for E for ||

to retain || to cash

Nope, to retain not parallel with to cash. If those two verb are ||, how can you explain with "be". Just see the pronoun "them" in underlined part. "them" in choice B have clearer antecedent "pensions" instead of "employees". If use choice B, the non-underlined part will become "pensions be allowed to cash them (pensions or employees) in at retirements.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Kudos [?]: 718 [0], given: 44

Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2011
Posts: 240

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 36

Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V36

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2011, 21:09
Gavan wrote:
The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees should retain all pensions indefinitely or be allowed to cash them in at retirement.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions

be allowed to cash them -> suggests that employees needs to be the subject
B, C and D out

E is the only option that treats employees to retain and employees be allowed - idiomatic and parallel

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 36

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 May 2011
Posts: 300

Kudos [?]: 288 [0], given: 11

WE 1: IT 1 Yr
WE 2: Supply Chain 5 Yrs

### Show Tags

28 Dec 2011, 00:22
||. looking for to/be retain. B has wrong pronoun reference. E.

Kudos [?]: 288 [0], given: 11

Senior Manager
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 434

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 181

Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2015, 07:49
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees should retain all pensions indefinitely or be allowed to cash them in at retirement.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions

If we split the sentence according to choice E, we get,

1. The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring employees to retain all pensions
2. The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring employees be allowed to cash pensions in at retirement

As I know,
There are two possible constructions after ‘require’. One is ‘someone requires someone else to do something’, the other is the uses in subjunctive.

Split 1: Follows the 1st uses of 'require'
Split 2: Tries to follow the second uses of 'require', but misses subjunctive 'that'. Is it correct?

Correct me if I am wrong.
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 181

Director
Joined: 24 Nov 2015
Posts: 586

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 231

Location: United States (LA)
Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2016, 04:48
confused between choices B and E
choice B uses passive voice whereas E uses active voice.
I think that gmat uses active voice whereever possible
correct me if i am wrong

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 231

Chat Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 574

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 139

Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2016, 06:25
I am not sure I understood the explanation.

Could someone please post the OE?

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 139

Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3148

Kudos [?]: 3280 [0], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2016, 09:19
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
warriorguy wrote:
I am not sure I understood the explanation.

Could someone please post the OE?

In command subjunctive mood, the verb in it's raw form is to be used. Command subjunctive is used for certain "bossy" verbs such as "demand", "require" etc.

I demand that you go there... right
I demand that you should go there... wrong

A: Because of wrong usage of command subjunctive (as described above), A is wrong.

B: Option B uses command subjunctive correctly (though in passive voice) - However the requirement is from employees, not from pensions. Therefore "employees" should be the subject of the clause in subjunctive mood.

C: Use of gerund with "requiring" is awkward. The requirement is from employees, not from retaining.

D: The requirement is from employees, not from retention.

Kudos [?]: 3280 [0], given: 22

Chat Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 574

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 139

Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2016, 10:49
sayantanc2k wrote:
warriorguy wrote:
I am not sure I understood the explanation.

Could someone please post the OE?

In command subjunctive mood, the verb in it's raw form is to be used. Command subjunctive is used for certain "bossy" verbs such as "demand", "require" etc.

I demand that you go there... right
I demand that you should go there... wrong

A: Because of wrong usage of command subjunctive (as described above), A is wrong.

B: Option B uses command subjunctive correctly (though in passive voice) - However the requirement is from employees, not from pensions. Therefore "employees" should be the subject of the clause in subjunctive mood.

C: Use of gerund with "requiring" is awkward. The requirement is from employees, not from retaining.

D: The requirement is from employees, not from retention.

Now that I think about the options - its clear to be - the form is bossy verb + that + subject + Command Sub:

Subject should be employees and not pension -

As usual, thanks sayantanc2k

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 139

Intern
Joined: 02 Mar 2015
Posts: 15

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.51
Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2016, 16:57
warriorguy wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
warriorguy wrote:
I am not sure I understood the explanation.

Could someone please post the OE?

In command subjunctive mood, the verb in it's raw form is to be used. Command subjunctive is used for certain "bossy" verbs such as "demand", "require" etc.

I demand that you go there... right
I demand that you should go there... wrong

A: Because of wrong usage of command subjunctive (as described above), A is wrong.

B: Option B uses command subjunctive correctly (though in passive voice) - However the requirement is from employees, not from pensions. Therefore "employees" should be the subject of the clause in subjunctive mood.

C: Use of gerund with "requiring" is awkward. The requirement is from employees, not from retaining.

D: The requirement is from employees, not from retention.

Now that I think about the options - its clear to be - the form is bossy verb + that + subject + Command Sub:

Subject should be employees and not pension -

As usual, thanks sayantanc2k

I have the same doubt, why ''that' is missing in the correct answer?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Chat Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 574

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 139

Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2016, 01:13
DML88 wrote:

I have the same doubt, why ''that' is missing in the correct answer?

Hi DML88,

Require can take either of the two forms - infinitive (to) and command subjunctive form: IF you observe option e then the form is "to" form.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions

Other verbs which can infinitive and command subjunctive are : ask, intend, beg, order, urge.

I hope that helps.

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 139

Intern
Joined: 02 Mar 2015
Posts: 15

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.51
Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2016, 04:46
warriorguy wrote:
DML88 wrote:

I have the same doubt, why ''that' is missing in the correct answer?

Hi DML88,

Require can take either of the two forms - infinitive (to) and command subjunctive form: IF you observe option e then the form is "to" form.

a)that employees should retain all pensions
b)that all pensions be retained by employees
c)the retaining by employees of all pensions
d)employee's retension of all pensions
e)employees to retain all pensions

Other verbs which can infinitive and command subjunctive are : ask, intend, beg, order, urge.

I hope that helps.

Thank you! It is clear now and also make more sense in the question. Answer (E) keeps the meaning.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: The CEO has proposed a new policy requiring that employees   [#permalink] 04 Sep 2016, 04:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by