GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Aug 2018, 01:58

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The CEO of Burberry, Angela Ahrendts, who has built some incredibly te

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3188
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
V11-41  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Dec 2017, 06:47
chaudhurysr wrote:
OA is E, but I think E is incorrect, for 2 reasons.

1. Simple past must indicate an event that began and ended in the past at a particular time. So if the sentence said: "... joined apple last month"... that would have been correct. Instead the sentence says "joined apple". If we remove all unwanted stuff from the sentence, we will get "The CEO of Burberry joined Apple". This is incorrect!! It should either say "The CEO of Burberry has joined Apple" (present perfect), or "The CEO of Burberry joined Apple last month" (simple past).

2. The sentence uses lots of clauses, and the three events are presented in three different clauses. e.g.

"had built ...." - clause 1
"has been influential ... " - clause 2
"joined apple ... " - clause 3

The OE is trying to link events in clause 1 and 3 to indicate the past perfect-simple past relation. I am not sure if this is correct. Event in clause 1 and clause 3 are not related. Let's take an example:

Ex1: "Ram, who had finished his dinner, went to bed". This is incorrect!
Even if we correct error related to simple past and say...

Ex2: "Ram, who had finished his dinner, went to bed an hour ago". This is still incorrect.

Ex3: Ram, who had finished his dinner by the time I arrived, went to bed an hour ago".
Here, "by the time" is linking two events together (Ram's dinner and my arrival), and hence this example is correct.


IMO, all the 5 answer choices are incorrect.

Experts - Please let me know your comments!!


1. Simple past "joined" is alright. The action "joining" started and completed in the past. (Do not get confused between the action "joining" and the action "working" - it does not matter whether Angela is still working for Apple - the action "joining" started and completed the very first day she worked for Apple.) Introducing a time reference (e.g., "last month") is not necessary to use simple past.

2. Past perfect "had built" is also alright. Use of past perfect is still required when the verbs are in different clauses.

The Ex1 you mentioned is wrong for a different reason altogether. When the sequence of event is already understood, then the use of past perfrect is unneccesary. I parked the car and went inside the shop... past perfect not required.
It is alright to say:
Ram, who had scored incredibly high scores in GMAT, did not do well in GRE... this is alright because the sequence of GMAT and GRE is clarified only by the use of past perfect.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Jan 2017
Posts: 75
Re: The CEO of Burberry, Angela Ahrendts, who has built some incredibly te  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Dec 2017, 10:32
I see your point Sayantanc2k. Thank you for clarifying! In my mind I was indeed processing "joined" in a present perfect tense... action started in the past but continued till present. Also thanks for clarifying about the clauses. Makes sense to me!
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Jun 2017
Posts: 43
Re: The CEO of Burberry, Angela Ahrendts, who has built some incredibly te  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2018, 07:53
'WHERE' is used appropriately here
E is the ans
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Jan 2018
Posts: 11
The CEO of Burberry, Angela Ahrendts, who has built some incredibly te  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Apr 2018, 05:07
mikemcgarry

'influential on fashion industry', I don't think this is gramatically correct. 'has influence on the fashion industry' is correct but 'influential on fashion industry' just sounds horribly wrong & looks gramatically incorrect. It should be 'she is influential in the fashion industry'.

I crossed out E because of this & chose C because 'influencing the fashion industry' looks much better.
The CEO of Burberry, Angela Ahrendts, who has built some incredibly te &nbs [#permalink] 05 Apr 2018, 05:07

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 24 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

The CEO of Burberry, Angela Ahrendts, who has built some incredibly te

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.