It is currently 24 Nov 2017, 00:46

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Apr 2006, 20:58
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by constucting canals so that the water now empties into the Mississippi by way of the Illinois River.

A.

B. Rivers had originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but they had been redirected by constucting

C. Rivers, which originally flowed into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan but have been redirected by the construction of

D. Rivers, originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, but having been redirected by the construction of

E. Rivers, originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan, have been redirected through the construction of

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Location: India
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Apr 2006, 21:02
Straight E.
If we remove the clause ' originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan ', the remaining sentence
'Calumet Rivers .........have been redirected ' still makes sense.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1337

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Apr 2006, 21:14
buzzgaurav wrote:
Straight E.
If we remove the clause ' originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan ', the remaining sentence
'Calumet Rivers .........have been redirected ' still makes sense.


agree with you that OA should be E.

but "originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan" is not a clause. its a phrase.

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Location: India
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Apr 2006, 21:17
Professor wrote:
buzzgaurav wrote:
Straight E.
If we remove the clause ' originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan ', the remaining sentence
'Calumet Rivers .........have been redirected ' still makes sense.


agree with you that OA should be E.

but "originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan" is not a clause. its a phrase.


Slip of tongue, oops :oops: .
Guess my hangover is still not over.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1337

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Apr 2006, 21:23
buzzgaurav wrote:
Professor wrote:
buzzgaurav wrote:
Straight E.
If we remove the clause ' originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan ', the remaining sentence
'Calumet Rivers .........have been redirected ' still makes sense.


agree with you that OA should be E.

but "originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan" is not a clause. its a phrase.


Slip of tongue, oops :oops: .
Guess my hangover is still not over.


how do you say that that was your toung slip cuz u were not speaking but only drinking and smiling? :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Apr 2006, 19:28
OA is E

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Current Student
User avatar
B
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Apr 2006, 21:34
Late, but (E). v~ing phrases are often tested on the GMAT.

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Apr 2006, 22:31
Question: Whats the difference between CLAUSE and PHRASE?!!! :cry:

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Location: India
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Apr 2006, 22:45
A phrase is a group of words acting as a single part of speech and not containing both a subject and a verb. It is a part of a sentence, and does not express a complete thought.

Whereas a clause is a group of words containing a subject and verb. A clause is either a whole sentence or in effect a sentence-within-a-sentence.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Apr 2006, 04:17
Very late, but E.

buzzgaurav wrote:
A phrase is a group of words acting as a single part of speech and not containing both a subject and a verb. It is a part of a sentence, and does not express a complete thought.

Whereas a clause is a group of words containing a subject and verb. A clause is either a whole sentence or in effect a sentence-within-a-sentence.


Nice explanation by buzzraghav!
Adding to what he said, in this context: 'originally flowing into the St. Lawrence by way of Lake Michigan'

verb - flowing
object - St. Lawrence
subject - ?

Thats why this is a phrase and not a clause.

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 21 Apr 2006, 04:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The Chicago and Calumet Rivers originally flowed into the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.