It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 09:23

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The cities with the densest population have the highest

Author Message
Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 910

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

The cities with the densest population have the highest [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2007, 23:39
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 3 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The cities with the densest population have the highest ratio of police officers to citizens. Such cities also have the lowest rates of property crime without contact between perpetrator and victim. Thus maintaining a high ratio of police officers to citizens can serve as an effective deterrent to at least certain kinds of property crime.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
(A) The quality of training that police receive varies from city to city.
(B) High population density itself makes it difficult to commit a property crime that involves no contact between perpetrator and victim.
(C) Many nonviolent crimes in large cities are drug-related.
(D) A majority of the perpetrators of property crimes in densely populated cities are not apprehended by the police.
(E) Property crimes without contact between perpetrator and victim represent only a small proportion of overall crime.

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 454

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - dense population [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2007, 23:56
beckee529 wrote:
The cities with the densest population have the highest ratio of police officers to citizens. Such cities also have the lowest rates of property crime without contact between perpetrator and victim. Thus maintaining a high ratio of police officers to citizens can serve as an effective deterrent to at least certain kinds of property crime.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
(A) The quality of training that police receive varies from city to city.
(B) High population density itself makes it difficult to commit a property crime that involves no contact between perpetrator and victim.
(C) Many nonviolent crimes in large cities are drug-related.
(D) A majority of the perpetrators of property crimes in densely populated cities are not apprehended by the police.
(E) Property crimes without contact between perpetrator and victim represent only a small proportion of overall crime.

E.

Because if E is true, deploying a higher number of police officers can no longer be effective.

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 851

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2007, 01:20
I think its B as it provides an alternate reason why the property crimes are less.

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 1098

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

Location: London

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2007, 05:42
B

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 211

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2007, 13:59
B.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 90

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2007, 14:20
B - It gives high population density as the reason for low crime rate in the given case, instead of high police officers to citizen ratio.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 857

Kudos [?]: 330 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2007, 14:31
B for sure. It's giving the real explanation for the low rate of property crime.

Kudos [?]: 330 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 910

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2007, 20:18
good job. OA is B

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1545

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2007, 05:03
Hold on ... whats wrong with D ?

As for B, maybe I just didnt understand it, but isnt D saying that because of the already existing high density, it is difficult for criminals to commit a property crime and have no contact with the victim ?

The statement says that the rates for this type of crime are low already, and D seems to just support that, not weaken it :-S

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 169

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2007, 10:09
straight B

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

08 Aug 2007, 10:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by