It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 17:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The city council will certainly vote to approve the new

Author Message
SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1534

Kudos [?]: 279 [0], given: 0

The city council will certainly vote to approve the new [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2008, 03:33
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The city council will certainly vote to approve the new downtown redevelopment plan, despite the objections of environmentalists. After all, most of the campaign contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan.
Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Several members of the city council receive sizable campaign contributions from environmental lobbying groups.
(B) Members of the city council are required to report the size and source of each campaign contribution they receive.
(C) Not every real estate development firm in the city will be able to participate in, and profit from, the new downtown redevelopment plan.
(D) The members of the city council have often voted in ways that are opposed to the interests of their campaign contributors.
(E) Some environmentalists have stated that the new downtown redevelopment plan might be environmentally sound if certain minor modifications are made.

Kudos [?]: 279 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 414

Kudos [?]: 460 [0], given: 14

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2008, 04:12
is it C

Kudos [?]: 460 [0], given: 14

Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 99

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2008, 16:59
Clear D.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2008
Posts: 100

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2008, 20:13
(C)
_________________

Kick GMAT ass

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 1

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2009, 14:50
scthakur wrote:
The city council will certainly vote to approve the new downtown redevelopment plan, despite the objections of environmentalists. After all, most of the campaign contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan.
Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Several members of the city council receive sizable campaign contributions from environmental lobbying groups.
(B) Members of the city council are required to report the size and source of each campaign contribution they receive.
(C) Not every real estate development firm in the city will be able to participate in, and profit from, the new downtown redevelopment plan.
(D) The members of the city council have often voted in ways that are opposed to the interests of their campaign contributors.
(E) Some environmentalists have stated that the new downtown redevelopment plan might be environmentally sound if certain minor modifications are made.

D to me.

We need some thing that says CC will not approve new plan

D says contributions do not force votes.

Bingo!

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 426

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 4

Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2009, 23:15
Another D.

An answer choice that would undermine the reasoning - just because X receives funds from Y, means X will vote for Y - will be true. D says, even though X receives funds from Y doesn't necessarily mean the votes will go to Y

Cheers,
Unplugged

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 4

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 276

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 2

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2009, 01:20
icandy wrote:
scthakur wrote:
The city council will certainly vote to approve the new downtown redevelopment plan, despite the objections of environmentalists. After all, most of the campaign contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan.
Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Several members of the city council receive sizable campaign contributions from environmental lobbying groups.
(B) Members of the city council are required to report the size and source of each campaign contribution they receive.
(C) Not every real estate development firm in the city will be able to participate in, and profit from, the new downtown redevelopment plan.
(D) The members of the city council have often voted in ways that are opposed to the interests of their campaign contributors.
(E) Some environmentalists have stated that the new downtown redevelopment plan might be environmentally sound if certain minor modifications are made.

D to me.

We need some thing that says CC will not approve new plan

D says contributions do not force votes.

Bingo!

Agree with D. C is irrelevant because it makes no difference if some, most, or all receive benefits. If the answer choice stated that none of the real estate development firms in the city will participate and benefit then you can consider C as a potential answer.

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 2

VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1258

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2009, 04:10
it shld be D
scthakur wrote:
The city council will certainly vote to approve the new downtown redevelopment plan, despite the objections of environmentalists. After all, most of the campaign contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan.
Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Several members of the city council receive sizable campaign contributions from environmental lobbying groups.
(B) Members of the city council are required to report the size and source of each campaign contribution they receive.
(C) Not every real estate development firm in the city will be able to participate in, and profit from, the new downtown redevelopment plan.
(D) The members of the city council have often voted in ways that are opposed to the interests of their campaign contributors.
(E) Some environmentalists have stated that the new downtown redevelopment plan might be environmentally sound if certain minor modifications are made.

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 487

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 13

Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon
Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2009, 14:26
Hi mates,

IMO D

Quote:
The city council will certainly vote to approve the new downtown redevelopment plan, despite the objections of environmentalists. After all, most of the campaign contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan.
Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Several members of the city council receive sizable campaign contributions from environmental lobbying groups.
(B) Members of the city council are required to report the size and source of each campaign contribution they receive.
(C) Not every real estate development firm in the city will be able to participate in, and profit from, the new downtown redevelopment plan.
(D) The members of the city council have often voted in ways that are opposed to the interests of their campaign contributors.
(E) Some environmentalists have stated that the new downtown redevelopment plan might be environmentally sound if certain minor modifications are made.

B, C and E out: they don't have nothing to do with the argument

Between A and D... well, it took me a while to decide between them. I think the point is the word "several" in A, which can mean majority or not

OA and Source?

Cheers
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html

I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me

I'm already focused on my application package

My experience in my second attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312
My experience in my third attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 13

Intern
Joined: 29 Jan 2009
Posts: 13

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2009, 15:03
D .

Whats the OA?

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2009, 19:33
The city council will certainly vote to approve the new downtown redevelopment plan, despite the objections of environmentalists. After all, most of the campaign contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan.
Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Several members of the city council receive sizable campaign contributions from environmental lobbying groups.
(B) Members of the city council are required to report the size and source of each campaign contribution they receive.
(C) Not every real estate development firm in the city will be able to participate in, and profit from, the new downtown redevelopment plan.

(D)The members of the city council have often voted in ways that are opposed to the interests of their campaign contributors.
(E) Some environmentalists have stated that the new downtown redevelopment plan might be environmentally sound if certain minor modifications are made.

Among A and D, D is definitely stronger since it definitely breaks the main reasoning of the argument. A is not strong enough, so what if env lobbyists also give money...most still come from real estate.

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 27 May 2008
Posts: 200

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2009, 20:37
Another D

conclusion "city council will certainly vote to approve the new downtown redevelopment plan"

premise: campaign contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan

D - if taken as premise will weaken the conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 102

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 2

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2009, 21:28
Another D.

(A) Several members of the city council receive sizable campaign contributions from environmental lobbying groups.

For A we need to assume that favor of the city council is proportional to the contributions.
A is out because of this.

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 426

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 4

Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2009, 22:16
Can we have the OA?

Cheers,
Unplugged

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 4

Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 635

Kudos [?]: 637 [0], given: 6

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2009, 01:00
Yeah D stands clear.
_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

Kudos [?]: 637 [0], given: 6

SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1534

Kudos [?]: 279 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2009, 01:13
OA is D.

Kudos [?]: 279 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 3: Downtown Redevelopment   [#permalink] 02 Feb 2009, 01:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by