It is currently 26 Jun 2017, 05:24

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The city government should invest surplus funds in improving

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Sep 2010
Posts: 31
Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Oct 2010, 12:35
Had to decide between A & E.

B. I didn't see any opposition
C. No proposal.
D. Nothing stated that would lead me to think that the problem was overlooked.

A fits better for me because it does describe the current state of affairs as the system was put in place before and "If the city does not make changes soon" is a prediction.

I have to go with A.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 77
Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Sep 2011, 22:46
A..
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2012
Posts: 104
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, Real Estate
GMAT Date: 10-22-2012
GMAT ToolKit User
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2012, 00:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city’s transportation network. Most of the
network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population.
The
subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient.
If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries
relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city’s financial health will be jeopardized.
In
the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
• The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.
• The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author’s conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
• The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem.
• The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes
that situation.
• The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

Last edited by aditi1903 on 14 Oct 2012, 08:06, edited 1 time in total.
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Jul 2011
Posts: 111
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2012, 08:24
2
This post received
KUDOS
IMO A, though E also seems to be a good option.

I think the problem with E is that it uses the word "consequence" for the second bold part while option A uses the word "prediction". I think the second bold part is more of a prediction as consequence is something which is certain (given the stated conditions are met) while prediction is something which is likely but not certain

Please let me know in case I am missing something.
BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 885
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2012, 08:30
I guess choice B is the correct one. The 1st bold is is, in fact, the plan of action the city are doing. And if without the first, there will be have consequence as the 2nd bold sentence said. All of these are said in choice B.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 511
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Oct 2012, 02:38
+1 E

BF1 – It gives justification for the problem

Problem – The subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient.

BF2 – It gives consequences of the problem

:-D
_________________

First Attempt 710 - http://gmatclub.com/forum/first-attempt-141273.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: exam is close ... dont know if i ll hit that number
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 196
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 10-09-2012
GPA: 3.2
Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Oct 2012, 08:45
i would go with A
because E states the second bold face as the consequence which is incorrect..
its just prediction the author is making about future consequences...
_________________

just one more month for exam...

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 May 2012
Posts: 56
GMAT Date: 09-10-2012
Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Oct 2012, 05:41
aditi1903 wrote:
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city’s transportation network. Most of the
network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population.
The
subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient.
If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries
relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city’s financial health will be jeopardized.
In
the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
• The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.
• The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author’s conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
• The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem.
• The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes
that situation.
• The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.



Stmt 1: The city govt should invest in transportation network-------Why------------Reason or justification is------------Most of the
network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population

Stmt 2: If the problem is not solved-----------consequences are----Many of its prized industries
relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city’s financial health will be jeopardized.

+1 E

hth
3 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2011
Posts: 295
Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Oct 2012, 21:59
3
This post received
KUDOS
aditi1903 wrote:
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city’s transportation network. Most of the
network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population.
The
subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient.
If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries
relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city’s financial health will be jeopardized.
In
the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
• The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.
• The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author’s conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
• The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem.
• The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes
that situation.
• The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.


I'll go with A.

WHY NOT E?
1st part is not impending problem (impending problem means a problem yet to occur and soon to occur, but the problem is already there (Most of the
network was put in place at a time), expressed correctly in Answer A
2nd is not consequences of that problem, it is a caution that is If u don't do X then Y will happen ( expressed correctly in Answer A)

WHY NOT B?
2nd bold face is not the conclusion. the conclusion is "The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city’s transportation network."

I guess other answer choices can be eliminated too for the aforementioned reasons.

Wordup!

HTH
Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 511
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2012, 00:24
Jp27 wrote:
aditi1903 wrote:
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city’s transportation network. Most of the
network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population.
The subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient. If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city’s financial health will be jeopardized.
In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A) The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.

E) The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.


I'll go with A.

WHY NOT E?
1st part is not impending problem (impending problem means a problem yet to occur and soon to occur, but the problem is already there (Most of the network was put in place at a time), expressed correctly in Answer A
2nd is not consequences of that problem, it is a caution that is If u don't do X then Y will happen ( expressed correctly in Answer A)


Good Point Jp27

Problem/Current State of Affairs is - The subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient.
BF2 - If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city’s financial health will be jeopardized. (Consequence and prediction are both right. Although Prediction is better, I have no reason to believe that consequence is wrong. Any thoughts?)

Bone of contention should therefore be BF1

BF1 - Most of the network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population (This is not the problem, but a reason as to why the aforementioned problem/current state of affair exists. Your reasoning to prove BF1 wrong in E is flawed as you have considered BF1 to be the problem whereas in option it takes BF1 to be the justification/reason for the problem. But yes, you are right in pointing out the “impending” situation (+1 to you))

Why I think A is wrong is because BF1 is not an explanation OF the problem but explanation FOR the problem. Anyways nice point Jp. Keep it up.

Aditi OA and explanation please.
:-D
_________________

First Attempt 710 - http://gmatclub.com/forum/first-attempt-141273.html

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 161
WE 1: Information Technology(Retail)
Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2012, 11:53
Ans is A.

First statement is a fact/evidence.
Second statement is a prediction.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2012
Posts: 7
Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Oct 2012, 04:05
I agree with JP, though I still think second BF is the easiest and quickest way to solve this.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Posts: 400
Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Oct 2012, 07:13
i also chose E..

Jp27 wrote:
aditi1903 wrote:
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city’s transportation network. Most of the
network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population.
The
subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient.
If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries
relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city’s financial health will be jeopardized.
In
the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
• The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.
• The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author’s conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
• The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem.
• The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes
that situation.
• The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.


I'll go with A.

WHY NOT E?
1st part is not impending problem (impending problem means a problem yet to occur and soon to occur, but the problem is already there (Most of the
network was put in place at a time), expressed correctly in Answer A
2nd is not consequences of that problem, it is a caution that is If u don't do X then Y will happen ( expressed correctly in Answer A)

WHY NOT B?
2nd bold face is not the conclusion. the conclusion is "The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city’s transportation network."

I guess other answer choices can be eliminated too for the aforementioned reasons.

Wordup!

HTH


after above quoted post.. i l go with A..impending mean..problem will occur..so agree with A..
_________________

Bole So Nehal.. Sat Siri Akal.. Waheguru ji help me to get 700+ score !

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10160
Premium Member
Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2014, 13:43
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
MBA Section Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 3807
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Boldface Revision: The city government should invest surplus funds [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Mar 2015, 23:45
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
This question is part of the GMAT Club Critical Reasoning: Boldface Revision Project.

The city government should invest surplus funds in improving the city’s transportation network. Most of the network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in both area and population. The subway system is outdated and understaffed. The buses rarely run on schedule and their routes are inconvenient. If the city does not make changes soon to the network, it will see many of its prized industries relocate to more convenient cities and, as a result, the city’s financial health will be jeopardized. In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.

B. The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author’s conclusion; the second is that conclusion.

C. The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem.

D. The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes that situation.

E. The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.
_________________

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
Veritas Prep Live Online

Chat Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 697
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
Schools: Sloan '18 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V41
GPA: 4
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Boldface Revision: The city government should invest surplus funds [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Mar 2015, 12:26
I think the right answer is A. Wait for OA.
_________________

If my post was helpful, press Kudos. If not, then just press Kudos !!!

Expert Post
MBA Section Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 3807
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Boldface Revision: The city government should invest surplus funds [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2015, 20:01
The conclusion of the argument is that the city will see many of its prized
industries relocate to more convenient cities and the city's financial health will be
jeopardized if the city does not make changes soon to the transportation network.
This is also the second bolded sentence. The first bolded sentence states that
most of the network was put in place at a time when the city was much smaller in
both area and population. We need to find a choice that correctly describes both
of these bolded statements.

(A) CORRECT. This choice states that the first statement is an explanation of a
current state of affairs. This explanation is consistent with the passage. The
answer choice goes on to describe the second bolded statement as a prediction
based on that state of affairs. This is also consistent with the passage: the
second bolded statement predicts what will happen as a result of the inadequacy
of the current transportation network.

(B) The first statement is indeed a statement of fact, but the author cites it in
order to bolster his or her claim; thus the statement is not in opposition to the
conclusion. The second statement is the conclusion of the argument.

(C) The first statement does not "emphasize an existing problem" but rather
explains that existing problem (of an overtaxed subway). Moreover, the second
statement does not "offer a proposal to solve that problem" but rather warns of
what will happen if the problem is not solved.

(D) The first statement arguably presents information that "the author suggests
has been overlooked in the situation at hand"; however, the second statement
does not describe that situation, but rather proposes a hypothetical outcome in
the future.

(E) The first statement is not really "justification" (a term that implies approval on
the part of the author) but rather an "explanation"; nor does it refer to an
"impending problem" but rather an existing problem. Also, the second statement
does not describe "consequences" exactly but rather "potential consequences" if
the problem is left unchecked.
The correct answer is A.
_________________

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
Veritas Prep Live Online

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10160
Premium Member
Re: The city government should invest surplus funds in improving [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2015, 04:35
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
G
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2524
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Stanford '20
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Boldface Revision: The city government should invest surplus funds [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Dec 2015, 19:36
oh, wow... applying @e-gmat strategy for bold-faced questions has improved my accuracy on such questions up to 90-100% This is incredible.

the first portion is an explanation why the city's infrastructure is bad. The second, arranged to look like a conclusion, is nothing more than a prediction of what might happen.
A. The first is an explanation of a current state of affairs; the second is a prediction based on that state of affairs.
looks good.
B. The first is a statement of fact in opposition to the author’s conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
the first statement is definitely not in opposition of the author's conclusion. It rather points out a fact that the author believes can lead to negative consequences. B is out.

C. The first emphasizes an existing problem; the second offers a proposal to solve that problem.
while the first part looks tempting, although the first portion is more of a explanation, the second part definitely does not offer a proposal to solve the problem. C is out.

D. The first is information the author suggests has been overlooked in the situation at hand; the second describes that situation.
first portion - no. it is not something that has been overlooked. It is something that is known to be true. A fact that the author uses to make the prediction. Furthermore, the second one does not describe the "situation overlooked" in the first portion. D is out.

E. The first is a justification of an impending problem; the second describes the consequences of that problem.
well well well..this is a really tempting one...The second one describes negative consequences of the problem, so it is good. Nevertheless, the first one is not a justification, instead, it is an explanation of why the problem exists. E is out.

Thus, A is the best option.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 110
Re: Boldface Revision: The city government should invest surplus funds [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Dec 2015, 10:53
One question. Isn't the first statement actually a conclusion?

Perhaps irrelevant, but just for the benefit of all that picked E: if there was an answer choice like "The first is a conclusion; the second is a prediction based on the state of affairs," what would be a better answer?
Re: Boldface Revision: The city government should invest surplus funds   [#permalink] 08 Dec 2015, 10:53

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 47 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Boldface Revision: The city government should invest surplus funds souvik101990 0 08 Dec 2015, 15:16
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic The stated goal of the government's funding program for the arts is to Gmat1008 4 15 Dec 2016, 01:38
6 Experts publish their posts in the topic Advisor: The government of city of Benzaria should discontinue the req egmat 4 21 May 2014, 11:58
Government funding for the arts must be increased if we vivtai 6 26 Nov 2012, 05:01
The city government should invest surplus funds in improving aditi1903 0 08 Jun 2017, 14:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The city government should invest surplus funds in improving

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.