It is currently 21 Sep 2017, 21:40

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Aug 2011
Posts: 49

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2011, 06:37
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

75% (01:02) correct 25% (01:14) wrong based on 355 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for $20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the city's low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.

The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?

a) Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increase

b) Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.

c) The outlay of $10.00for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus riders

d) The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the city's bus system

e) Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Apr 2008
Posts: 191

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 1

Re: GWD(1) [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2011, 12:16
C - the assumption is that $10 is not prohibitive for the low income people. After reading the question, I was looking for an answer that's along the lines of "low income people don't have the cash flow to buy $20 in fares at once" but this answer is not amongst the choices given.

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 1

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 103

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 15

Re: GWD(1) [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2011, 09:53
Jasontuyj2012 wrote:
The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to $1.25, proposed that 18 fare token be sold for $20.00 to alleviate the extra burden of the fare increase on the city's low-income residents. Critics suggested alternatively that 9 fare tokens be sold for $10.00, because a $20.00 outlay would be prohibitive for low-income riders.

The alternative proposal depends on which of the following assumptions?

a) Low-income residents of Workney will continue to ride the buses in the same numbers despite the fare increase

b) Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offer than would other riders.

c) The outlay of $10.00for the purchase of 9 fare tokens would not be prohibitive for low-income bus riders

d) The proposed fare increase is needed for the purchase of new buses for the city's bus system

e) Buses provide the only means of public transportation in the city of Workney.


C. The critics assume a $10.00 outlay would not be prohibitive otherwise no reason for them to propose a $10.00 outlay.

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 15

Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 31 Jul 2015
Posts: 35

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 13

Location: India
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2017, 07:48
Jasonammex wrote:
Why B is not right?


B) Low-income riders would be more likely to take advantage of the savings afforded by the 9-token offerthan
would other riders
.

A per critics , 18-token for $20 would be prohibitive of the lower income riders. In other words , all types of riders should get equal advantage. No bias .
So, they assumed that the 9-token scheme will not pose any problem for the lower income riders.
Reading once, option B seems to be the perfect contender. However, as highlighted, the 9-token scheme offer is more beneficial to the low-income riders than the other riders. Therefore, this makes the 9-token scheme biased towards the low income riders.

I hope you get it now.
_________________

Never give up !

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 13

Re: The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to   [#permalink] 14 Mar 2017, 07:48
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
54 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a nitya34 46 20 Sep 2017, 01:12
25 From 1994 to 2001, violent crime in New York City steadily carcass 24 17 Aug 2017, 13:24
5 Of the people who moved from one city to another when they elegan 5 24 Apr 2017, 01:27
11 Bus company president: A city councilman has stated his x97agarwal 38 17 Jul 2016, 03:15
2 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Fares on the city-run public buses in Greenville are vaivish1723 9 25 Dec 2013, 00:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The city of Workney, in raising bus fares from $1.00 to

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.