It is currently 23 Sep 2017, 09:37

# Happening Now:

Alleviate MBA app anxiety! Come to Chat Room #2

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The city's public transportation system should be removed

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 351

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 1

The city's public transportation system should be removed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 May 2006, 11:47
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:13) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 15 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The city's public transportation system should be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government, which finds it politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service. If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.
The statements above best support the conclusion that

A the private firms that would handle public transportation would have experience in the transportation industry

B political considerations would not prevent private firms from ensuring that revenues cover operating costs

C private firms would receive government funding if it were needed to cover operating costs

D the public would approve the cost-cutting actions taken by the private firm

E the municipal government would not be resigned to accumulating merely enough income to cover costs

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 1

VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399

Kudos [?]: 217 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 May 2006, 12:09
1
KUDOS
A (no indication of that in the argument) NO

B (I think this is an assumption, not conclusion, but not sure)

C (the whole argument is about transferring the system to private, so why should government be involved?) NO

D (if the public doesnâ€™t approve the actions of the firmâ€¦ say they wouldnâ€™t support the rise in fare, then firms are not likely to get profits and cover its operating costs, so argument falls apart using negation)

E (again, nothing about private firms and cutting the costs) NO

Therefore, I am b/w B and D, but leaning towards D since the using assumption-negation technique the argument falls apartâ€¦

Kudos [?]: 217 [1], given: 0

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1116

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 1

Location: India

### Show Tags

30 May 2006, 19:36
B............. political considerations would not prevent private firms from ensuring that revenues cover operating costs

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 1

SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1728

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

30 May 2006, 21:52
Will go with B.

The conclusion supports the facts mentioned in the statements the goverments cover up the inefficiency by diverting more funds whereas private funds whose utmost importance is profit wil try to maximise revenues to cover the costs.

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5039

Kudos [?]: 425 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

30 May 2006, 22:02
Go with B. The passage appears to suggests that the municipal government has its hands tied with respect to the decision to raise fare or implement cost cutting programs.

With B, it says the private firms will have only one objective --> ensuring that revenus cover operating cost.

Kudos [?]: 425 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 258

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 May 2006, 09:31
i choose B too.

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399

Kudos [?]: 217 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 May 2006, 10:00
hm... nobody for D? this is an inference question, so does D infer too much or going beyond the scope of the argument?

zoom612, do you have OE?

thanks

Kudos [?]: 217 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2893

Kudos [?]: 316 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008

### Show Tags

31 May 2006, 10:27
I will go with D.

I feel B is a trap answer. Thats an assumption not the conclusion.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 316 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 351

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

31 May 2006, 12:03
The OA is B.
Although i had chosen C,as the last line says...

If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.

Can someone explain,why not C??

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 10 Nov 2005
Posts: 35

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: India

### Show Tags

31 May 2006, 14:53
Cannot be C because C is an inference not a conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399

Kudos [?]: 217 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 May 2006, 15:21
harinder_sandhu wrote:
Cannot be C because C is an inference not a conclusion.

how can you infer that government is going to cover operating costs if it's agenda was to transfer such burden on private firms? I think C is just moving in a completely opposite direction from the argument and not even hinting about conclusion/inference!

Kudos [?]: 217 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 176

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Jun 2006, 09:44
B is right.

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 May 2005
Posts: 137

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Jun 2006, 05:12
hey .. b it is ... the political bindings create a barrier and private firms are very much away from the range thus ..political considerations would not bother them much and they wud go with the required hike in fares etc ..
_________________

--I never think of future, it comes soon enough!!

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10174

Kudos [?]: 254 [0], given: 0

Re: The city's public transportation system should be removed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2017, 04:32
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 254 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 14 Sep 2016
Posts: 91

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 28

Re: The city's public transportation system should be removed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2017, 06:00
The best answer is "B" since it clearly talks about the hindrance that is faced by the government i.e political issues where as private firm would not consider this issue.

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 28

Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2015
Posts: 204

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 35

GPA: 3.31
Re: The city's public transportation system should be removed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Mar 2017, 11:37
The city's public transportation system should be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government, which finds it politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service. If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.

'If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued.'
That means- the private firm will overcome the difficulty -
"politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service"

Clear - B.

The statements above best support the conclusion that

A the private firms that would handle public transportation would have experience in the transportation industry

B political considerations would not prevent private firms from ensuring that revenues cover operating costs

C private firms would receive government funding if it were needed to cover operating costs

D the public would approve the cost-cutting actions taken by the private firm

E the municipal government would not be resigned to accumulating merely enough income to cover costs
_________________

In case you find my posts helpful, give me Kudos. Thank you.

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 35

Re: The city's public transportation system should be removed   [#permalink] 24 Mar 2017, 11:37
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 A smart city integrates all modes of transport, 2 07 Feb 2016, 09:21
1 City transportation - CR Assumption Man 6 tests 1 15 Oct 2015, 14:52
1 Winston: The Public Transportation Authority (PTA) cannot 3 24 Nov 2015, 01:00
2 We should abolish the public education system and allow schools to ope 2 02 Sep 2017, 23:41
2 A city s public transportation board has decided to cut 8 26 Feb 2015, 01:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The city's public transportation system should be removed

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.