It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 09:29

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2006
Posts: 144

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2007, 05:32
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The commission acknowledged that [u]no amount of money or staff members[/u] can ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant, but it approved the installation because it believed that all reasonable precautions had been taken.
(A) no amount of money or staff members
(B) neither vast amounts of money nor staff members
(C) neither vast amounts of money nor numbers of staff members
(D) neither vast amounts of money nor a large staff
(E) no matter how large the staff or how vast the amount of money

~Good explanations are welcome!

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 506

Kudos [?]: 243 [0], given: 0

Location: Indonesia

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2007, 06:13
I will go with D for parallelism and conciseness

regards,

Amardeep

Kudos [?]: 243 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2007
Posts: 68

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 1

Re: SC - Vast amounts of money [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2007, 06:48
(A) no amount of money or staff members
Here, the word amount is common for money and staff members. You can't use "amount" for people.
(B) neither vast amounts of money nor staff members
Staff members are not quantified here. So not parallel with "vast amounts of money".
(C) neither vast amounts of money nor numbers of staff members
Again, staff members are not quantified here. So not parallel with "vast amounts of money".
(D) neither vast amounts of money nor a large staff
It should be the correct option.
(E) no matter how large the staff or how vast the amount of money
Though there is parallelism in this part, the rest of the sentence does not go with it.

I too vote for D.

Last edited by rakesh.id on 11 Apr 2007, 07:33, edited 2 times in total.

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2007
Posts: 68

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2007, 06:57
By the way, is there a way to edit your posts?

Last edited by rakesh.id on 11 Apr 2007, 07:34, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 272

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2007, 07:16
D for conciseness and parallelism

Yes you can edit your post, click on the button beside "quote" on your post
_________________

AimHigher

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 327

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2007, 08:21
(A) amount only for noncountable > staff members is countable
(B) same mistake, 'staff members' lacks 'number of'
(C) numbers of is unidiomatic, it must be a number of members or the number of members
(E) makes no sense, because it introduces a contrast that is not given in the sentence.
(D) is the right answer, because amounts of money nor a large staff does not violate the rule of non- and countable.

Best regards & cheers!

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 327

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2007, 08:22
(A) amount only for noncountable > staff members is countable
(B) same mistake, 'staff members' lacks 'number of'
(C) numbers of is unidiomatic, it must be a number of members or the number of members
(E) makes no sense, because it introduces a contrast that is not given in the sentence.
(D) is the right answer, because amounts of money nor a large staff does not violate the rule of non- and countable.

Best regards & cheers!

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1340

Kudos [?]: 833 [0], given: 10

Re: SC - Vast amounts of money [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2007, 18:01
querio wrote:
The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members can ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant, but it approved the installation because it believed that all reasonable precautions had been taken.
(A) no amount of money or staff members
(B) neither vast amounts of money nor staff members
(C) neither vast amounts of money nor numbers of staff members
(D) neither vast amounts of money nor a large staff
(E) no matter how large the staff or how vast the amount of money

~Good explanations are welcome!

which of the following is correct usage?Pls explain.
1.No X or Y
2.No X and Y
3.No X and No Y
3.No X or No Y

Kudos [?]: 833 [0], given: 10

Re: SC - Vast amounts of money   [#permalink] 12 Apr 2007, 18:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.