The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Feb 2017, 05:43

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 332
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2004, 20:13
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (01:01) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members can ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant, but it approved the installation because it believed that all reasonable precautions had been taken.
(A) no amount of money or staff members
(B) neither vast amounts of money nor staff members
(C) neither vast amounts of money nor numbers of staff members
(D) neither vast amounts of money nor a large staff
(E) no matter how large the staff or how vast the amount of money

which one is better?

B or D. and why?
If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Posts: 444
Location: Cary,NC
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2004, 21:04
I am going with D.

The idiom is "neither X nor Y"

here X and Y both need a qualifier and need to be parallel.

D gives a qualifier to both X and Y. B doesnt have a qualifier for Y.
_________________

ash
________________________
I'm crossing the bridge.........

Manager
Joined: 19 Jul 2004
Posts: 75
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2004, 03:36
I go with B..D distorts the meaning....why do we need large staff....the original sentece tends to convey that the existing staff members cannot prevent.....

anyone else??
_________________

To Strive, To Seek and Not to Yield

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 402
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2004, 04:12
(B) is wrong,

(D) is best.

Original sentence intend to say that large number of staff member also cannot prevent, while this fact is not established in choice (B).

(D) also maintains parallelism
Manager
Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 151
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2004, 08:48
Guys-

I am confused with the usage of "large staff"..How can we use "large" with a countable name like "staff" ?

Please shed some light on this..

Souldn't we want something like "number of" ...?
Manager
Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 151
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2004, 06:13
afife76 wrote:
Guys-

I am confused with the usage of "large staff"..How can we use "large" with a countable name like "staff" ?

Please shed some light on this..

Souldn't we want something like "number of" ...?

Anybody?
Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2004
Posts: 171
Location: Noida, UP
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2004, 06:31
what the sentence means is something like this.
"The commission feels that no matter how much money you spend, or how many staff members you have, its difficult to ensure the safety of people....

Only D properly states (without any grammatical mistake) this fact (of large number of stall members)....
_________________

--

./abisurd
Not absurd

Director
Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 593
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 125 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2004, 08:29
afife76 wrote:
Guys-

I am confused with the usage of "large staff"..How can we use "large" with a countable name like "staff" ?
Please shed some light on this..
Souldn't we want something like "number of" ...?

Staff = group of employees/workforce (uncountable quantity). So large staff still means large group of employees/large workforce...

Does this help?
Intern
Joined: 31 Mar 2004
Posts: 8
Location: Buffalo
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2004, 11:14
Formally, staff in this sense can be either singular or plural: The generalâ€™s staff agree [agrees] on the new strategy. Or, in a complex organization, you might talk about the headquarters staffs, meaning two or more such groups at headquarters. Functionally, staff can also be a verb, meaning â€œto provide with staff,â€
Director
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 577
Location: San Jose, CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2004, 15:35
I think the ans is D and go with the same logic as Ash.
The use of large staff is correct. Staff means a group of people
Re: SC - commision   [#permalink] 24 Jul 2004, 15:35
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Acknowledging the volunteers’ giving of a great deal 2 01 Feb 2015, 03:46
3 Outsourcing is widely acknowledged as one of the best 7 04 Jun 2010, 02:07
4 The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff 19 10 Jun 2009, 22:58
Since John Locke acknowledged authorship of his political 3 09 Jan 2008, 07:40
The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff 7 11 Apr 2007, 04:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by