Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 22:09 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 22:09

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2437
Own Kudos [?]: 1682 [154]
Given Kudos: 210
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 May 2014
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 270 [44]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [6]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Posts: 547
Own Kudos [?]: 298 [6]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: Oxford
Schools:Oxford'10
 Q49  V37
Send PM
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
6
Kudos
yavasani wrote:
Guys, why is B wrong ?


Hi Yavasani,

B is wrong because "foods" does not agree with "has" in number. we need "have" here.
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 783 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
1
Kudos
____________________________
Guys, why is B wrong ?

Originally posted by yavasani on 09 May 2008, 06:29.
Last edited by Bunuel on 29 Apr 2023, 01:59, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 654
Own Kudos [?]: 1574 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
bsd_lover wrote:
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word natural to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized.

A. or nothing that has been

B. or that has been

C. and nothing that is

D. or anything that has been

E. and anything


I went with D here.
I believe "or" is correct. If you use "and", the food can be "neutral" if it has one of those three. I don't believe this is the intended meaning.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 783 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
2
Kudos
foods that do not contain X, Y, or Z. Eliminates C & E. Between B & D. My pick is B is for concision. I am not sure if D is gramatically incorrect.

bsd_lover wrote:
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word natural to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized.

A. or nothing that has been

B. or that has been

C. and nothing that is

D. or anything that has been

E. and anything
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Status:Mission GMAT
Posts: 56
Own Kudos [?]: 202 [3]
Given Kudos: 41
Send PM
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Between A and D how does D win?

In short, how does double negative work here?

I can understand that it would be correct if the sentence is

The commission....foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or synthesized materials.

However, how does the not in 'foods that do NOT CONTAIN' act on 'or anything thet has been synthesized"?

'Or anything that has been synthesized' is not 'not contained' in the foods.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 124
Own Kudos [?]: 294 [2]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
2
Kudos
I have chosen the answer D in this case:

A. The use of the word "nothing" is incorrect. It seems to create a double negative, but we are suggesting that we don't want ingredients that have been synthesized, not the reverse.

B. It is confusing to me what the last "that" refers to. Also, if the last "that" refers to foods, then it should be "have been" and not "has been."

C. The use of the word "or" is correct because any of the 3 elements present in food would mean that the food is not natural. By using the word "and" we are saying that all 3 are required before the food is not natural. Also, "nothing" creates a double negative similar to answer choice A.

D. The use of the word "or" is correct in this case and the meaning of this answer choice makes sense.

E. "And" is used incorrectly here.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 107
Own Kudos [?]: 206 [2]
Given Kudos: 47
Send PM
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
bsd_lover wrote:
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word natural to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized.

A. or nothing that has been

B. or that has been

C. and nothing that is

D. or anything that has been

E. and anything


A) incorrectly uses "nothing", which makes the sentence a double negative given that the underline is preceded by "foods that do NOT contain".

B) "or that has been" improperly focuses on synthesized foods, which is not the intended meaning of the author. The intended meaning is that the CONTENTS of food should not be X, Y and Z..

C) Again with the double negative, WRONG

D) "anything" focuses on contents of food and not food in itself. Thus this is better than B (and correct). Also, notice that anything does not create an error with double negatives. CORRECT

E) Uses the word "anything" correctly but, just like B, focuses on foods and NOT contents of foods. Thus, wrong.


Also, (I didn't think of this when I answered, but I do now!) the initial and/or split is paramount; "and" breaks the parallelism of the sentence, "or" upholds it. So right off the bat you should eliminate all options that do not start with "or".

Alternatively, "and" creates an additional unwanted trait of food contents (that are added to the previously stated contents), which is not the intent of the author. The author doesn't mean to say that "foods that do NOT contain perservatives AND anything synthesized", rather "anything synthesized" needs to be its own "entity", thus and is wrong and or is correct.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Feb 2014
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 57 [0]
Given Kudos: 81
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 610 Q46 V28
Send PM
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
I don't see any expert comments here. Request Verbal experts - Please reply.

D is correct answer - I get it. It sounds right too. Not awkward ...etc.
But meaning and grammar based analysis - I was only able to remove B. What about other choices - What are the incorrect?
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Feb 2014
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 57 [1]
Given Kudos: 81
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 610 Q46 V28
Send PM
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Thanks Manyu!


Also found awesome e-GMAT explanation!

markers-in-parallelism-139076.html
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Mar 2016
Posts: 48
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Send PM
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
Can anyone explain why do we need a prefect tense 'has' in D here? Had the 'E' option been "Or anything" would be correct? P
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [3]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
jjindal wrote:
Can anyone explain why do we need a prefect tense 'has' in D here? Had the 'E' option been "Or anything" would be correct? P


Yes that would be correct. In that case "synthesized" would be a past participle acting as an adjective for "anything".

Why present perfect is a suitable option here: At the time of taking the decision whether to restrict, the action "synthesize" has been completed, but the effect of synthesis is still present, i.e. the decision whether to restrict still depends on the action "synthesize".

Nonetheless, a simple present would also be alright here, though the meaning would be slightly different.
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word "natural" to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized.

Are the three things ( color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized) sign of "NATURAL".
Thanks...
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
iMyself wrote:
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word "natural" to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized.

Are the three things ( color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized) sign of "NATURAL".
Thanks...


No they are not, but foods that DO NOT contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or anything that has been synthesized are.
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
sayantanc2k wrote:
iMyself wrote:
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word "natural" to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, [b]or nothing that has been synthesized.[/b]

Are the three things ( color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized) sign of "NATURAL".
Thanks...


No they are not, but foods that DO NOT contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or anything that has been synthesized are.

That means: the word "natural" is LIMITED. If the food contains color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or anything that has been synthesized, we can't use "natural" in those foods, right?
But, the main sentence says another meaning. 'Natural' is restricted to those foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical blah blah blah..... .That means: if my food contains color or flavor, chemical preservatives, blah blah blah then 'natural' is NOT restricted-I'm allowed to use 'natural' in those foods. What do you think brother. Am I right?
Also, why or is used here. If someone used and here, will there be any problem in meaning?
Thanks...
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [4]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
iMyself wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
iMyself wrote:
The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word "natural" to foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, [b]or nothing that has been synthesized.[/b]

Are the three things ( color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized) sign of "NATURAL".
Thanks...


No they are not, but foods that DO NOT contain color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or anything that has been synthesized are.

That means: the word "natural" is LIMITED. If the food contains color or flavor additives, chemical preservatives, or anything that has been synthesized, we can't use "natural" in those foods, right?
But, the main sentence says another meaning. 'Natural' is restricted to those foods that do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical blah blah blah..... .That means: if my food contains color or flavor, chemical preservatives, blah blah blah then 'natural' is NOT restricted-I'm allowed to use 'natural' in those foods. What do you think brother. Am I right?
Also, why or is used here. If someone used and here, will there be any problem in meaning?
Thanks...


Brother, I am not sure what you mean by "if my food contains color or flavor, chemical preservatives, blah blah blah then 'natural' is NOT restricted-I'm allowed to use 'natural' in those foods." It seems that you have a wrong understanding of the sentence. The sentence means that the use of the word "natural" is restricted to only those foods that do not contain those certain items - i.e. if the food contains those items, then the word "natural" canNOT be used.

The reason that "and" cannot be used comes from the logical equations:

NOT (A and B) = NOT A or NOT B
NOT (A or B) = NOT A and NOT B

If the above is not clear, then let me explain in words.

The food that does not contain (X, Y AND Z)

The statement implies that the food may still contain (only X) or (only Y) or (only Z) or (any combination of two of them) - the only thing that the food must not contain is all the three items together. However this is not the intended meaning.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42103 [3]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
The correct way to parse this sentence is this way: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the word natural to foods that do not contain (A. color or flavor additives, (or) B. chemical preservatives, or C anything that has been synthesized.)
You can see now why anything that has been synthesized is gelling with the rest of the list. The text implies that even if one of the items is found to be used in the food, that food can't be marked as natural. This invalidates the use of 'and' in the choice.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Sep 2019
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 73
Send PM
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
Hi, Could anyone help me with this? I wonder if answer "or anything" would be correct here? I supposed yes, it is
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The commission has directed advertisers to restrict the use of the wor [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne