Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

 It is currently 16 Jul 2019, 13:39

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# The controversial restructuring plan for the county school district

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SC Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1746
The controversial restructuring plan for the county school district  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2018, 07:04
1
1
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

72% (01:01) correct 28% (01:11) wrong based on 104 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The controversial restructuring plan for the county school district, if it is approved by the governor, would make there be fewer teachers in schools throughout the county.

A. if it is approved by the governor, would make there be fewer teachers
B. if the governor approves it, would result in the amount of teachers going down
C. if the governor approves it, would have the result of decreasing the number of teachers
D. if approved by the governor, would result in a reduction of the number of teachers
E. if approved by the governor, would decrease teachers

_________________
Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2 | How to Improve GMAT Quant from Q49 to a Perfect Q51 | Time management

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases | Subjunctive Mood
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Jan 2017
Posts: 300
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The controversial restructuring plan for the county school district  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2018, 07:12
2
aragonn wrote:
The controversial restructuring plan for the county school district, if it is approved by the governor, would make there be fewer teachers in schools throughout the county.

A. if it is approved by the governor, would make there be fewer teachers
B. if the governor approves it, would result in the amount of teachers going down
C. if the governor approves it, would have the result of decreasing the number of teachers
D. if approved by the governor, would result in a reduction of the number of teachers
E. if approved by the governor, would decrease teachers

+1 for D

A. if it is approved by the governor, would make there be fewer teachers
B. if the governor approves it, would result in the amount of teachers going down
C. if the governor approves it, would have the result of decreasing the number of teachers
D. if approved by the governor, would result in a reduction of the number of teachers --> Teacher is a countable noun. Hence, reduction in number of teachers in correct.
E. if approved by the governor, would decrease teachers
_________________
Only those who risk going too far, can possibly find out how far one can go
SC Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1746
Re: The controversial restructuring plan for the county school district  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2018, 05:38

Official Explanation

First, we’ll look at what follows the comma, the main verb for the sentence:

(A) “would make there be fewer teachers”—while this uses “fewer” correctly, this is way too casual and informal; this has no place in the formal writing of the GMAT. This choice is incorrect.

(B) “would result in the amount of teachers going down”—teachers are countable, so we need to use “number of teachers,” not “amount of teachers.” This choice is incorrect.

(C) “would have the result of decreasing the number of teachers”—grammatically correct, but very long

(D) “would result in a reduction of the number of teachers”—grammatically correct and more elegant

(E) “would decrease teachers”— very terse, but unclear in meaning; it seems to imply that the plan will make less of teachers as human beings, somehow “decreasing” their essential humanity! This is a sloppy and imprecise way to say what the sentence is trying to say. This choice is incorrect.

We are left with (C) & (D). Both are grammatically correct. Choice (C) is long, rambling, indirect, and excessively wordy: it combines a number of very poor rhetorical choices.

Choice (D) is clear, direct, and elegant. We don’t need a verb between “if” and “approved” because an “it is” is implied.

Choice (D) is mistake free and is the best answer here.
_________________
Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2 | How to Improve GMAT Quant from Q49 to a Perfect Q51 | Time management

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases | Subjunctive Mood
Re: The controversial restructuring plan for the county school district   [#permalink] 19 Sep 2018, 05:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by