GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

It is currently 06 Apr 2020, 08:06

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1166
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 22 Aug 2017, 15:57
11
79
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

58% (01:06) correct 42% (01:15) wrong based on 1972 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has increased unchecked in recent years as a result of the removal of the native fox population and the clearing of surrounding woodlands.

(A) years as a result of the removal of
(B) years as a result of removing
(C) years, resulting from the removing of
(D) years, which is result of removing
(E) years, which is a result of the removal of

_________________

Originally posted by sondenso on 17 May 2008, 02:06.
Last edited by hazelnut on 22 Aug 2017, 15:57, edited 2 times in total.
Added OA.
Most Helpful Community Reply
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 975
Re: The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 May 2008, 08:22
9
4
sondenso wrote:
68. The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has increased unchecked in recent years as a result of the removal of the native fox population and the clearing of surrounding woodlands.

A. years as a result of the removal of
B. years as a result of removing
C. years, resulting from the removing of
D. years, which is result of removing
E. years, which is a result of the removal of


Yea, this is A for me too.
Sondenso, you really got to be careful about this type of parallelism.

While "clearing" can be a verb or a noun, "removing" can only be a verb.
"the clearing" indicates that "clearing" is acting as a noun. You need the noun form - removal - to make the sentence parallel.

GMAT likes to hallucinate you in parallelism...try this problem from the OG:

The decision by one of the nation's largest banks to admit to 3 billion dollars in potential losses on foreign loans could mean less lending by commercial banks to developing countries and increasing the pressure on multi government lenders to supply the funds.
A. increasing the pressure
B. the increasing pressure
C. increased pressure
D. the pressure increased
E. the pressure increasing
General Discussion
Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 594
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2017, 05:56
6
1
As a result of A and B, where A and B should be parallel.


A: The removal of (noun phrase; the removal is a noun phrase)
B: The clearing of (noun phrase; the clearing is a noun phrase)

A noun phrase is parallel with another noun phrase. However if only 'clearing' was mentioned (without the article 'The') then 'clearing of' would have been a participial phrase. Participial phrases are NOT parallel with noun phrases.

B. years as a result of removing - removing is a participial phrase.

D. years, which is result of removing
In correct use of which. Which refers to years here and removing again is a participial phrase.

E. years, which is a result of the removal of
Again incorrect use of which.

Between A and C, the use of 'as a result' sounds better than 'resulting'
'resulting from the removing of the' sounds awkward.

You can eliminate option C because the ING verb after the comma must make sense with the subject of the preceding clause.
"The cottontail rabbit population" "resulting from the removing" does not make sense. So C is out.

Since A does a better job with parallelism and is less awkward A seems fine.

A conjunction such as and must serve to connect PARALLEL FORMS.

A gerund is a VERBing that serves as a NOUN.

Like other types of nouns, a gerund can be modified by a prepositional phrase.
Like other verb forms, a gerund can take a direct object.
VERBing + PREPOSITIONAL PHRASE and VERBing + DIRECT OBJECT are not parallel forms.

B: removing the native fox population and the clearing of surrounding woodlands
Here, the phrases in bold are not parallel forms.
removing the native fox population = VERBing + DIRECT OBJECT.
the clearing of surrounding woods = VERBing + PREPOSITIONAL PHRASE.
These constructions are not parallel.
Eliminate B.

A: the removal of the native fox population and the clearing of surrounding woods
Here, the phrases in bold are parallel forms.

Each is a prepositional phrase serving to modify the preceding noun.

the removal of the native fox population = NOUN + PREPOSITIONAL MODIFIER.
the clearing of surrounding woodlands = NOUN + PREPOSITIONAL MODIFIER.
These constructions are parallel.

A is better simply because is parallel to the next part:
"years as a result of the removal of" and "clearing of".


Correct answer is option A.
_________________
Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch
Current Student
User avatar
B
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 452
Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Schools: WHU MBA"20 (A$)
GMAT 1: 580 Q46 V24
GPA: 3.88
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jan 2016, 13:45
4
The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has increased unchecked in recent years as a result of the removal of the native fox population and the clearing of surrounding woodlands.

A. years as a result of the removal of --> Correct. Action noun is parallel to the complex gerund.
B. years as a result of removing --> Simple gerund phrases are NEVER PARALLEL to complex gerund phrases (see MGMAT SC Guide)
C. years, resulting from the removing of --> Subject cottontail rabbit doesn't make sense with ING-Modifier (resulting) - the rabbit doesn't result from anything, rather the "increase" would be the right subject for the preceding clause.
D. years, which is result of removing --> Which cannot modify a clause
E. years, which is a result of the removal of --> Which cannot modify a clause
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 57
Re: The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2008, 21:34
3
Analysis for option C:

years, resulting from the removing of-----ok---look at this---resulting from the removing of----just speak this two three times in your mind and you will find it is highly awkward....i mean "from the removing of"

Dude as i said before this question is more of understanding of language than any grammar rule....you have to develop the knack of understanding such things which can be developed by reading lot of english stuff may be online like mckinsey reports NY times....i hope it helps...please do revert in case you need more light on this one...i would be more than glad to assist....

Good Luck!
cheers!
bepositive
Retired Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 413
GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jan 2015, 08:43
3
1
shelrod007 wrote:
Kindly help me since i am still confused with C .

C does not sound right i know but i need a definite reason to eliminate C as an answer.

"The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has increased unchecked in recent"..


Usage of verb-ing modifier after the clause ...
a) Describe the clause
Sentence talks about the cotton rabbit population to be increased and how this was done was due to removal of the fox population ..


b) Presents the result of the clause
Here it does not present any result of the clause ...


A] The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has increased unchecked in recent years {Result} as a result of the removal of the native fox population and the clearing of surrounding woodlands (Cause}


C] The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has increased unchecked in recent years {Cause} , resulting from the removing of the native fox population and the clearing of surrounding woodlands {Result}

C is logically incorrect since it reverses the intended cause-effect relationship
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 141
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2013, 09:19
2
A because of parallelism b/w removal and the clearing here the clearing is a complex gerund and removal an action noun.

-- In general only a action noun or a complex gerund can be parallel to an action noun.
_________________
--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 2427
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Re: The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2008, 09:48
1
nothing wrong with A..


with the removal of... with the clearing.. is || and clear
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1000
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2013, 03:07
1
6
fozzzy wrote:
D and E are str8 out... Can someone explain A,B and C

I picked A but want to know why the other options are incorrect. Thanks!


The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has increased unchecked in recent years as a result of the removal of the native fox population and the clearing of surrounding woodlands.

A. years as a result of the removal of
B. years as a result of removing
C. years, resulting from the removing of

First I would talk about C. You can eliminate it because the ING verb after the comma must make sense with the subject of the preceding clause.
"The cottontail rabbit population" "resulting from the removing" does not make sense. So C is out.

Between A and B, A is better simply because is parallel to the next part:
"years as a result of the removal of" and "clearing of".
Current Student
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4428
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Dec 2014, 06:59
1
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2450
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Nov 2017, 22:39
1
The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has increased unchecked in recent years as a result of the removal of the native fox population and the clearing of surrounding woodlands.

(A) years as a result of the removal of - Correct
(B) years as a result of removing - parallelism - the "the" in front of clearing indicates that it's a noun form. (there's no such word as clearage, or clearation, or whatever, so this is the best noun form you're going to get here.)
to be parallel to the clearing, you need another dedicated noun form. here, that's the removal.
(C) years, resulting from the removing of - Subject cottontail rabbit doesn't make sense with ING-Modifier (resulting) - the rabbit doesn't result from anything, rather the "increase" would be the right subject for the preceding clause.
(D) years, which is result of removing - incorrect usage of which
(E) years, which is a result of the removal of - incorrect usage of which

Answer A
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
D
Status: GMAT and GRE tutors
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 3252
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Re: The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2019, 14:06
1
Ajiteshmathur wrote:
Hi GMATNinja,
Can you help me understand this one. The parallelism isn't clear to me here.

Quote:
(A) The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has increased unchecked in recent years as a result of the removal of the native fox population and the clearing of surrounding woodlands.

Let's strip out some of the modifiers in choice (A):

    "The cottontail rabbit population has increased unchecked as a result of (1) the removal of the native fox population and (2) the clearing of the surrounding woodlands."

Taking it one step further, we basically have: "The population has increased as a result of (1) the removal.. and (2) the clearing..." And that makes perfect sense: both "the removal" and "the clearing" are nouns, and they're the two reasons why the population has increased. Since both nouns perform the same function, we have perfectly solid parallelism here.

I hope that helps!
_________________
GMAT/GRE tutors @ www.gmatninja.com (we're hiring!) | GMAT Club Verbal Expert | Instagram | Blog | Bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal: RC | CR | SC

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars: all videos by topic

SC articles & resources: How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

RC, CR, and other articles & resources: All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations: All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button; be specific about your question, and tag @GMATNinja. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
D
Status: GMAT and GRE tutors
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 3252
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Re: The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Oct 2019, 09:05
1
1
Ajiteshmathur wrote:
Hi GMATNinja,
Can you help me understand this one. The parallelism isn't clear to me here.

I'm assuming you're asking about the parallelism in the OA. The important thing to remember is that parallelism isn't about two parts of a sentence appearing identical, but rather about two elements playing the same grammatical role. If I describe someone as "tired and hungry," it's true that I don't have "VERB-ed and VERB-ed," but I don't need to, as "tired" and "hungry" are both adjectives, and so have the same function in the sentence. If they have the same function, they're considered parallel.

Now take another look at the OA: "The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has increased unchecked in recent years as a result of the removal of the native fox population and the clearing of surrounding woodlands."

In this case we have two noun phrases that are causes of the increased rabbit population: 1) the removal of the native fox population and 2) the clearing of surrounding woodlands. It's fine that "the removal" and "the clearing" don't appear identical, because they're both nouns and are playing the same grammatical role.

I hope that helps!
_________________
GMAT/GRE tutors @ www.gmatninja.com (we're hiring!) | GMAT Club Verbal Expert | Instagram | Blog | Bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal: RC | CR | SC

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars: all videos by topic

SC articles & resources: How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

RC, CR, and other articles & resources: All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations: All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button; be specific about your question, and tag @GMATNinja. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 675
Re: The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2013, 01:26
D and E are str8 out... Can someone explain A,B and C

I picked A but want to know why the other options are incorrect. Thanks!
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 685
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2014, 07:00
1
The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has increased unchecked in recent years as a result of the removal of the native fox population and the clearing of surrounding woodlands.

A. years as a result of the removal of -- parallel with the clearing. (correct)

B. years as a result of removing -- removing (gerund noun) -||- the clearing

C. years, resulting from the removing of -- if it had been resulting into then I would have at least given a thought to check its validity
Its is violating the rules of usage of ing modifier (event cause ---> resulting into something) in C causality is reversed. we cant use it to define reverse flow.

D. years, which is result of removing -- which modifying years
E. years, which is a result of the removal of -- same as D.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 126
Concentration: Technology, Other
Schools: Berkeley Haas
GMAT Date: 01-14-2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jan 2015, 07:35
Kindly help me since i am still confused with C .

C does not sound right i know but i need a definite reason to eliminate C as an answer.

"The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has increased unchecked in recent"..


Usage of verb-ing modifier after the clause ...
a) Describe the clause
Sentence talks about the cotton rabbit population to be increased and how this was done was due to removal of the fox population ..


b) Presents the result of the clause
Here it does not present any result of the clause ...
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1189
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2017, 09:07
The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has increased unchecked in recent years as a result of the removal of the native fox population and the clearing of surrounding woodlands.

A. years as a result of the removal of
B. years as a result of removing
C. years, resulting from the removing of
D. years, which is result of removing
E. years, which is a result of the removal of

We need a comparison between nouns. Hence Choice A is correct.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 04 May 2017
Posts: 16
Re: The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Mar 2019, 20:36
egmat
In option C we have resulting after comma . Ing modifier after comma tells or explains how aspect too. I understand that in choice C from the removing of is not very clear and concise. however, if choice c is written like this "years,resulting from the removal of" , would this be correct ?
Director
Director
avatar
P
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 987
Re: The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jul 2019, 20:27
doing can be
a pure noun, such as 'clearing
a gerund, which has some feature of noun and verb
a participle, which has some features of adjective and verb.
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1688
The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jul 2019, 22:58
vishuvashishth That version still wouldn't work, because there's no reasonable noun for "resulting" to refer to. The tricky thing with comma + -ing modifiers is that they typically modify the preceding action or clause (they are adverbial modifiers), but we need a fitting noun to be performing that action. If I am showing the result OF the action, that's easier:

The Fed raised the prime rate, resulting in a decrease in spending.

In that case, "resulting" describes a result of the entire previous clause. The Fed didn't result in something; the action it took did. However, if we want to say "resulting from X," this needs to refer to a specific noun that resulted from X. It would be hard to achieve that in the present sentence. We could say "The increase in the rabbit population, resulting from the removal of X and the clearing of Y . . . " but we'd still need a main verb for the sentence. So far, the subject is "increase" and the rest is all modifiers. We'd need more content to make this a workable sentence, and that would be quite different from the answers on offer above.
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan Prep GMAT Instructor | San Diego


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews
GMAT Club Bot
The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc   [#permalink] 31 Jul 2019, 22:58

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 26 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

The cottontail rabbit population in Orange County, California, has inc

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne