It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 15:14

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 19 Dec 2010
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 27 [5], given: 3

The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2011, 07:22
5
KUDOS
18
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (01:10) correct 43% (01:18) wrong based on 1169 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient in both grain and meat. However, with growing prosperity in Baurisia has come a steadily increasing per capita consumption of meat, an it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. Therefore, since per capita income in Baurisia is almost certain to rise further but increases in domestic grain production are highly unlikely, Baurisia is soon to become an importer of grain.

Which of the following, if true, most seriousle weakend the argument?

A) When people increase their consumption of meat, they also tend to increase their consumption of grain.
B) The per capita consumption of meat in Baurisia is roughly the same accross all income levels.
C) Percapita consumption of meat has not increased substantially in recent years in those countries from which Baurisia is likely to import meat.
D) It is more economical for Baurisians to import meat than grain.
E) During Baurisia's years of growing prosperity, the country's population has remained relatively stable.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 27 [5], given: 3

Intern
Joined: 19 Dec 2010
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 3

Re: Self sufficiency in food [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2011, 07:27
I think I can understand that the reason behind the answer being D is based on this part of stimulus: "and it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat." But this statement seems to give only the comparative measure of meat and grain, not necessarily imply that several pounds of grain can be substituted by meat. Can someone please explain?

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 3

Forum Moderator
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1391

Kudos [?]: 949 [14], given: 621

GPA: 3.77
Re: Self sufficiency in food [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2011, 23:02
14
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hi

Welcome to the Club!

Look you have to dismantle this argument to premises and conclusion:

Premises:
- before meat and grain were enough
- per capita income will rise.
- as a result growing prosperity in Baurisia per capita consumption of meat will increase
- and by the way: (it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat)

Conclusion:
- they will import grain.

Now you must think about it in this way:
if import grain -> feed animals-> kill them->make meat-> meat to Baurisians
if import meat -> meat to Baurisians

In second chain you eliminate the the unnecessary chain "feed animals-> kill them->make meat->" wich is less economical way of producing meat.

Now, just take off the detail in blue, you will see that grain is irrrelevant here. The argument will look like "they had enough meat, but soon because their income increases they will need more meat" So why to buy grain if they need meat indeed?

_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 949 [14], given: 621

Intern
Joined: 19 Dec 2010
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 3

Re: Self sufficiency in food [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2011, 09:13
Aha I see now. So grain was a distraction. However, in that case the problem becomes too simple to be a question.

I though of the chain "if import grain -> feed animals-> kill them->make meat-> meat to Baurisians" that you presented, but I know that animals eat grass not grain. Therefore I dismissed that reasoning. But in the end the whole grain story is artificially thrust upon the basic argument about meat self sufficiency. Thanks for clarification, appreciate it.

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 3

Forum Moderator
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1391

Kudos [?]: 949 [1], given: 621

GPA: 3.77
Re: Self sufficiency in food [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2011, 09:27
1
KUDOS
HygeinicGangster wrote:
Aha I see now. So grain was a distraction. However, in that case the problem becomes too simple to be a question.

I though of the chain "if import grain -> feed animals-> kill them->make meat-> meat to Baurisians" that you presented, but I know that animals eat grass not grain. Therefore I dismissed that reasoning. But in the end the whole grain story is artificially thrust upon the basic argument about meat self sufficiency. Thanks for clarification, appreciate it.

You are welcome: )

I would say that grain or grass is less relevant here.
_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 949 [1], given: 621

Intern
Joined: 17 Oct 2012
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2012, 12:04
What is wrong with Answer Choice C?
I think the answer weakens the question in the way that it leaves out the possibility that the country can import meat directly from other countries.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10119

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Re: The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2014, 22:14
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2014
Posts: 94

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 11

Concentration: Finance, Statistics
GMAT Date: 03-04-2014
GPA: 3.77
WE: Analyst (Retail Banking)
Re: The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2014, 22:43
I initially fell for (B) but then I realized it was already mentioned in the question, so (D) was then the only viable answer.

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 11

Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2013
Posts: 33

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 10

Location: United States
Surendra: Cherukuri
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 3: 720 Q50 V36
GPA: 4
WE: Research (Telecommunications)
Re: The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2014, 23:08
Abdul29 wrote:
I initially fell for (B) but then I realized it was already mentioned in the question, so (D) was then the only viable answer.

Hi,

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 10

Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2014
Posts: 94

Kudos [?]: 73 [5], given: 11

Concentration: Finance, Statistics
GMAT Date: 03-04-2014
GPA: 3.77
WE: Analyst (Retail Banking)
Re: The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2014, 23:18
5
KUDOS
cherukuri1011 wrote:
Abdul29 wrote:
I initially fell for (B) but then I realized it was already mentioned in the question, so (D) was then the only viable answer.

Hi,

(B) "The per capita consumption of meat in Baurisia is roughly the same accross all income levels."

As you can see, this answer choice just gives you a break-down of the consumption accross income levels; which serves as a classic shell-answer. In the question itself, it is clearly stated that "with growing prosperity in Baurisia has come a steadily increasing per capita consumption of meat", so even if the consumption is the same accross all levels, in total, it is increasing.

Thus, B does not directly attack the conclusion of the arguement, which is the act of importing grain.

Kudos [?]: 73 [5], given: 11

Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2013
Posts: 88

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 30

Re: The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2014, 16:48
What is the conclusion ? Is option D weakening the conclusion or destroying it ? By the way objective is to weaken

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 30

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2011
Posts: 358

Kudos [?]: 404 [2], given: 45

Location: United States
WE: Corporate Finance (Manufacturing)
Re: The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2014, 17:37
2
KUDOS
Conclusion:Baurisia is soon to become an importer of grain.

Reasoning: The correct answer weakens the conclusion that Baurisia will be an importer of grain. The incorrect answer supports or is neutral to the conclusion that Baurisia will be an importer of grain.

A) When people increase their consumption of meat, they also tend to increase their consumption of grain. Wrong - if meat and grain is consumed more, then grain imports are likely. Thus, the conclusion is supported.

B) The per capita consumption of meat in Baurisia is roughly the same accross all income levels. Wrong - Neutral. Even if consumption of meat is the same, the statement neither strengthens nor weakens the conclusion.

C) Percapita consumption of meat has not increased substantially in recent years in those countries from which Baurisia is likely to import meat. Wrong - Out of scope. The conclusion depends upon whether or not Baurisia is importing grain.

D) It is more economical for Baurisians to import meat than grain. Correct - If it is more economical to import meat than grain, then Baurisia is more likely to import meat than to import grain. Thus, the conclusion is weakened.

E) During Baurisia's years of growing prosperity, the country's population has remained relatively stable. Wrong - Neutral. Even if the country's population has remained relatively stable, the country is not more or less likely to import grain.

IMO D

Kudos [?]: 404 [2], given: 45

Manager
Joined: 30 May 2013
Posts: 185

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 72

Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.82
Re: The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2014, 10:15
In Conclusion is: Will become the importer of grain.

But in premise its said that : several pounds of grain need to make one pound of meat.
To attack the conclusion the correct answer would say that importing grain will become more increase in cost.

So D) says Importing meat is more economical.

Regards,
Rrsnathan

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 72

Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 269

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 2405

GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 3: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT 4: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 5: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 6: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT 7: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 8: 730 Q50 V39
Re: The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2014, 17:26
LOL! This is very similar to "http://gmatclub.com/forum/gortland-has-long-been-narrowly-self-sufficient-in-both-15827.html?fl=similar".

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 2405

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10119

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Re: The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2015, 04:37
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 May 2010
Posts: 185

Kudos [?]: 33 [1], given: 65

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Re: The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2015, 02:51
1
KUDOS
The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient in both grain and meat.---------This line denotes a fact or premise. However, with growing prosperity in Baurisia has come a steadily increasing per capita consumption of meat, an it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. ---/** This denotes the basis of the argument/** Therefore, since per capita income in Baurisia is almost certain to rise further but increases in domestic grain production are highly unlikely,-----/**This denotes the fact/** Baurisia is soon to become an importer of grain.- This is the conclusion of the argument.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weaken the argument?

A) When people increase their consumption of meat, they also tend to increase their consumption of grain.
B) The per capita consumption of meat in Baurisia is roughly the same accross all income levels.
C) Percapita consumption of meat has not increased substantially in recent years in those countries from which Baurisia is likely to import meat.
D) It is more economical for Baurisians to import meat than grain.
E) During Baurisia's years of growing prosperity, the country's population has remained relatively stable.

The concept says that you can't deny the premise/fact/evidence, but you can deny the reasoning. the reasoning here is more grain will be required to produce meat. One more fact in the argument is increases in domestic grain production is unlikely.

Let's say that in place of option D, it would have been that a viral crop disease has crippled the main country where the Baurisia is likely to import the grain from.
.
Which one would be correct then?

Any expert. help me to get deep into this.

Kudos [?]: 33 [1], given: 65

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10119

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Re: The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2016, 14:37
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 19 Sep 2016
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2017, 10:32
I didn't think it was D because I assumed that maybe they won't import meat as it doesn't or won't have the same quality as the locally grown meat.
Did I make another unnecessary assumption? I was very confused between B and D..

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2015
Posts: 164

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 101

Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V26
Re: The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Feb 2017, 06:55
I'm little bit confused about option C.to weaken the argument we need to find two alternate way.One way is to import meat or another way is to produce more grain.Now both C and D are talking about importing meat but C is a little bit masked and D is direct.So why C is not the right choice??

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 101

Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3157

Kudos [?]: 3304 [0], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Feb 2017, 07:37
techiesam wrote:
I'm little bit confused about option C.to weaken the argument we need to find two alternate way.One way is to import meat or another way is to produce more grain.Now both C and D are talking about importing meat but C is a little bit masked and D is direct.So why C is not the right choice??

The argument indicates that the requirement of meat in Baurisia is going to increase (premise 1), and therefore the requirement of grain is also going to increase (conclusion), because one pound of meat production requires several pounds of grain (premise 2). However the argument assumes that the only source of meat in Baurisia is grains; the argument overlooks the possibility that meat can be supplied by some other means, such as, by importing. Therefore a comparison between grain import and meat import would be a good choice for answering this question. Option D makes this comparison and thereby attacks the link between the premise 2 and conclusion.

Option C does not make it clear whether the price of meat would be low enough in those likely exporting countries so as to make meat import more economical than grain import. No Information is given about grains in this option. Moreover an additional assumption is required that higher consumption results in higher price. Option D is a more direct way and leaves no uncretainty about the advantage of meat import over grain import. Therefore option D is better than option C.

Kudos [?]: 3304 [0], given: 22

The country of Baurisia has, until now, been self-sufficient   [#permalink] 15 Feb 2017, 07:37

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by