It is currently 15 Dec 2017, 19:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The current proposal to give college students a broader

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1375

Kudos [?]: 1721 [0], given: 62

Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2012, 01:14
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

58% (01:33) correct 42% (01:50) wrong based on 48 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The current proposal to give college students a broader choice in planning their own courses of study should be abandoned. The students who are supporting the proposal will never be satisfied, no matter what requirements are established. Some of these students have reached their third year without declaring a major. One first-year student has failed to complete four required courses. Several others have indicated a serious indifference to grades and intellectual achievement.
A flaw in the argument is that it does which one of the following?
(A) avoids the issue by focusing on supporters of the proposal
(B) argues circularly by assuming the conclusion is true in stating the premises.
(C) fails to define the critical term "satisfied"
(D) distorts the proposal advocated by opponents
(E) users the term "student" equivocally

OA is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

_________________

Last edited by Marcab on 06 Dec 2012, 23:59, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 1721 [0], given: 62

VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1375

Kudos [?]: 1721 [0], given: 62

Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2012, 01:49
first let us have some discussion first?
Why do you think that the answer is C?
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1721 [0], given: 62

Manager
Status: Never ever give up on yourself.Period.
Joined: 23 Aug 2012
Posts: 151

Kudos [?]: 401 [0], given: 35

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
GMAT 1: 570 Q47 V21
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V33
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2012, 03:41
Author asserts that students will not be satisfied if new requirements are implied , in order to prove his point he cites that students have poor performance and hence are dissatisfied..but this doesn't mean students will remain dissatisfied after the implementing new changes.

this is what i think.... what's the OA?

Posted from my mobile device

Kudos [?]: 401 [0], given: 35

VP
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1074

Kudos [?]: 672 [0], given: 70

Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2012, 04:27
HI daviesj
i think the answer is A and not C

Kudos [?]: 672 [0], given: 70

Intern
Status: Fighting Gravity..
Joined: 25 May 2012
Posts: 29

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 6

Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V41
GPA: 3.25
WE: Programming (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2012, 20:10
1
KUDOS
The conclusion is to abandon the current proposal. And the premises given are history of supporters of the proposal . So clearly the flaw is that the argument is not focusing on the cause behind the students' performance.

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 6

Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Posts: 169

Kudos [?]: 271 [0], given: 31

Location: India
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V28
GPA: 3.3

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2012, 23:45
IMO A.

The argument does not talk about the proposal but rather about the supporters of proposal. The reasoning why it should be abandoned is not discussed at all.

Kudos [?]: 271 [0], given: 31

Intern
Joined: 18 Jan 2013
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 246

GPA: 3.71

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2013, 12:53
abcgroove wrote:
The conclusion is to abandon the current proposal. And the premises given are history of supporters of the proposal . So clearly the flaw is that the argument is not focusing on the cause behind the students' performance.

Nice explanation, i agree with you. Kudos for you

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 246

Intern
Joined: 02 May 2013
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2013, 19:41
Marcab wrote:
The current proposal to give college students a broader choice in planning their own courses of study should be abandoned. The students who are supporting the proposal will never be satisfied, no matter what requirements are established. Some of these students have reached their third year without declaring a major. One first-year student has failed to complete four required courses. Several others have indicated a serious indifference to grades and intellectual achievement.
A flaw in the argument is that it does which one of the following?
(A) avoids the issue by focusing on supporters of the proposal
(B) argues circularly by assuming the conclusion is true in stating the premises.
(C) fails to define the critical term "satisfied"
(D) distorts the proposal advocated by opponents
(E) users the term "student" equivocally

OA is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

The conclusion is the current proposal should be abandoned. The premises describe negative academic performances of supporters of the proposal in order to strengthen the abandonment. However, the premises do not mention to whether those performances of non-supporters are more positive or not. This is the partial flaw in the argument.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 12

Senior Manager
Status: Student
Joined: 26 Aug 2013
Posts: 250

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 401

Location: France
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: EMLYON FT'16
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
GPA: 3.44

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2013, 04:05
Marcab wrote:
The current proposal to give college students a broader choice in planning their own courses of study should be abandoned. The students who are supporting the proposal will never be satisfied, no matter what requirements are established. Some of these students have reached their third year without declaring a major. One first-year student has failed to complete four required courses. Several others have indicated a serious indifference to grades and intellectual achievement.
A flaw in the argument is that it does which one of the following?
(A) avoids the issue by focusing on supporters of the proposal
(B) argues circularly by assuming the conclusion is true in stating the premises.
(C) fails to define the critical term "satisfied"
(D) distorts the proposal advocated by opponents
(E) users the term "student" equivocally

OA is
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

The argument is about a proposal. The answer is about the people who propose not the argument itself.

Therefore A is the best answer.
_________________

Think outside the box

Last edited by Paris75 on 31 Dec 2013, 08:51, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 401

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 May 2013
Posts: 353

Kudos [?]: 154 [0], given: 70

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: XLRI GM"18
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2013, 13:37
The current proposal to give college students a broader choice in planning their own courses of study should be abandoned. The students who are supporting the proposal will never be satisfied, no matter what requirements are established. Some of these students have reached their third year without declaring a major. One first-year student has failed to complete four required courses. Several others have indicated a serious indifference to grades and intellectual achievement.
A flaw in the argument is that it does which one of the following?
(A) avoids the issue by focusing on supporters of the proposal..... correct..... by focusing on supporters the conclusion is being derived.....
(B) argues circularly by assuming the conclusion is true in stating the premises.... incorrect
(C) fails to define the critical term "satisfied" .... the defining of the term not required here...
(D) distorts the proposal advocated by opponents ... incorrect
(E) users the term "student" equivocally.... irrelevant

Kudos [?]: 154 [0], given: 70

Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2013
Posts: 92

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 31

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2014, 05:44
Yes !! Indeed, the answer is option A. However, the explanations mentioned above by many of us are slightly untouched bythe actual logic. ☺

Broadly, the author has given conclusion and the judgements (assumed as facts/premisses), which are not seemingly supporting the conclusion. Arguments are more author specific not issue specific; it is known as Argumentum ad hominem -the evasion of the actual topic by directing the attack at the doer.

Thanks
Sid

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 31

Re: The current proposal to give college students a broader   [#permalink] 31 Jan 2014, 05:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by