It is currently 24 Jun 2017, 15:59

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The distinctive yellow-green colors of Vincent van Gogh's

Author Message
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4288
The distinctive yellow-green colors of Vincent van Gogh's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2004, 14:53
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The distinctive yellow-green colors of Vincent van Gogh's paintings may have resulted from now known side effects of the drug digitalis. Digitalis was a commonly prescribed drug during the time van Gogh lived, and in portraits of the physician who treated van Gogh, he is holding a branch of foxglove, the plant from which digitalis is made.

The point of the passage is made primarily by
A) presenting clear evidence of cause and effect
B) presenting circumstantial evidence
C) connecting digitalis to van Gogh's paintings
D) citing specific documentary evidence
E) referring to opinions of established authorities
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Director
Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 721
Location: Milwaukee

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2004, 14:59
C
I will explain if it is correct
_________________

Praveen

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1790
Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2004, 15:12
What kind of CR is this.
Who is holding the plant. The physician ?
Unless the drug some how got into the paiting because Von Gogh was using it and the paint brush also had some contact with the drug there is no possibility that painting would change color.

(C) makes some connection but unbelievable connection.
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 350
Location: Manhattan

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2004, 15:46
C
B&D - the two other choices are looked at, seem to be identical to me
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Location: Russian Federation
GMAT 3: 740 Q40 V50
GMAT 4: 700 Q48 V38
GMAT 5: 710 Q45 V41
GMAT 6: 680 Q47 V36
GMAT 9: 740 Q49 V42
GMAT 11: 500 Q47 V33
GMAT 14: 760 Q49 V44
WE: Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2004, 19:19
The point of the passage is - The yellow-green color in VG's painting may be due to Drug Digitalis.
How is the author making this point? by providing evidences
A- not A because there is no clear indication of the cause(because VG used Drug Ditialis in his paintings) and the effect (the yellow green color in VG's paintings)
B- circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence. It is the cirumstances that surrond the facts that can be used to prove a point. In our case- Dr's potrait happen to have the plant from which the drug is made. Therefore VG used it in his painting. a good try but is still too far fetched.
so B maybe.
C - yes, its clear that there is connection between Drug and VG's paintings but I am not convinced if that is strong evidence to prove the point.
D- I strongly feel that the author is proving the point by citing some form of documented evidence ( Dr's potrait with the plant from which the drug is made-Dr is VG's physician). Whether we are convinced is another issue but the author is making a point by citing specific documented facts.
E- is out of scope.
so between B and D, I tend to choose D
Director
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 574
Location: San Jose, CA

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2004, 21:12
Anonymous wrote:
The point of the passage is - The yellow-green color in VG's painting may be due to Drug Digitalis.
How is the author making this point? by providing evidences
A- not A because there is no clear indication of the cause(because VG used Drug Ditialis in his paintings) and the effect (the yellow green color in VG's paintings)
B- circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence. It is the cirumstances that surrond the facts that can be used to prove a point. In our case- Dr's potrait happen to have the plant from which the drug is made. Therefore VG used it in his painting. a good try but is still too far fetched.
so B maybe.
C - yes, its clear that there is connection between Drug and VG's paintings but I am not convinced if that is strong evidence to prove the point.
D- I strongly feel that the author is proving the point by citing some form of documented evidence ( Dr's potrait with the plant from which the drug is made-Dr is VG's physician). Whether we are convinced is another issue but the author is making a point by citing specific documented facts.
E- is out of scope.
so between B and D, I tend to choose D

I'll go with C
I agree with ur point on D ... but shouldn't we consider this to be out of scope?
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 281
Location: Ukraine

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2004, 02:12
Anonymous wrote:
The point of the passage is - The yellow-green color in VG's painting may be due to Drug Digitalis.
How is the author making this point? by providing evidences
A- not A because there is no clear indication of the cause(because VG used Drug Ditialis in his paintings) and the effect (the yellow green color in VG's paintings)
B- circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence. It is the cirumstances that surrond the facts that can be used to prove a point. In our case- Dr's potrait happen to have the plant from which the drug is made. Therefore VG used it in his painting. a good try but is still too far fetched.
so B maybe.
C - yes, its clear that there is connection between Drug and VG's paintings but I am not convinced if that is strong evidence to prove the point.
D- I strongly feel that the author is proving the point by citing some form of documented evidence ( Dr's potrait with the plant from which the drug is made-Dr is VG's physician). Whether we are convinced is another issue but the author is making a point by citing specific documented facts.
E- is out of scope.
so between B and D, I tend to choose D

The author ventures that a certain drug may have inspired VGâ€™s paintings. It is clear that s/he does not have any solid evidence that would stand in court; note the choice of words. Yes, digitalis was a commonly prescribed drug but whether VG used it at all or was addicted to it we cannot ascertain. Yes, some doctor treated VG, but whether VG was treated from one disease or other we have no way of knowing. Yes, the good doctor is holding a bunch of flowers from which the drug is made, but to say that this is documentary evidence of some sort or that there is a double-entendre would be making unwarranted inferences. I believe this is exactly what they call circumstantial evidence (B). Just my two cents.

Last edited by ob on 09 Jun 2004, 05:04, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 400
Location: India

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2004, 04:25
My choice (B),
(D) is close but I don't believe that it is correct because passage doesn't connect digitalis to van Gogh's paintings, passage merely states that it is evident that the cause of Van Gogh's specific color effects were generated by digitalis held by physician(I presume) and this was just circumstantial(the tone of passage sounds like it).

What's the OA.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4288

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2004, 07:12
well, B is OA on this one. This is Peterson's LSAT question. There are no official explanations given but I am not too fond of this question either. I'll try to find some better ones next time

PS nice reasoning ob
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 960
Location: Florida

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2004, 20:37
Quote:
The distinctive yellow-green colors of Vincent van Gogh's paintings may have resulted from now known side effects of the drug digitalis. Digitalis was a commonly prescribed drug during the time van Gogh lived, and in portraits of the physician who treated van Gogh, he is holding a branch of foxglove, the plant from which digitalis is made.

This sentence uses modifiers wrongly, got B, anyway.
author tried a nexus between the drug and the effect. From the last sentence it can be inferred that foxglove would have caused the effect and the painting testifies the presence of foxglove during Gogh's time. [/quote]
10 Jun 2004, 20:37
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In a study of the effect of color on productivity, 50 of 100 2 04 Sep 2010, 07:11
People who are red/green color-blind cannot distinguish 2 02 Jul 2009, 03:12
1 In a study of the effect of color on productivity, 50 of 100 11 29 Jan 2009, 03:26
In a study of the effect of color on productivity, 50 of 100 1 02 Aug 2008, 12:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by