It is currently 24 Sep 2017, 01:52

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The doctrine applies in Canada ,where there is a federal law

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3454

Kudos [?]: 904 [0], given: 781

The doctrine applies in Canada ,where there is a federal law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Dec 2003, 11:45
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:25) wrong based on 2 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The doctrine applies in Canada ,where there is a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid and consistent.

a. is a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid and
b.are a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid and
c.are a federal law and a provincial law both of which are each valid and
d. is a federal law and a provincial law both of which are each valid and
e.are a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid or


this one totally got me !

Again subject verb agreement

the following explanation was provided


We should use the plural verb in the following construction:

"There ARE" + singular/plural noun 1 + "and" + singular/plural noun 2


But in the following case the form of the verb "be" will correspond to the

from of the nearest noun:

"There IS/ARE" + singular/plural noun 1 + "or" no matter what noun 2



is this correct?

thanks
praetorian

Kudos [?]: 904 [0], given: 781

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603

Kudos [?]: 299 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Dec 2003, 06:29
I narrow to B and C and choose B because it is shorter.

You question is interesting. Only AND form a plural subject; others (OR, PLUS, AS WELL AS, and so on) do not.

Kudos [?]: 299 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 261

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Location: sydney
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Dec 2003, 06:33
its B. but where u get it from? such qs don't appear in gmat. i guess....
_________________

When u r about to make ends meet, someone moves the ends.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4273

Kudos [?]: 7616 [0], given: 360

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: SC : Doctrine.. [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Dec 2010, 08:35
A noun becomes a compound noun when it combines with another noun using the conjunction ‘and’ and is plural in number per se.

For example: There is a brother and a sister in this class, is wrong because, a sister and a brother put together becomes a compound and plural noun entailing a plural verb. The correct version is ‘There are a sister and a brother in this class.’ Hence You can dump A and D.
B is the correct one; here ‘that’ is the subject of the subordinate clause; ‘that’ stands for both the laws and the word ‘each’ indicates that the laws individually and jointly are valid and consistent.

C is wrong because of using the unidiomatic ‘both of which are each’. Each is an unnecessary intrusion

E is wrong becos of saying that the laws are each valid ‘or’ consistent. Valid ‘or’ consistent distorts the intended meaning of the original passage.
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7616 [0], given: 360

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Preparing for GMAT - March 2011
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 146

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Location: London
Schools: INSEAD, RSM, HEC, St. Gallen, IF, IESE
WE 1: Finance 6 years
Re: SC : Doctrine.. [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Dec 2010, 09:02
it becomes plural verb as two nouns are combined using the conjunction '‘and’' .
_________________

In The World Full Of Duplicates,, I Am The Only Masterpiece..
Girl Power
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beat-the-beast-with-non-native-speaker-108349.html

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Oct 2010
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: SC : Doctrine.. [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Dec 2010, 09:43
[quote="Praetorian"]The doctrine applies in Canada ,where there is a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid and consistent.

a. is a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid and
b.are a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid and
c.are a federal law and a provincial law both of which are each valid and
d. is a federal law and a provincial law both of which are each valid and
e.are a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid or

IMO, B is the answer

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: SC : Doctrine..   [#permalink] 23 Dec 2010, 09:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The doctrine applies in Canada ,where there is a federal law

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.