It is currently 22 Oct 2017, 00:03

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The earth s resources are being depleted much too fast. To

Author Message
VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore
The earth s resources are being depleted much too fast. To [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2006, 20:07
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The earthâ€™s resources are being depleted much too fast. To correct this, the United States must keep its resource consumption at present levels for many years to come.

13.The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Per capita resource consumption in the United States is at an all-time high.
(B) The United States wastes resources.
(C) The United States uses more resources than any other country.
(D) The United States imports most of the resources it uses.
(E) Curbing U.S. resource consumption will significantly retard world resource depletion.

14.Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument above?
(A) New resource deposits are constantly being discovered.
(B) The United States consumes one-third of all resources used in the world.
(C) Other countries need economic development more than the United States does.
(D) Other countries have agreed to hold their resource consumption at present levels.
(E) The United States has been conserving resources for several years.

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1367

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2006, 20:23
E
D

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1161

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2006, 20:40
E
D

too.

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2006, 20:49
same here.. 13 - E, 14 - D

- "the United States must keep its resource consumption..." => "Curbing U.S. resource consumption..."
- "... at present levels for ..." => "Other countries have ... present levels"

the rest OT.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 76

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

Location: New York City

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2006, 20:50
E
B

.......
_________________

'Hakuna matata'

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 326

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2006, 22:09
1-C(E uses significantly and the argument only stands if it is assumed that united states consumes more recources than any other)
2-B(Yes it does according to this statement)
_________________

A well-balanced person is one who has a drink in each of his hands.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2006, 23:18
punnu_mba wrote:
E
B

.......

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1012

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2006, 04:03
kripalkavi wrote:
punnu_mba wrote:
E
B

.......

E because, the argument above is giving a lot of importance to US maintaining its consumption level.

B because US is consuming 1/3 of all the world resources. If US doesnt control consumption, the resources will deplete no matter what other countries do.

"the United States must keep its resource consumption at present levels for many years to come" is a conclusion.

What can strengthen it? any statement that says that US is consuming a lot.

If US is consuming very little, and there is no great benefit by US controlling its consumption.

If we take D, there is a possibility for the assumption that "US is consuming very little"

No?
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2006, 04:35
ak_idc wrote:
kripalkavi wrote:
punnu_mba wrote:
E
B

.......

E because, the argument above is giving a lot of importance to US maintaining its consumption level.

B because US is consuming 1/3 of all the world resources. If US doesnt control consumption, the resources will deplete no matter what other countries do.

"the United States must keep its resource consumption at present levels for many years to come" is a conclusion.

What can strengthen it? any statement that says that US is consuming a lot.

If US is consuming very little, and there is no great benefit by US controlling its consumption.

If we take D, there is a possibility for the assumption that "US is consuming very little"

No?

hmmm....so the important thing here is that 'the consumes a LOT'. so any statement reiterating that would be strengthening the argument.

The reason I picked D (in the second one) was:
1. US will reduce its consumption
2. Other countries will not increase thier consumption.

Thus overall consumption will decrease. What did I miss?

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 702

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2006, 04:41
13 Straight E.

14 HAS TO BE B. US uses one third of available resources. B supports strongly than given other options.

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1012

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2006, 05:41
kripalkavi wrote:
ak_idc wrote:
kripalkavi wrote:
punnu_mba wrote:
E
B

.......

E because, the argument above is giving a lot of importance to US maintaining its consumption level.

B because US is consuming 1/3 of all the world resources. If US doesnt control consumption, the resources will deplete no matter what other countries do.

"the United States must keep its resource consumption at present levels for many years to come" is a conclusion.

What can strengthen it? any statement that says that US is consuming a lot.

If US is consuming very little, and there is no great benefit by US controlling its consumption.

If we take D, there is a possibility for the assumption that "US is consuming very little"

No?

hmmm....so the important thing here is that 'the consumes a LOT'. so any statement reiterating that would be strengthening the argument.

The reason I picked D (in the second one) was:
1. US will reduce its consumption
2. Other countries will not increase thier consumption.

Thus overall consumption will decrease. What did I miss?

Tom should have control over his food habits, because he eats a lot..

Tom should have control over his food habits, because others are planning to do so.

Which of these statements is more logical?
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 76

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

Location: New York City

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2006, 07:07
The first statements looks more logical to me....

Tom should have control over his food habits, because he eats a lot..

Tom should have control over his food habits, because others are planning to do so.
_________________

'Hakuna matata'

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 743

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Location: Dallas, Texas

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2006, 15:04
13 -(C)
14 - (B)
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1012

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2006, 20:19
punnu_mba wrote:
The first statements looks more logical to me....

Tom should have control over his food habits, because he eats a lot..

Tom should have control over his food habits, because others are planning to do so.

so based on punnu's choice, we will go for answer B
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 524

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Location: US

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2006, 06:41
This is clearly C and B

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 71

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2006, 10:49
its clearly E and B

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1012

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2006, 21:40
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
13 -(C)
14 - (B)

How do we know that US consumes more than any other country?

It is possible that China might be consuming most, but the country may not be able to maintain the same consumption, because it is a growing economy. US might be coming close second. But as the economy has reached a matured state it may be possible to maintain the same consumption of resources. So author could be stressing on US and not on China. This logic clearly applies when we take the case amount of pollutants that different countries are allowed to release into atmosphere. Almost, all the developed countries have limits. But not countries like India, and China.

E does not have this complexity. As the author is mentioning US, one can be certain that "Curbing U.S. resource consumption will significantly retard world resource depletion"

No?
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2006, 09:30
ak_idc wrote:
kripalkavi wrote:
ak_idc wrote:
kripalkavi wrote:
punnu_mba wrote:
E
B

.......

E because, the argument above is giving a lot of importance to US maintaining its consumption level.

B because US is consuming 1/3 of all the world resources. If US doesnt control consumption, the resources will deplete no matter what other countries do.

"the United States must keep its resource consumption at present levels for many years to come" is a conclusion.

What can strengthen it? any statement that says that US is consuming a lot.

If US is consuming very little, and there is no great benefit by US controlling its consumption.

If we take D, there is a possibility for the assumption that "US is consuming very little"

No?

hmmm....so the important thing here is that 'the consumes a LOT'. so any statement reiterating that would be strengthening the argument.

The reason I picked D (in the second one) was:
1. US will reduce its consumption
2. Other countries will not increase thier consumption.

Thus overall consumption will decrease. What did I miss?

Tom should have control over his food habits, because he eats a lot..

Tom should have control over his food habits, because others are planning to do so.

Which of these statements is more logical?

You cannot compare these 2 statements with the actual question.
Your question caters specifically to Tom. i.e. Tom controls it for his own good. But if the question was about general food depletion in the state due to Tom's eating habits then the second choice would be more logical.

This is the case with the original question.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 49

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2006, 13:55
13: C

Here the question is for assumptions not for conclusion.

14: E

I am npot sure here.
_________________

Woody crack the GMAT

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 49

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2006, 13:56
_________________

Woody crack the GMAT

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

17 Sep 2006, 13:56

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 26 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by