Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 28 May 2017, 17:08

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Posts: 97
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 97 [3] , given: 0

The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2009, 23:45
3
KUDOS
29
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

61% (02:34) correct 39% (01:57) wrong based on 2143 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is proportional to its body weight, whereas the animal’s energy output available to perform this task is proportional to its surface area. This is the reason that small animals, like squirrel, can run up a tree trunk almost as fast as they can move on level ground, whereas large animals tend to slow down when they are moving uphill.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the explanation above depends?

(A) The amount of energy needed to move uphill is no greater for large animals that it is for small animals.
(B) Small animals can move more rapidly than large animals can.
(C) The ratio of surface area to body weight is smaller in large animals than it is in small animals.
(D) There is little variation in the ratio of energy output to body weight among animals.
(E) The amount of energy needed to run at a given speed is proportional to the surface area of the running animal.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

"The highest result of education is tolerance."

If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 817
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 0

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2009, 00:11
tough question..i think its btwn B and C, leaning towards B
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 254
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 157 [0], given: 1

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2009, 02:20
IMO C

The energy an animal must expend to move uphill is proportional to its body weight, whereas the animal’s energy output available to perform this task is proportional to its surface area. This is the reason that small animals, like squirrel, can run up a tree trunk almost as fast as they can move on level ground, whereas large animals tend to slow down when they are moving uphill.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the explanation above depends?
(A) The amount of energy needed to move uphill is no greater for large animals that it is for small animals --> counterfact
(B) Small animals can move more rapidly than large animals can --> it's not about the speed of large animals to small animals, it's about speed of each in uphill in compared with each' speed in flat ground
(C) The ratio of surface area to body weight is smaller in large animals than it is in small animals -->the best. Because such ratio of large animals is not equal to that of small animals, large animals can;t remain its speed when moving uphill as can small animals when moving uphill
(D) There is little variation in the ratio of energy output to body weight among animals --> no influence
(E) The amount of energy needed to run at a given speed is proportional to the surface area of the running animal -->not qualified enough to be basis of the argument
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 285
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 3

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2009, 03:19
Why B ?

IMO c shud be answer.. as the per logic above..
Manager
Joined: 24 May 2009
Posts: 106
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2009, 03:26
I'll go with C.
Director
Joined: 03 Jun 2009
Posts: 790
Location: New Delhi
WE 1: 5.5 yrs in IT
Followers: 85

Kudos [?]: 818 [0], given: 56

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2009, 03:27
I also vote for C.

B is out, since in the argument its mentioned that :
jainu wrote:
This is the reason that small animals, like squirrel, can run up a tree trunk almost as fast as they can move on level ground, whereas large animals tend to slow down when they are moving uphill.

We don't have any comparison of how these animals perform on level ground. The comparison is only for uphill.
_________________
Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 823
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 106

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2009, 09:43
Straightaway C..

Answer can be prephased before even seeing the choices.

--
(1:10)
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 817
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 0

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2009, 14:03
Neochronic wrote:
Why B ?

IMO c shud be answer.. as the per logic above..

Im just skeptical about C because it could be that the surface/body ratio could be bigger on smaller animals. You could assume either way
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Posts: 97
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 0

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2009, 08:30
Thanks Minheequang . OA is C
_________________

"The highest result of education is tolerance."

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 253
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 1

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2009, 23:05
The answer is ofcourse.....But I o see one more flaw in the argument...While talking about the energy required and available, the direction goes to the speed....Which lead me to E initially..Can someone pls explain why E will not be credible...
_________________

Choose Life

Manager
Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 157
Location: India
Schools: ISB
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 58 [1] , given: 14

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2010, 07:30
1
KUDOS
I will also go with C for same reason....
_________________

_________________
If you like my post, consider giving me a kudos. THANKS!

Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2010
Posts: 105
Location: Denver
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 378 [0], given: 14

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2010, 08:52
it should be C
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 585
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 705 [10] , given: 20

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2010, 11:23
10
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I answered the question using ratio:
let ratio for large animals = S/E
Ratio for small animals = s/e
option C: S/E < s/e.........when inverted looks like this:
E/S > e/s........ that is:
energy expended per unit space (for large animals) > that for small animals...
tallies with the stimulus and is thus the CORRECT answer.
_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

Director
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 943
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 77

Kudos [?]: 1330 [0], given: 40

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2010, 11:35
IMO C.

@gmatbull,

You must have done good DS
_________________

Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2008
Posts: 90
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 7

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2010, 12:27
Guessed C... but really tough one.. mine was a pure lucky guess
Intern
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Posts: 28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2010, 14:04
SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1510
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 630 [0], given: 6

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2010, 14:06
good question and good explanation by gmatbull
Intern
Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 40
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 4

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2010, 15:14
should be c
Manager
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Posts: 70
Location: INDIA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 4

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2010, 20:37
i will go with c
_________________

MBA (Mind , Body and Attitude )

Intern
Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Energy to move uphill [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2010, 20:42
It's C.
Re: Energy to move uphill   [#permalink] 27 Apr 2010, 20:42

Go to page    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 61 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Studies of brain lateralization in animals 1 02 Feb 2017, 05:42
3 The energy an animal must expend 1 25 Jan 2017, 00:16
4 The current move to patent computer programs is a move in 7 13 Jul 2015, 19:36
Ethicist: On average, animals raised on grain must be fed 8 05 Jan 2014, 16:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by