It is currently 23 Jun 2017, 08:47

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2003
Posts: 177
The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2004, 11:29
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal government has placed on industry poses more servious hardships for big bussiness than for small ones. Since large companies do everthing on a more massive scale, they must alter more complex operation s and spend much more money to meet governmental requirements.

which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above ?
A. small companies are less likely than large companies to have the capital reserves for improvements.
C. safety regulation codes are uniform, established without reference to size of company.

Which the option is answer ?

Last edited by chihao on 17 Jan 2004, 20:04, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Joined: 01 Oct 2003
Posts: 20
Location: Not far

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2004, 12:10
I think a word is missing in this sentence. The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal government has hardships for big bussiness than for small ones.
_________________

Aiming for 700.

Director
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 501
Location: 55405

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2004, 12:27
Neither C nor A really weaken the argument, in the sense that I would use the word weaken. Both A and C, if spoken after the argument in the problem, would begin with "yeah, but..."

A doesn't refute the passage's claim, it just provides an argument which has little to do with the one provided, by stating that small businesses don't have the necessary capital to comply with the regulations.

C doesn't refute the claim, either. It merely states that the "playing field is level, because the regulations are identical.

So it's tough, neither answer is perfect, in my very humble opinion, but I'd give the nod to C.

I think this is an extremely difficult choice. Please tell me that this is an LSAT question.
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1790
Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2004, 12:28

Option C in a way strengthens the argument by providing additional support. Since both the buisnesses need to adhere to the regulations more burden will be on Big buisnesses.

Option A on the otherhand says small buisnesses will be affected even more since they dont have capital reserves they wil have to close shops or occur huge debts.
Director
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 501
Location: 55405

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2004, 12:34
anand,

Do you know that A is the answer, or are you giving your opinion?
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1790
Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2004, 13:02
Sorry I meant "IMO A is the answer."

Hi stoolfi,

I am starving for verbal Qs. Right now I have burried my head in Math Qs.
Director
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 501
Location: 55405

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2004, 13:12
Hello, Anand,

I, too, am starving for verbal q's-- to the point where I'm ready to do some GMAT+, whether or not the answers are correct.

I have indeed changed my icon. I like looking at girls more than cars and cartoons, though. I wonder if any of the regulars around here are women. If so, I bet they're a bit put off by all the babe-worship that goes on around here...
Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2003
Posts: 177

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2004, 20:06
Sorry ! I indeed miss some words inside the argument. Now, I have corrected those mistakes.
But I choose C............
The question come from GMAT Plus.
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 770
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2004, 03:41
chihao wrote:
The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal government has placed on industry poses more servious hardships for big bussiness than for small ones. Since large companies do everthing on a more massive scale, they must alter more complex operation s and spend much more money to meet governmental requirements.

which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above ?
A. small companies are less likely than large companies to have the capital reserves for improvements.
C. safety regulation codes are uniform, established without reference to size of company.

Which the option is answer ?

This is a simple question if you look at it the proper way.

First, you must recognize the CONCLUSION of the argument, which is:
"regulations ... poses more servious hardships for big bussiness than for small ones"

A). identifies a severe hardship for smaller business, thus weakening the argument.

C) actually provides some support in the following way: since regulation are created without regard for size, it is possible and perhaps even likely that such regulations can affect different sized businesses in dispropotional ways.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

Intern
Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 10
Re: The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2016, 04:43
I think that answer is A, but i'm not sure.
Math Forum Moderator
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 2888
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Re: The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2016, 13:21
kris77 wrote:
I think that answer is A, but i'm not sure.

kris77 , bro you have bumped on a 12 year old thread.

Please go through the following link, you will find lot of discussion going on on the same question.

the-excessive-number-of-safety-regulations-that-the-federal-128389.html

And you are correct answer is (A)
_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Re: The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal   [#permalink] 15 Apr 2016, 13:21
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 Safety consultant: Judged by the number of injuries per licensed 4 22 Mar 2017, 09:58
5 Calories consumed in excess (CR Bible) 4 19 Mar 2017, 08:43
11 Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety 7 27 Nov 2015, 08:25
38 The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal 19 12 Oct 2016, 14:21
44 Federal regulations require that corporations use separate 33 26 May 2017, 13:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by