It is currently 24 Jun 2017, 00:15

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Intern
Joined: 13 Aug 2007
Posts: 9
The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2007, 17:43
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:01) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal government has placed on industry poses more serious hardships for big businesses than for small ones. Since large companies do everything on a more massive scale, they must alter more complex operations and spend much more money to meet governmental requirements.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
a) small companies are less likely than large companies to have the capital reserves for improvement.
b) the operation of small companies frequently rely on the same technologies as the operations of large companies.
c) safety regulation codes are uniform established without reference to size of company
d) large companies typically have more of their profits invested in other businesses than do small companies.
e) large companies are in general more likely than small companies to diversify their markets and products

OA is.........T.T
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 180

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2007, 20:49
Tough one.

I would go for A.
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 859
Re: CR: Safety regulations [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2007, 01:43
I can see A only competing for the right choice!
I can explain if I am right

YHP wrote:
The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal government has placed on industry poses more serious hardships for big businesses than for small ones. Since large companies do everything on a more massive scale, they must alter more complex operations and spend much more money to meet governmental requirements.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
a) small companies are less likely than large companies to have the capital reserves for improvement.
b) the operation of small companies frequently rely on the same technologies as the operations of large companies.
c) safety regulation codes are uniform established without reference to size of company
d) large companies typically have more of their profits invested in other businesses than do small companies.
e) large companies are in general more likely than small companies to diversify their markets and products

OA is.........T.T
Intern
Joined: 04 Dec 2004
Posts: 34
Location: bangalore

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2007, 01:51
I like A.

A says, since small companies have less capital for improvements mandated by regulations, they are the hardest hit and probably will be taken out of operation.
Large companies have the money to implement the regulations.So, even though large companies face hardships, they are less effected than the small companies are.
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 856

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2007, 03:20
I think its E...not sure though
Intern
Joined: 13 Aug 2007
Posts: 9

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2007, 17:05
OA is A. why??...
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 376

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2007, 13:11
I think it is B. If the small and big cos have the same technologies why shud it cause more hardship for the biggies than the small guys ?
Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 573

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2007, 20:41
dahcrap wrote:
I think it is B. If the small and big cos have the same technologies why shud it cause more hardship for the biggies than the small guys ?

Same here . My bet would be on B . If there is something which establishes similarities between small and large companies , it will weaken the argument .
Director
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 872
Schools: University of Chicago, Wharton School
Re: CR: Safety regulations [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2007, 21:25
YHP wrote:
The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal government has placed on industry poses more serious hardships for big businesses than for small ones. Since large companies do everything on a more massive scale, they must alter more complex operations and spend much more money to meet governmental requirements.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

a) small companies are less likely than large companies to have the capital reserves for improvement.
b) the operation of small companies frequently rely on the same technologies as the operations of large companies.
c) safety regulation codes are uniform established without reference to size of company
d) large companies typically have more of their profits invested in other businesses than do small companies.
e) large companies are in general more likely than small companies to diversify their markets and products

OA is.........T.T

in fact A, B and E all weaken the argument. its not well designed question.

I prefer E though A also help some extent...
Re: CR: Safety regulations   [#permalink] 17 Aug 2007, 21:25
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 The excessive paperwork used to process claims at Brakeland Insurance 4 06 Jun 2017, 03:36
Federal regulations require that corporations use separate 0 26 May 2017, 11:27
Federal regulations require that corporations use separate a 0 03 Jun 2014, 04:10
Federal regulations require that corporations use separate 0 06 May 2015, 10:40
Federal regulations require that corporations use separate 0 06 May 2015, 10:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The excessive number of safety regulations that the federal

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.