It is currently 17 Nov 2017, 12:58

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The executive committee of the shopping mall announced

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2009
Posts: 181

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2009, 01:12

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 5

Manager
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 51

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 3

Location: baltimore, md
Schools: kellogg, booth, stern, ann arbor

### Show Tags

03 Mar 2010, 18:23
Late post. (sigh) seem to be late on everything. anyways you can add one for D.

a Retailers expect this to be one of the busiest shopping seasons yet, drastically increasing the number of people in mall parking lots. This actually strengthens the idea to put more security around the area. NOPE.

b Police reports from the previous year show that most of the robberies occurred in the south parking lot. hmmm. interesting. but i don't think this is the answer. lets look at it this way. prior to teaming with the police, the mall security had 10 individuals. if 2/3 patrolled the north, then 1/3 patrol the south. that means about 7 north and 3 south. now lets assume that we add 10 police to the equation. now we have 20 individuals for patrol. if we do 1/3 in the south, we now have 6 people patrolling. more than the 3 we had last year. this may not be efficient, but it still provides a good enough reason to partner with the police.

c Some officers in the north parking lot will be directing traffic rather than patrolling. The answer, indeed, does say SOME. this still means that there are a number of police on patrol. Again, if you use the logic from B, then it still wouldn't be grounds for any criticism.

d Security cameras have been installed on light posts in all parking lots, in the hopes of identifying armed robbers. ahh here is the answer. if we placed a number of cameras in the parking lot, it could be grounds to say the additional security is pretty much pointless.

e There are a large number of entrances and exits to the parking lots, making isolating suspect cars difficult. this seems more likely to strengthen the argument.
_________________

Paaaaayyy Meeeee!!!!!

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 3

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 287

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Mar 2010, 05:48
We have to look for an option which says that "addition of police officers' will not help.
I think E does it pretty well.

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

CEO
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2757

Kudos [?]: 1907 [0], given: 235

Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2010, 05:58
I will also go with D

_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Gmat test review :
http://gmatclub.com/forum/670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Kudos [?]: 1907 [0], given: 235

Intern
Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Posts: 31

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

The executive committee of the shopping mall announced [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2010, 23:16
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The executive committee of the shopping mall announced yesterday it will partner with city police to add more officers to the mall security force for the holiday shopping season. The mall security team, which consists of 10 officers, was deemed too small to keep shoppers safe after there were 44 armed robberies in the parking lot during last year's season. At least two thirds of the officers will be patrolling the mall's north parking lot, which sees the most traffic from shoppers.

Which of the following, if true, is the best basis for criticizing the plan to deter crime by adding additional security officers?

-Retailers expect this to be one of the busiest shopping seasons yet, drastically increasing the number of people in mall parking lots.
-Police reports from the previous year show that most of the robberies occurred in the south parking lot.
-Some officers in the north parking lot will be directing traffic rather than patrolling.
-Security cameras have been installed on light posts in all parking lots, in the hopes of identifying armed robbers.
-There are a large number of entrances and exits to the parking lots, making isolating suspect cars difficult.

what do u thk is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2009
Posts: 311

Kudos [?]: 99 [1], given: 44

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2010, 00:37
1
KUDOS
I think it's B.

A. Retailers expect this to be one of the busiest shopping seasons yet, drastically increasing the number of people in mall parking lots.- irrelevant
B. Police reports from the previous year show that most of the robberies occurred in the south parking lot. Correct. It weakens the argument "At least two thirds of the officers will be patrolling the mall's north parking lot"
C. Some officers in the north parking lot will be directing traffic rather than patrolling. - irrelevant
D. Security cameras have been installed on light posts in all parking lots, in the hopes of identifying armed robbers. - irrelevant
E. There are a large number of entrances and exits to the parking lots, making isolating suspect cars difficult. - irrelevant
_________________

"Success is going from failure to failure without a loss of enthusiam." - Winston Churchill

As vs Like - Check this link : http://www.grammar-quizzes.com/like-as.html.

Kudos [?]: 99 [1], given: 44

Director
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 926

Kudos [?]: 1543 [1], given: 40

WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2010, 02:20
1
KUDOS
IMO A.

We are asked to find the best critisism that shows that by adding additional security, it will be of no use to deter crime. As the retailers expect more people in the parking lot then adding more police there will be of no use.

-Retailers expect this to be one of the busiest shopping seasons yet, drastically increasing the number of people in mall parking lots. [correct]
-Police reports from the previous year show that most of the robberies occurred in the south parking lot. [we are not asked or told where the robberies occuring]
-Some officers in the north parking lot will be directing traffic rather than patrolling. [close contender but not the best]
-Security cameras have been installed on light posts in all parking lots, in the hopes of identifying armed robbers. [does it help to deter the crime or help tracing the robbers ]
-There are a large number of entrances and exits to the parking lots, making isolating suspect cars difficult. [this is opposite to what is being asked]
_________________

Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Kudos [?]: 1543 [1], given: 40

Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 196

Kudos [?]: 111 [1], given: 12

Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2010, 07:09
1
KUDOS
Question is 'criticizing the plan to deter crime by adding additional security officers':

-Retailers expect this to be one of the busiest shopping seasons yet, drastically increasing the number of people in mall parking lots.
>> If there are more number of people in parking lots, then there is a need for more number of security officers. This can not be a point of critisism.-Police reports from the previous year show that most of the robberies occurred in the south parking lot.
>> This talks about which parking lot had more crime in the previous season, which could be a point to critisize the statement of placing more security officers on north entrance. But is not right for our question of number of security officers.-Some officers in the north parking lot will be directing traffic rather than patrolling.
>> This could be a point to consider. But it specifies 'some' officers. Ruled out.-Security cameras have been installed on light posts in all parking lots, in the hopes of identifying armed robbers.
>> Yes. If the security cameras are installed in parking lots to identify armed robbers, why do more security officers are needed to identify armed robbers?. This criticizes the need for more security officers.
-There are a large number of entrances and exits to the parking lots, making isolating suspect cars difficult.
>> If there are more number of entrances, then more number of security officers might help to deter crime.

_________________

+1Kudos, if this helps

Kudos [?]: 111 [1], given: 12

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 448

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2010, 08:19
+1 D

If more security cameras are being installed, then number of guards needed will be less.

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 10

Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 220

Kudos [?]: 105 [1], given: 38

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2010, 08:26
1
KUDOS
B?

-Retailers expect this to be one of the busiest shopping seasons yet, drastically increasing the number of people in mall parking lots.
If one of the premises says the size of crowd attacts robbers, I'll pick this one. Otherwise it seems to be irrelevent.

-Police reports from the previous year show that most of the robberies occurred in the south parking lot.Mmm this one is a bit loose. But the most relevant and parallel to the plan details.

-Some officers in the north parking lot will be directing traffic rather than patrolling.
Irrelevant?

-Security cameras have been installed on light posts in all parking lots, in the hopes of identifying armed robbers.
This should not have any impact on the plan's effectiveness

-There are a large number of entrances and exits to the parking lots, making isolating suspect cars difficult. This may be the reason why at least two thirds of the officer will be patrolling the busiest parking lot

Kudos [?]: 105 [1], given: 38

Intern
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2010, 08:50
Great explanations!

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 10

Intern
Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Posts: 31

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2010, 15:53
OA is B.

I went with C for this. B and C were my bet.
The question says plan to deter crime by adding additional security officers

So we need to find choices which states adding additional security was not going to help mall security.

B says adding additional security to the south wing when the lot of incidents happened in North wing last year. This is solely based on last yr's input and the passage gives no guarantee that lot of incidents will happen in the same wing this year too.
I chose C because it says the additional security was added to regulate trafic and not necessarily for security. Robberies can still happen even after adding additional security.
If the question can just said plan to deter crime, I would have gone with B .
Any idea why this option should be ruled out.?

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2008
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2010, 17:29
I think it is B..

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 236

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2010, 00:48
am I getting worse at solving CR or what?
I picked C based on the question being "to deter crime .....by adding additional security officers." If some of them are controlling traffic instead, it does not really support the argument about adding more officers.
The biggest drawback of C is "some." It could mean more than 1, leaving more than enough to concentrate on security.
B is definitely a contender, but I thought that since more crime happened in a parking lot when there only 10 officers, adding overall more officers would increase their presence in the vulnerable parking lot as well.

Well, as I write I feel B is a better choice than C. good one.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Director
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 926

Kudos [?]: 1543 [0], given: 40

WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain

### Show Tags

22 May 2010, 02:10
Not convinced with the OA.

Report is on last yr records while this yr the situation can be different.
_________________

Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Kudos [?]: 1543 [0], given: 40

VP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1471

Kudos [?]: 788 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

24 May 2010, 12:04
I would pick (B) as it says that last year's report indicates that al robberies took place on south side whereas the plan is to have the police officers on the south side.

Kudos [?]: 788 [0], given: 6

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 445

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 58

Re: The executive committee of the shopping mall announced [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2014, 02:21
Can someone comment on why C isn't right?
If we are adding officers but they will be directing traffic and not patrolling, how will that help prevent crime?

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 58

Manager
Status: I am not a product of my circumstances. I am a product of my decisions
Joined: 20 Jan 2013
Posts: 131

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 68

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GPA: 3.92
WE: Operations (Energy and Utilities)
Re: The executive committee of the shopping mall announced [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2014, 06:29
ronr34 wrote:
Can someone comment on why C isn't right?
If we are adding officers but they will be directing traffic and not patrolling, how will that help prevent crime?

C is not the answer because it says that "Some of the officers" and not "Most or all of the officers". This implies that even though some of the officers will be directing traffic, most of the officers will be patrolling the parking lots.

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 68

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10143

Kudos [?]: 270 [1], given: 0

Re: The executive committee of the shopping mall announced [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jan 2015, 13:42
1
KUDOS
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [1], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 08 Jan 2015
Posts: 13

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 9

Re: The executive committee of the shopping mall announced [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2015, 04:22
B... Even after deploying additional security officer, it didnt serve the purpose of stopping crimes from happening

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 9

Re: The executive committee of the shopping mall announced   [#permalink] 20 Jan 2015, 04:22

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 42 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by