It is currently 10 Dec 2017, 23:06

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The executive committee of the shopping mall announced

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 1515 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
The executive committee of the shopping mall announced [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2009, 07:07
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

89% (01:16) correct 11% (01:53) wrong based on 76 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The executive committee of the shopping mall announced yesterday it will partner with city police to add more officers to the mall security force for the holiday shopping season. The mall security team, which consists of 10 officers, was deemed too small to keep shoppers safe after there were 44 armed robberies in the parking lot during last year's season. At least two thirds of the officers will be patrolling the mall's north parking lot, which sees the most traffic from shoppers.

Which of the following, if true, is the best basis for criticizing the plan to deter crime by adding additional security officers?

a Retailers expect this to be one of the busiest shopping seasons yet, drastically increasing the number of people in mall parking lots.

b Police reports from the previous year show that most of the robberies occurred in the south parking lot.

c Some officers in the north parking lot will be directing traffic rather than patrolling.

d Security cameras have been installed on light posts in all parking lots, in the hopes of identifying armed robbers.

e There are a large number of entrances and exits to the parking lots, making isolating suspect cars difficult.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1515 [0], given: 2

Intern
Status: Applying
Joined: 30 Jul 2009
Posts: 38

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2009, 07:36
[EDIT - REMOVED BY THE USER]

Last edited by nplaneta on 17 Jun 2012, 19:09, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 3

Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2009
Posts: 150

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2009, 08:26
IMO C.

Question asks for "best basis for criticizing the plan to deter crime by adding additional security officers"

IF the additional officers suppose to be deployed for patrolling would be used for something else, this would be a criticism. They could've hired parking attendent to facilitate the process why securtiy officers??

OA?

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 1

VP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 1515 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2009, 08:29
nplaneta wrote:
noboru wrote:
The executive committee of the shopping mall announced yesterday it will partner with city police to add more officers to the mall security force for the holiday shopping season. The mall security team, which consists of 10 officers, was deemed too small to keep shoppers safe after there were 44 armed robberies in the parking lot during last year's season. At least two thirds of the officers will be patrolling the mall's north parking lot, which sees the most traffic from shoppers.

Which of the following, if true, is the best basis for criticizing the plan to deter crime by adding additional security officers?

a Retailers expect this to be one of the busiest shopping seasons yet, drastically increasing the number of people in mall parking lots.

b Police reports from the previous year show that most of the robberies occurred in the south parking lot.

c Some officers in the north parking lot will be directing traffic rather than patrolling.

d Security cameras have been installed on light posts in all parking lots, in the hopes of identifying armed robbers.

e There are a large number of entrances and exits to the parking lots, making isolating suspect cars difficult.

IMO B

Having 2/3 of your officers in the North lot is FAR less effective in deterring crime if most of the crimes occurred in the South lot.

The remaining 1/3 could be enough to deter the crime...
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1515 [0], given: 2

VP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 1515 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2009, 08:30
whatthehell wrote:
IMO C.

Question asks for "best basis for criticizing the plan to deter crime by adding additional security officers"

IF the additional officers suppose to be deployed for patrolling would be used for something else, this would be a criticism. They could've hired parking attendent to facilitate the process why securtiy officers??

OA?

It says that SOME officers will be directing traffic, not ALL...
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1515 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 132

Kudos [?]: 587 [0], given: 13

Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.8
WE: General Management (Retail)

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2009, 08:32
whatthehell wrote:
IMO C.

Question asks for "best basis for criticizing the plan to deter crime by adding additional security officers"

IF the additional officers suppose to be deployed for patrolling would be used for something else, this would be a criticism. They could've hired parking attendent to facilitate the process why securtiy officers??

OA?

well explained. i would second whatthehell
_________________

i love kudos consider giving them if you like my post!!

http://gmatclub.com/forum/critical-reasoning-for-beginners-82111.html
QUANT NOTES FOR PS & DS: notes to help you do better in Quant. Click Below
http://gmatclub.com/forum/quant-notes-for-ps-ds-82447.html
GMAT Timing Planner: This little tool could help you plan timing strategy. Click Below
http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-cat-timing-planner-82513.html

Kudos [?]: 587 [0], given: 13

Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 42

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2009, 11:03
IMO B
OA plz

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 872

Kudos [?]: 867 [0], given: 18

Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2009, 11:08
C for me.
If C is true then there was is no advantage of adding more officers as they will not be able to stop robberies.

B talks more about prevention of robberies by placing officers in the right place. But that is not what the question is asking.

Kudos [?]: 867 [0], given: 18

Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 42

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2009, 11:12
Economist wrote:
C for me.
If C is true then there was is no advantage of adding more officers as they will not be able to stop robberies.

B talks more about prevention of robberies by placing officers in the right place. But that is not what the question is asking.

The reason why the extra(2/3) policemen r patrolling the north side is because of the past year's record. Although some of them might be directing the traffic, still there would be others who would be on guard. But the whole task of assigning police would fail to reduce the robbery count since the original data was faulty as the south side in fact was the place where majority of the robbery actually happened.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 305

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2009, 06:14
IMO B

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 13

Manager
Joined: 10 Jul 2009
Posts: 164

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 8

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2009, 08:02

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 8

Intern
Joined: 28 Jun 2009
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2009, 11:04
Option B

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 60

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2009, 11:58
IMO (B)

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2009
Posts: 181

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2009, 21:49
I will also go with 'B'.

Why no one is arguing for 'E'? If isolating suspect cars remains difficult, it would be of no benefit to increase the number of guards.

What is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 5

Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 15

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Location: Dallas TX

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2009, 08:15
E

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 15

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Location: Dallas TX

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2009, 08:18
can you please post the OA

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Affiliations: ACA, CPA
Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Posts: 433

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 41

Location: Vagabond
Schools: BC
WE 1: Big4, Audit
WE 2: Banking

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2009, 21:36
Vote for C

The question relates to the efficacy of the additional officers being brought in.
If some of the additional officers do not do the intended job then the plan will not work.

IMO B is wrong because - PY trends need not repeat this year . Also the stem of the question clearly states

mall's north parking lot, which sees the most traffic from shoppers.
_________________

If you have made mistakes, there is always another chance for you. You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 41

Senior Manager
Affiliations: ACA, CPA
Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Posts: 433

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 41

Location: Vagabond
Schools: BC
WE 1: Big4, Audit
WE 2: Banking

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2009, 21:39
If anything E will strengthen the argument of having additional cops.

The same problem existed in the PY so by adding more cops it should stem the problem

eresh wrote:
I will also go with 'B'.

Why no one is arguing for 'E'? If isolating suspect cars remains difficult, it would be of no benefit to increase the number of guards.

What is the OA?

_________________

If you have made mistakes, there is always another chance for you. You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 41

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 342

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 32

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2009, 23:48
A?

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 32

Intern
Joined: 09 Jun 2009
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2009, 03:01
B. definitely. whats the OA pleasE?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: shopping mall   [#permalink] 13 Aug 2009, 03:01

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 42 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by