GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 21 Jan 2019, 16:11

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### GMAT Club Tests are Free & Open for Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday!

January 21, 2019

January 21, 2019

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

Mark your calendars - All GMAT Club Tests are free and open January 21st for celebrate Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday.
• ### The winners of the GMAT game show

January 22, 2019

January 22, 2019

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

In case you didn’t notice, we recently held the 1st ever GMAT game show and it was awesome! See who won a full GMAT course, and register to the next one.

# The existentialists are right about one thing: we are alone,

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 242

### Show Tags

15 May 2010, 06:39
4
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

46% (01:37) correct 54% (01:37) wrong based on 161 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The existentialists are right about one thing: we are alone, radically alone. The proof is obvious. Suppose you were born with a physiology that permitted you to perceive only negative images, that is, you saw black where everyone else saw white and white where everyone else saw black. Nevertheless, you would learn to call what you saw as black by the name “white” because this is what you would be taught, and there would be no way that you could discover your error.
Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the statements in the argument above?
(A) Some people are born with reversed perceptions of black and white, and they cannot discover this.
(B) People with reversed perceptions of black and white would not choose their words any differently from anyone else.
(C) Existentialism is a sound philosophy, as is amply demonstrated by the physiology of color perception.
(D) The existentialists claim that some people are born with reversed perceptions of black and white.
(E) The existentialists claim that people mean different things when they use the words “black” and “white.”
Manager
Joined: 01 Feb 2010
Posts: 233

### Show Tags

15 May 2010, 07:38
nverma wrote:
The existentialists are right about one thing: we are alone, radically alone. The proof is obvious. Suppose you were born with a physiology that permitted you to perceive only negative images, that is, you saw black where everyone else saw white and white where everyone else saw black. Nevertheless, you would learn to call what you saw as black by the name “white” because this is what you would be taught, and there would be no way that you could discover your error.
Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the statements in the argument above?
(A) Some people are born with reversed perceptions of black and white, and they cannot discover this.
(B) People with reversed perceptions of black and white would not choose their words any differently from anyone else.
(C) Existentialism is a sound philosophy, as is amply demonstrated by the physiology of color perception.
(D) The existentialists claim that some people are born with reversed perceptions of black and white.
(E) The existentialists claim that people mean different things when they use the words “black” and “white.”

A,B,D,E are all focussed on one thing difference b/w black and white.
C seems to be the best choice.
Senior Manager
Affiliations: SPG
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 301

### Show Tags

15 May 2010, 10:22
1
IMO B

(A) Some people are born with reversed perceptions of black and white, and they cannot discover this. --> the passage never assumes anything about "some" people being born with reversed perceptions .... the reversed preception is just an example
(B) People with reversed perceptions of black and white would not choose their words any differently from anyone else.Correct
(C) Existentialism is a sound philosophy, as is amply demonstrated by the physiology of color perception.the author never comments on the soundness of the philosophy
(D) The existentialists claim that some people are born with reversed perceptions of black and white.the existentialists never claimed that
(E) The existentialists claim that people mean different things when they use the words “black” and “white.”the existentialists never claimed this
Intern
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 23
Location: I see you

### Show Tags

16 May 2010, 18:36
stuck between B and D, but since there are no claims by the existentialists in the argument I'll go with B.
_________________

Be willing to fail. It's the price of greatness.

VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1258
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2010, 03:08
I am with E on this monster.. nverma...pls OA
Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 103

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2010, 05:40
I feel C .

Ne way does this black white swap actually happens ?
_________________

R E S P E C T

Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience

GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1323

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2010, 15:51
From the question, "you would learn to call what you saw as black by the name “white”... and there would be no way that you could discover your error." Even if you saw 'white' differently from everyone else, you'd still learn to use the word 'white' to refer to that color. You would not use different labels than other people do. That's what answer choice B says.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 121
WE 1: 3 (Mining Operations)

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2010, 04:15
First I went with C, but after carefully observing :"existentialists " Vs "Existentialism", I realised that I am standing over "Shell Mine". I quickly ran towards B, and finding it better.
Whats the OA.
_________________

Regards,
Invincible...
"The way to succeed is to double your error rate."
"Most people who succeed in the face of seemingly impossible conditions are people who simply don't know how to quit."

Intern
Affiliations: NCC,SAE,YHIA
Joined: 04 May 2010
Posts: 37
Location: Mumbai , India
WE 1: 3 years international sales & mktg-projects

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2010, 12:23
Existentialists :people who believe the philosophy that every individual is responsible for his or her own development
Conclusion- existentialists are right that we are alone
proof is obvious
Premise 2 - you see black where every one saw white vise versa.
premise 3- Nevertheless (meaning still) , you will call perceived black as white (since you are taught to call it white) & vice versa, and will never discover the error

To sum it up : even though you see black instead of white (as it is seen by others) , you will still call it white because this is how you are taught. This is proves that existentialist's claim that we are alone is right.

Now we have understood the argument , lets see what we can infer.
We will start weighing each choice, however we shall keep following in mind:-
1.inference shall not come straight from the argument , something must be deduced.
2.No new information is allowed.
3.We shall not infer much and shall not go a step beyond the argument.

A. Some people are born with reversed perceptions of black and white, and they cannot discover this.

Color perception is just an hypothetical example , used in the argument, to drive home the point that what we perceive might not be true. Therefore it will be wrong to infer much about the hypothesis.

B.People with reversed perceptions of black and white would not choose their words any differently from anyone else.

Very confusing , looks good , let us test every word.
It seems to be out of scope, argument clearly states that a person is taught to call some color as white or black, inferring what a person would like to call , will be going step ahead , as argument has settled the case by suggesting that person calls a color , what he or she is taught to call that color.

However choice B can be considered an assumption.

C.Existentialism is a sound philosophy, as is amply demonstrated by the physiology of color perception.

This option can be safely deduced from the the argument, since existentialists are right it can be inferred that the philosophy is also sound.

We only inferred that if believers of one philosophy are right , than the philosophy might be sound.
This is the essence of inference question , infer as little as possible.

D.The existentialists claim that some people are born with reversed perceptions of black and white.

Same problem as in case of choice A, Color perception is just an hypothetical example.
Moreover existentialists never claimed anything regarding color perception , this premise (color perception0 is introduced by author to support conclusion.

E.The existentialists claim that people mean different things when they use the words “black” and “white.”
Again existentialists never claimed any thing regarding what people perceive , it is introduced as an example to support the conclusion that existentialists are right.

IMO answer is C, hope its right
_________________

Sun Tzu-Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.

Intern
Affiliations: NCC,SAE,YHIA
Joined: 04 May 2010
Posts: 37
Location: Mumbai , India
WE 1: 3 years international sales & mktg-projects

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2010, 10:59
Sorry guys , I have also started to think its B.

B.People with reversed perceptions of black and white would not choose their words any differently from anyone else.

According to passage people will learn to call a color what others call , therefore it can be inferred that they will not call the color something other than what they are taught.

Just a bit off topic , Will it help to solve a couple of LSAT logic problems every now and then?
My friend gave me a couple of LSAT tests , I just want to know if they are not off topic and waste of time....
_________________

Sun Tzu-Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 436

### Show Tags

06 May 2011, 05:29
this is a very simple question. option A is not confusing at all. it says 'some people are born with reversed perception' how can that be ascertained ? suppose no one is born with reversed perception ? we have no way to know so A is out no doubt.

CDE are all garbage , only B is consistent with the 'suppose...'

and OA is B , i have confirmed after googling this question.
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1013

### Show Tags

06 May 2011, 06:23
B seems more of an assumption answer choice.Negating it breaks down the proof itself.
Intern
Joined: 02 Mar 2015
Posts: 24
Re: The existentialists are right about one thing: we are alone,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2016, 03:05
IMO B, i reached their through process of elimination.

The existentialists are right about one thing: we are alone, radically alone. The proof is obvious. Suppose you were born with a physiology that permitted you to perceive only negative images, that is, you saw black where everyone else saw white and white where everyone else saw black. Nevertheless, you would learn to call what you saw as black by the name “white” because this is what you would be taught, and there would be no way that you could discover your error.
Which one of the following can be validly inferred from the statements in the argument above?

(A) Some people are born with reversed perceptions of black and white, and they cannot discover this. -->Incorrect, last line of the passage tells about it. rather they are taught the opposite.

(B) People with reversed perceptions of black and white would not choose their words any differently from anyone else. -> Skipped this and moved to option C.

(C) Existentialism is a sound philosophy, as is amply demonstrated by the physiology of color perception. --> Incorrect as in the passage we are talking about existentialists and no where about the philosophy.

(D) The existentialists claim that some people are born with reversed perceptions of black and white.--> INCORRECT no where it it mentioned what they think. OOS

(E) The existentialists claim that people mean different things when they use the words “black” and “white.” --> The never claimed about it.

Left with option B.
Current Student
Joined: 17 Jun 2016
Posts: 504
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.65
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: The existentialists are right about one thing: we are alone,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2016, 20:44
E IMO..can somebody provide oa

Posted from my mobile device
_________________
Intern
Joined: 30 Dec 2018
Posts: 23
Re: The existentialists are right about one thing: we are alone,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jan 2019, 04:14
Why not E? It's an inference based question so the same can be concluded.

Posted from my mobile device
Re: The existentialists are right about one thing: we are alone, &nbs [#permalink] 13 Jan 2019, 04:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by