GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 20 Aug 2018, 15:40

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 896
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 24 Jul 2013, 04:26
10
33
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

52% (01:01) correct 48% (00:58) wrong based on 1488 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.

A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would

B) must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel

C) are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel

D) will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would

E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would

Originally posted by joemama142000 on 09 Dec 2005, 16:39.
Last edited by Zarrolou on 24 Jul 2013, 04:26, edited 2 times in total.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2622
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2013, 07:36
9
9
fozzzy wrote:
can someone provide a detailed analysis on this one. Thanks!

Hi fozzy,
There you go.

The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.

Since the meaning is pretty simple to understand, let’s proceed to the Error Analysis.

ERROR ANALYSIS:

1. The federal rules were made to ensure two things:
• patients must be warned of potential risks, and
• an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted
The first entity is preceded by “that”, but the second one is not. We need before the second entity as well.

2. Use of “would evaluate” is correct because the main verb for this part of the sentence is written in simple past tense “was conducted”. Since the sentence is written in simple past tense, we must use past tense of “will” that is “would” here.
Now the entities in the list must be parallel. Since we have two clauses as entities, the context of the sentence requires that there be consistency in the verb tenses. Hence we need “would be warned”.
3. Also, “ensure” does not need the use of subjunctive verb. So “would be warned” will take care of this issue too.

PoE:

A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would: Incorrect for the reasons stated above.

B) must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel: Incorrect.
1. This choice repeats the verb tense (must) error as in choice A.
2. There is no need for subjunctive verb here. We do need “would” not only before “evaluate” but also before “be warned of”.

C) are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel: Incorrect.
1. Use of “are warned” is incorrect because the context of the sentence is set in the past tense.
2. Same “would” error as in choice B.
3. “warned of” is more formal than “warned about”. The latter is more colloquial. Hence, “warned of” is better

D) will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would: Incorrect.
1. Use of “will be warned” leads to verb tense error
2. “that” is missing before the second entity in the list.

E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would: Correct.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

##### General Discussion
VP
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1094
Location: CA

### Show Tags

09 Dec 2005, 16:47
1
2
E.

would is required to indicate future, unseen, effects of federal rules.
C is incorect: tense not consistent. "it was conducted" in non-underlined portion indicates past tense.
_________________

Whether you think you can or think you can't. You're right! - Henry Ford (1863 - 1947)

Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 896

### Show Tags

09 Dec 2005, 18:05
If the sentence were modified would this be correct?

The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments are established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.

The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments are established to ensure that patients will be warned of potential risks and an independent panel will evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.
SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1832
Re: SC federal rules  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Dec 2005, 19:58
1
2
joemama142000 wrote:
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.

A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would

B) must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel

C) are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel

D) will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would

E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would

E for parallel structure and parallel tenses and correct idiom "be warned of"
Manager
Joined: 04 Jul 2005
Posts: 103
Re: SC federal rules  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Dec 2005, 09:30
E,//lism would be warned of and would evaluate

I thought warn about is a correct idiom but now I know that I was wrong
thanks guys for posting this question
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5092

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2005, 07:19
Late, but E for the consistent use of the modal would.
Manager
Joined: 13 Jul 2010
Posts: 148
Re: SC federal rules  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Nov 2010, 18:42
Yurik79 wrote:
joemama142000 wrote:
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.

A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would

B) must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel

C) are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel

D) will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would

E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would

I vote for D

D would not be correct as it is missing the "that" to be parallel with to ensure "that" patients...
Intern
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Posts: 32
Re: SC federal rules  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Nov 2010, 22:06
1
1
E for parallel construction (that.. that..) and subjunctive usgae ( were - would )
_________________

Kudos Never costs your Pocket ! Give when u feel it worthy

Manager
Joined: 04 May 2009
Posts: 59
Location: Astoria, NYC
Re: SC federal rules  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2010, 08:19
I picked E not even for parrallelism but for the usage of: would be warned of.....rather than warned about...
We usually would get warned of danger rather than about
Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 125
Re: SC federal rules  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2010, 21:50
anish319 wrote:
I picked E not even for parrallelism but for the usage of: would be warned of.....rather than warned about...
We usually would get warned of danger rather than about

I think your point is valid. Can somebody explain?
Intern
Joined: 23 Jun 2010
Posts: 32
Re: SC federal rules  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2011, 15:01
1
I originally picked E for ||ism. But after reaching MGMAT SC and a couple of OG examples where words like 'rule' and 'laws' are associated with MUST instead of COULD/SHOULD/WOULD (since laws are mandatory and words like would/should/could imply one has a choice in obeying the law...) , I decided to go with B because that is the only option that has MUST in the beginning and removes WOULD from the second half. It didn't make sense to me but I went by the rules in MGMAT and OG. Turns out there are exceptions to the rule

How to avoid this trap?
_________________

-DK
---------------------------------------------------------
If you like what you read then give a Kudos!
Diagnostic Test: 620
The past is a guidepost, not a hitching post.
---------------------------------------------------------

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 532
Re: SC federal rules  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2011, 11:58
warned of and warned about ? warned about is wrong usage .
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Director
Status: No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 549
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jan 2012, 02:05
2
would is needed for future potentiality and parallel construction (that.. that..)
Thus E.
_________________

Collections:-
PSof OG solved by GC members: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-ps-with-solution-from-gmatclub-110005.html
DS of OG solved by GC members: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-ds-with-solution-from-gmatclub-110004.html
100 GMAT PREP Quantitative collection http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-problem-collections-114358.html
Collections of work/rate problems with solutions http://gmatclub.com/forum/collections-of-work-rate-problem-with-solutions-118919.html
Mixture problems in a file with best solutions: http://gmatclub.com/forum/mixture-problems-with-best-and-easy-solutions-all-together-124644.html

Director
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 813
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2013, 03:22
can someone provide a detailed analysis on this one. Thanks!
_________________

Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...

Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/

GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-software-analysis-and-what-if-scenarios-146146.html

VP
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1096
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2013, 04:39
2
1
fozzzy wrote:
can someone provide a detailed analysis on this one. Thanks!

The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.

The sentence says "evaluate" so we cannot place an "an independent panel" before (is singular). Out B and C.
The sentence also says "were", hence we are talking about the past; so the verb "will" is not correct.
If we are in the past, and we want to make a prediction about the future "would" is correct over "will". This eliminates option D.

A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would
E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would

The parallelism in A is not correct, E, on the other hand, is perfectly parallel: to ensure patients would be warned and that an independent panel would .
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Intern
Joined: 06 Sep 2012
Posts: 12
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Sustainability
GPA: 3.11
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2013, 07:27
egmat wrote:
fozzzy wrote:
can someone provide a detailed analysis on this one. Thanks!

Hi fozzy,
There you go.

The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.

Since the meaning is pretty simple to understand, let’s proceed to the Error Analysis.

ERROR ANALYSIS:

1. The federal rules were made to ensure two things:
• patients must be warned of potential risks, and
• an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted
The first entity is preceded by “that”, but the second one is not. We need before the second entity as well.

2. Use of “would evaluate” is correct because the main verb for this part of the sentence is written in simple past tense “was conducted”. Since the sentence is written in simple past tense, we must use past tense of “will” that is “would” here.
Now the entities in the list must be parallel. Since we have two clauses as entities, the context of the sentence requires that there be consistency in the verb tenses. Hence we need “would be warned”.
3. Also, “ensure” does not need the use of subjunctive verb. So “would be warned” will take care of this issue too.

PoE:

A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would: Incorrect for the reasons stated above.

B) must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel: Incorrect.
1. This choice repeats the verb tense (must) error as in choice A.
2. There is no need for subjunctive verb here. We do need “would” not only before “evaluate” but also before “be warned of”.

C) are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel: Incorrect.
1. Use of “are warned” is incorrect because the context of the sentence is set in the past tense.
2. Same “would” error as in choice B.
3. “warned of” is more formal than “warned about”. The latter is more colloquial. Hence, “warned of” is better

D) will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would: Incorrect.
1. Use of “will be warned” leads to verb tense error
2. “that” is missing before the second entity in the list.

E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would: Correct.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.

Dear E-Gmat

ensure that patients are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel......

This uses subjunctive.. can we use subjunctive for ensure ( u said it doesnot needsubjunctive but explain if using subjunctive is wrong.....

Also, here govt did something so that people donot face any problem for the whole future , I mean we can state the intention in simple present ..... so C seems ok to me. Please correct me if I am wrong....
"I removed the obstacle on the road to ensure that no one gets hurt".
Is this sentence wrong too?
Director
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 603
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jun 2016, 02:57
ngocntt wrote:
E,//lism would be warned of and would evaluate

I thought warn about is a correct idiom but now I know that I was wrong
thanks guys for posting this question

The following idioms are correct
Warn about:- I warned John about the impeding danger.
Warned against :- The coach reminded the team about its past performance and warned the team against any kind of complacency
Warn of :- The committee warned the expedition team of intense hostility by the locals.
Warned off :- The sheriff warned off the drunk football fans.

In this case the answer depends more on parallelism than the usage of the idiom "warn about" or "warn of"
_________________

Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly.
FINAL GOODBYE :- 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017 - I am back but for all purposes please consider me semi-retired.

Intern
Joined: 06 Oct 2016
Posts: 5
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2017, 22:38
VerbalBot wrote:
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 415
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2017, 02:06
joemama142000 wrote:
The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of medical experiments were established to ensure that patients must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would evaluate the experiment before it was conducted.

A) must be warned of potential risks and an independent panel would

B) must be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel

C) are warned about potential risks and that an independent panel

D) will be warned about potential risks and an independent panel would

E) would be warned of potential risks and that an independent panel would

this is hardd problem .

one key point is that "before it was conducted" is in the past, so, the whole sentence should be in the past and "would ' is correct.

we need second 'that" , so, only choice E meeet two conditions.
Re: The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of &nbs [#permalink] 09 Nov 2017, 02:06

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The federal rules aimed at protecting human subjects of

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.