Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 878

The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersect [#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jan 2013, 06:33
1
This post received KUDOS
9
This post was BOOKMARKED
Question Stats:
74% (01:41) correct
26% (00:57) wrong based on 277 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Attachment:
Roads.png [ 25.68 KiB  Viewed 7531 times ]
The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersection of three straight roads, each having parallel edges and each having the same width. what is the value of t? (1) r = 140 (2) s = 160
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...
Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/
GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmatprepsoftwareanalysisandwhatifscenarios146146.html
Last edited by Bunuel on 17 Jan 2013, 07:25, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question.



Director
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 878

Re: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersect [#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jan 2013, 07:05
1
This post received KUDOS
My net was lagging and wouldn't let me upload the image.
_________________
Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...
Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/
GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmatprepsoftwareanalysisandwhatifscenarios146146.html



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39680

Re: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersect [#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jan 2013, 07:33
6
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was BOOKMARKED



Director
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 878

Re: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersect [#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jan 2013, 04:37
Seems a very basic question, but what other possible concepts are tested here? The official explanations was pretty convoluted had a parallelogram and all of that.
_________________
Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...
Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/
GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmatprepsoftwareanalysisandwhatifscenarios146146.html



Director
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 538
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)

Re: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersect [#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jan 2013, 23:05
Bunuel wrote: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersection of three straight roads, each having parallel edges and each having the same width. what is the value of t?(1) r = 140. Not sufficient. (2) s = 160. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) Consider the width of the roads to be 0 as shown below: Attachment: Roads.png From the figure we have that r+s+t=360 degrees > 140+160+t=360 > t=60 degrees. Sufficient. Answer: C. Bunnel I have small doubt here Suppose the length is not 0 then you will have two variables and you cannot solve the equation i.e the equation becomes Suppose width=X Then T= 3603XRS and here you have 2 variables and 1 equation you cannot get a single solution Am i right?
_________________
+1 Kudos If found helpful..



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39680

Re: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersect [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jan 2013, 04:58
mydreammba wrote: Bunuel wrote: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersection of three straight roads, each having parallel edges and each having the same width. what is the value of t?(1) r = 140. Not sufficient. (2) s = 160. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) Consider the width of the roads to be 0 as shown below: Attachment: Roads.png From the figure we have that r+s+t=360 degrees > 140+160+t=360 > t=60 degrees. Sufficient. Answer: C. Bunnel I have small doubt here Suppose the length is not 0 then you will have two variables and you cannot solve the equation i.e the equation becomes Suppose width=X Then T= 3603XRS and here you have 2 variables and 1 equation you cannot get a single solution Am i right? No you are not. The edges of the road are parallel, so there is 0 degree angle between them.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Director
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 538
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)

Re: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersect [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jan 2013, 07:57
Bunuel wrote: mydreammba wrote: Bunuel wrote: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersection of three straight roads, each having parallel edges and each having the same width. what is the value of t?(1) r = 140. Not sufficient. (2) s = 160. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) Consider the width of the roads to be 0 as shown below: Attachment: Roads.png From the figure we have that r+s+t=360 degrees > 140+160+t=360 > t=60 degrees. Sufficient. Answer: C. Bunnel I have small doubt here Suppose the length is not 0 then you will have two variables and you cannot solve the equation i.e the equation becomes Suppose width=X Then T= 3603XRS and here you have 2 variables and 1 equation you cannot get a single solution Am i right? No you are not. The edges of the road are parallel, so there is 0 degree angle between them. Thanks Bunnel Got it
_________________
+1 Kudos If found helpful..



Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 97
Location: India
GMAT Date: 10252012
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)

Re: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersect [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Feb 2013, 06:44
Quote: (1)+(2) Consider the width of the roads to be 0 as shown below: Bunuel  can you please elaborate it further ? why do we need to make this assumption ? Regards.
_________________
if my post helped you, let me know by pressing Kudos...



MBA Section Director
Status: Back to work...
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Posts: 4395
Location: India
City: Pune
GPA: 3.4
WE: Business Development (Manufacturing)

Re: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersect [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Feb 2013, 08:19
anshunadir wrote: Quote: (1)+(2) Consider the width of the roads to be 0 as shown below: Bunuel  can you please elaborate it further ? why do we need to make this assumption ? Regards. Go thru the file attached. Then you will understand the point which Bunuel is making. Regards, Abhijit
_________________
Every Wednesday: Meet MBA Experts in Chat Room and Ask Your MostPressing MBA Admission Questions to them in a Live Chat.
Must Read Forum Topics Before You Kick Off Your MBA Application
New GMAT Club Decision Tracker  Real Time Decision Updates



Intern
Joined: 28 May 2012
Posts: 4

Re: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersect [#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Sep 2014, 06:25
Hi Guys,
I assumed Angle R = Angle S due to the parallel lines property. Hence for me each statement was sufficient. Why is R not equal to S?



Manager
Status: I am not a product of my circumstances. I am a product of my decisions
Joined: 20 Jan 2013
Posts: 132
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GPA: 3.92
WE: Operations (Energy and Utilities)

Re: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersect [#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Sep 2014, 21:48
piyusharma wrote: Hi Guys,
I assumed Angle R = Angle S due to the parallel lines property. Hence for me each statement was sufficient. Why is R not equal to S? Because the two parallel lines you considered are not cut by the same traversal. So angle R is not equal to angle S.



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7440
Location: Pune, India

Re: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersect [#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Sep 2014, 22:55
piyusharma wrote: Hi Guys,
I assumed Angle R = Angle S due to the parallel lines property. Hence for me each statement was sufficient. Why is R not equal to S? Also note that in DS questions, the two statements never contradict each other. If you had assumed that angle R = angle S, the two statements should have told you that that is not true. Statement 1 tells you that angle R is 140. According to you, then angle S should be 140 too. But statement 2 tells you that angle S is 160. This means there is something wrong in your assumption.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep  GMAT Instructor My Blog
Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199
Veritas Prep Reviews



GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 15976

Re: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersect [#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Oct 2015, 04:34
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Books  GMAT Club Tests  Best Prices on GMAT Courses  GMAT Mobile App  Math Resources  Verbal Resources



Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 3460
GPA: 3.82

Re: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersect [#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Oct 2015, 11:56
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution. Attachment:
Roads.png [ 25.68 KiB  Viewed 2168 times ]
The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersection of three straight roads, each having parallel edges and each having the same width. what is the value of t? (1) r = 140 (2) s = 160 From the original condition, we can see that there are 3 variables (r,s,t), and one equation (r+s+t=360), so we need 2 more equations, which are given from the 2 conditions, so there is high chance (C) will be our answer. Looking at the conditions together, r+s+t=140+160+t=360, so it answers the question 'yes', and the answer becomes (C). For cases where we need 2 more equation, such as original conditions with “2 variables”, or “3 variables and 1 equation”, or “4 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 70% chance that C is the answer, while E has 25% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since C is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, D or E.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare The oneandonly World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy. Find a 10% off coupon code for GMAT Club members. “Receive 5 Math Questions & Solutions Daily” Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons  try it yourself See our Youtube demo



GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 15976

Re: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersect [#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Jan 2017, 07:50
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Books  GMAT Club Tests  Best Prices on GMAT Courses  GMAT Mobile App  Math Resources  Verbal Resources



Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2016
Posts: 10

Re: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersect [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Mar 2017, 11:16
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: piyusharma wrote: Hi Guys,
I assumed Angle R = Angle S due to the parallel lines property. Hence for me each statement was sufficient. Why is R not equal to S? Also note that in DS questions, the two statements never contradict each other. If you had assumed that angle R = angle S, the two statements should have told you that that is not true. Statement 1 tells you that angle R is 140. According to you, then angle S should be 140 too. But statement 2 tells you that angle S is 160. This means there is something wrong in your assumption. Can you please explain how to answer this question?




Re: The figure above shows a construction plan for the intersect
[#permalink]
27 Mar 2017, 11:16







