GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 24 Mar 2019, 16:40

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# The first and most important rule of legitimate or popular g

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 722
The first and most important rule of legitimate or popular g  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 24 Mar 2011, 22:33
2
Question 1
00:00

based on 30 sessions

36% (01:56) correct 64% (03:43) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

based on 27 sessions

55% (01:49) correct 45% (00:48) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00

based on 25 sessions

38% (00:52) correct 63% (00:55) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Pls let me know the paraphrase of the lines in blue. Passage map is welcome so that I can align my thoughts with yours. Line numbers are in red. Cheers

The first and most important rule of legitimate or popular government, that is to say, of government whose object is the good of the people, is therefore, as I have observed, to follow
in everything the general will. But to follow this will it is necessary to know it, and above all to distinguish it from the particular will, beginning with one's self: this distinction is always very difficult to make, and only the most sublime virtue can afford sufficient illumination for it. As, in order to will, it is necessary to be free, a difficulty no less great than the former arises ? that of preserving at once the public liberty and the authority of government. Look into the motives which have induced men, once united by their common needs in a general society, to unite themselves still more intimately by means of civil societies: you will find no other motive than that of assuring the property, life and liberty of each member by the protection of all. But can men be forced to defend the liberty of any one among them, without trespassing on that of others? And how can they provide for the public needs, without alienating the individual property of those who are forced to contribute to them? With whatever sophistry all this may be covered over, it is certain that if any constraint can be laid on my will, I am no longer free, and that I am no longer master of my own property, if any one else can lay a hand on it. This difficulty, which would have seemed insurmountable, has been removed, like the first, by the most sublime of all human institutions, or rather by a divine inspiration, which teaches mankind to imitate here below the unchangeable decrees of the Deity. By what inconceivable art has a means been found of making men free by making them subject; of using in the service of the State the properties, the persons andeven the lives of all its members, without constraining and without consulting them; of confining their will by their own admission; of overcoming their refusal by that consent, and forcing them to punish themselves, when they act against their own will? How can it be that all should obey, yet nobody take upon him to command, and that all
should serve, and yet have no masters, but be the more free, as, in apparent subjection, each loses no part of his liberty but what might be hurtful to that of another? These wonders are the work of law. It is to law alone that men owe justice and liberty. It is this salutary organ of the will of all which establishes, in civil right, the natural equality between men. It is this celestial voice which dictates to each citizen the precepts of public reason, and teaches him to act according to the rules of his own judgment, and not to behave inconsistently with himself. It is with this voice alone that political rulers should speak when they command; for no sooner does one man, setting aside the law, claim to subject another to his private will, than he departs from the state of civil society, and confronts him face to face in the pure state of nature, in which obedience is prescribed solely by necessity.
1. The paradox in line 28 is resolved according to the author when an individual
A. submits to the rule of law and thus is at liberty to do anything that does not harm another person
B. behaves according to the natural rights of man and not according to imposed rules
C. agrees to follow the rule of law even when it is against his best interests
D. belongs to a society which guarantees individual liberty at all times
E. follows the will of the majority

2. The author?s attitude to law in this passage is best conveyed as
A. respect for its inalienable authority
B. extolling its importance as a human institution
C. resignation to the need for its imposition on the majority
D. acceptance of its restrictions
E. praise for its divine origin

3. The author would agree with all of the following except
A. government must maintain its authority without unduly compromising personal liberty
B. individual freedom is threatened in the absence of law
C. justice cannot be ensured in the absence of law
D. political leaders should use the law as their guide to correct leadership
E. the law recognizes that all men are capable of recognizing what is in the general interest

Originally posted by gmat1220 on 02 Mar 2011, 17:51.
Last edited by gmat1220 on 24 Mar 2011, 22:33, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Affiliations: CFA Level 2
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 248
Location: Hanoi

### Show Tags

19 Mar 2011, 08:51
Wow, where did you get this passage?? My answers after 6 mins guessing are C B A
_________________
"Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'r gonna get"
Intern
Status: GMAT Tutor, MBA Application Consultant
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 9
Location: New York City
Schools: NYU Stern MBA

### Show Tags

24 Mar 2011, 21:08
Wow, this is very dense stuff. Here's my take on the text in blue (paraphrased):

- How is it possible to make someone free by making them a slave?
- How is it possible to use, for a country's own benefit, its citizens and their property, without their permission?
- How is it possible to claim that people want to limit their own potential/ambition, and, when they refuse these limitations, to enforce them by citing that they wanted these limitations in the first place. Then, as a result, people end up punishing themselves when they act against such limitations.

It's not exact, but I think it captures the gist.

[highlight]--
MBA Gambit
NYC GMAT Tutoring and MBA Application Consulting[/highlight]
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 722

### Show Tags

24 Mar 2011, 22:32
hello mbagambit

Can you pls shed light on question Q 1) option C. I found it catchy and tempting.

This is mine. My paraphrase of passage -
Good govt -follow general will. Free will = lawless hence problematic. Can men be trusted to defend others ? This problem is fixed when man obey law. Law = astounding, surprising since it confines them, yet everyone obey. Law enforces natural equality of men and dictates men to behave consitently. Political leaders should consider law when they command. when someone subjugates the other then victim's obedience is derived from necessity and not natural.

mbagambit wrote:
Wow, this is very dense stuff. Here's my take on the text in blue (paraphrased):

- How is it possible to make someone free by making them a slave?
- How is it possible to use, for a country's own benefit, its citizens and their property, without their permission?
- How is it possible to claim that people want to limit their own potential/ambition, and, when they refuse these limitations, to enforce them by citing that they wanted these limitations in the first place. Then, as a result, people end up punishing themselves when they act against such limitations.

It's not exact, but I think it captures the gist.

[highlight]--
MBA Gambit
NYC GMAT Tutoring and MBA Application Consulting[/highlight]
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 422

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2011, 19:25
took me roughly 9 minutes. and the 3rd question confused between B and E, but that was under time pressure and i misread the question , E is still not very clear in question 3
Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 179
Re: Pls let me know the paraphrase of the lines in blue. Passage  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Dec 2011, 10:30
IMO C, E and D.

Any chances of getting the OAs now?

_________________
Consider KUDOS if you feel the effort's worth it
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 3737
Re: The first and most important rule of legitimate or popular g  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2019, 05:22
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: The first and most important rule of legitimate or popular g   [#permalink] 26 Feb 2019, 05:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by