It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 19:58

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 432

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Oct 2006, 13:35
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:29) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.

When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.

Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?

(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.
(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.
(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.
(D) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.
(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 76

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

Location: New York City

Show Tags

30 Oct 2006, 13:46

It would be impossible for any to become a nominee...It is a deadlock situation.
_________________

'Hakuna matata'

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1011

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

30 Oct 2006, 20:04
punnu_mba wrote:

It would be impossible for any to become a nominee...It is a deadlock situation.

For the same reason E.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1161

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

01 Nov 2006, 06:12
E 2. posted before.

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1438

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)

Show Tags

01 Nov 2006, 07:14
Go with E.

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 13

01 Nov 2006, 07:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.