It is currently 12 Dec 2017, 21:42

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an

Author Message
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 851

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 0

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2006, 11:02
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.
When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.
Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?
(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.
(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.
(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.
(D) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 743

Kudos [?]: 212 [0], given: 0

Location: Dallas, Texas

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2006, 11:41
E !

Say A and B are prospective nominees. By rule, before A gives consent, A has to know who is the other nominee. But B has not given the consent so he is not officially a nominee. So A can't give consent either (by the rule).
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Kudos [?]: 212 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1438

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2006, 21:23
E it is.. This is similar to the question on the nations signing a treaty amongst themselves ..the question was posted by AK_IDC.

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 13

Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2006, 22:15
AgrEE

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

24 Nov 2006, 22:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.