Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 19:45 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 19:45

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 May 2011
Posts: 136
Own Kudos [?]: 1342 [24]
Given Kudos: 8
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Mar 2011
Posts: 229
Own Kudos [?]: 725 [3]
Given Kudos: 20
Location: Texas
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 May 2011
Posts: 136
Own Kudos [?]: 1342 [2]
Given Kudos: 8
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 May 2010
Posts: 200
Own Kudos [?]: 107 [2]
Given Kudos: 7
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
Send PM
Re: The forest ranger explained to the group on the ecology walk that the [#permalink]
2
Kudos
I go with D.

There is a lengthy process to go from sand to soil which has enough nutrients to support maple and beeches. This assumes that sand does not have enough nutrients on its own to support maple and beeches.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Mar 2011
Status:Applying in Round 2
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
Schools: Stern '14
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Send PM
Re: The forest ranger explained to the group on the ecology walk that the [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Tough question... agree with D
Intern
Intern
Joined: 31 May 2015
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Re: The forest ranger explained to the group on the ecology walk that the [#permalink]
Sorry, but can anyone point out the question No in OG for that question? I can't find in the OG and the way of reasoning doesn't sound like a GMAT type to me.

Thanks :)
Director
Director
Joined: 28 Nov 2014
Posts: 754
Own Kudos [?]: 1263 [0]
Given Kudos: 86
Concentration: Strategy
GPA: 3.71
Send PM
Re: The forest ranger explained to the group on the ecology walk that the [#permalink]
hanminhee I don't think that this question comes from OG. Probably it is wrongly tagged.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 31 May 2015
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Re: The forest ranger explained to the group on the ecology walk that the [#permalink]
Keats: Thanks :)
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 May 2016
Posts: 72
Own Kudos [?]: 86 [0]
Given Kudos: 362
Send PM
Re: The forest ranger explained to the group on the ecology walk that the [#permalink]
I am bit confused in this ....
See this way.... By following series of steps, Result that includes beeches and maples, is arrived. Now the result is intact after that. now assumed Nothing has changed after the result. so marked E. but latter thought it cud be something changed but did not affect the result.

Experts , please tell me is my reasoning correct to remove E.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2016
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 101 [0]
Given Kudos: 66
Send PM
Re: The forest ranger explained to the group on the ecology walk that the [#permalink]
hanminhee wrote:
Sorry, but can anyone point out the question No in OG for that question? I can't find in the OG and the way of reasoning doesn't sound like a GMAT type to me.

Thanks :)


Exactly !! Doesnt look like an OG question at all.
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 3480
Own Kudos [?]: 5134 [1]
Given Kudos: 1431
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Send PM
Re: The forest ranger explained to the group on the ecology walk that the [#permalink]
Expert Reply
This question is lame. Is it really from the OG?

That the forest ranger is assuming that sand cannot support those trees is not clear. That they won't grow in sand seems to be less an assumption and more an established fact.

It would make just as much sense, meaning almost no sense, to say that he is assuming that the trees he believes to be beech trees are actually beech trees, or to say that he is assuming that trees need nutrients.

Ridiculous ...
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Status:To infinity and beyond
Posts: 216
Own Kudos [?]: 506 [0]
Given Kudos: 34
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
GPA: 3.31
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: The forest ranger explained to the group on the ecology walk that the [#permalink]
Between D and E I chose D because negating D breaks the argument. Negating E does not do anything. D it is.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Nov 2020
Posts: 119
Own Kudos [?]: 25 [0]
Given Kudos: 96
Send PM
Re: The forest ranger explained to the group on the ecology walk that the [#permalink]
This one of the easiest of all the assumptions just read the last two lines of the passage that's were the answer is stored
, it says that soil enrichment through the growth is preceded before the growth of maple therefore all other option either being out of context or clearly not alligning with passage hence IMO D
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The forest ranger explained to the group on the ecology walk that the [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne