It is currently 27 Jun 2017, 09:13

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The function f is defined for all positive integers n by the

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 92
The function f is defined for all positive integers n by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Apr 2006, 23:05
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

The function f is defined for all positive integers n by the following rule:
f(n) is the number of positive integers each of which is less than n
and has no positive factor in common with n other than 1.if p is any prime number then f(p) =

a. p-1
b. p-2
c. (p+1)/2
d. (p-1)/2
e. 2

OA to follow
VP
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 1053
Location: CA

### Show Tags

28 Apr 2006, 23:30
I'll take a shot at this and take B

All prime numbers have 7 integers less than itself and have no common factor with the prime other than 1

2 ==> 1 (1 is less than 2 but it has a common factor with 2) so 2-2 = 0

3 ==> 1, 2 (only 2 is less than 3 that have no common factor with 3 other than 1) so 3 - 2 = 1

5 ==> 1, 2, 3, 4 (only 2, 3, 4 are less than 5 that have no common factor with 5 other than 1) so 5-2 = 3
_________________

Don't be afraid to take a flying leap of faith.. If you risk nothing, than you gain nothing...

VP
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 1403

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2006, 05:23
Agreed with B!

f(P)= number of items in the set {2,3,4,....(n-1)}
Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Posts: 173
Location: Somewhere in Wisconsin!

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2006, 10:13
Does the expression 'other than 1' means we ought to exclude 1?

Can this expression also mean the numbers are co prime to each other, in which case 1 is an acceptable common factor between n and any number less than it?

_________________

Thanks,
Zooroopa

Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2005
Posts: 224
Location: Milwaukee,WI

### Show Tags

06 May 2006, 17:52
Dinesh are you sure of the OA ? I got this question from gmatprep and the offical answer is A and not B .

Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 659
Location: London

### Show Tags

09 May 2006, 05:05
I've seen this q before and the OA is A, though I get B.
can someone pls explain how it can be A?
Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 192

### Show Tags

09 May 2006, 05:08
the number 1 has no positive factor in common with n other than 1.
so A it is.

Tricky. I thought B first too...
Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 659
Location: London

### Show Tags

09 May 2006, 05:14
kook44 wrote:
the number 1 has no positive factor in common with n other than 1.
so A it is.

Tricky. I thought B first too...

Oh yes, thar's it !! Tricky question.
09 May 2006, 05:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by