Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 May 2017, 07:51

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The Gaul chronicler Peter, recorded the sack of Rome by

Author Message
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5222
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 402 [0], given: 0

The Gaul chronicler Peter, recorded the sack of Rome by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2006, 08:11
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (01:39) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The Gaul chronicler Peter, recorded the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, noted laboriously that it was contemporaneous with the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and that sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.

(A) recorded the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, noted laboriously that it was contemporaneous with the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and that sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.
(B) recording the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, notes laboriously that it was contemporaneous to the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and that sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.
(C) recorded the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, while noting laboriously that it was contemporaneous with the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and that sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.
(D) recording the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, notes laboriously that it was contemporaneous on the peace of Antalcidas, the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.
(E) recording the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, notes laboriously that it was contemporaneous with the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.

Last edited by GMATT73 on 01 Sep 2006, 08:41, edited 2 times in total.
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 281
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2006, 08:24
GMATT73 wrote:
The Gaul chronicler Peter, recorded the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, noted laboriously that it was contemporaneous with the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and that sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.

(A) recorded the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, noted laboriously that it was contemporaneous with the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and that sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.
(B) recording the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, notes laboriously that it was contemporaneous to the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and that sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.
(C) recorded the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, noted laboriously that it was contemporaneous with the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and that sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.
(D) recording the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, notes laboriously that it was contemporaneous on the peace of Antalcidas, the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.
(E) recording the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC, notes laboriously that it was contemporaneous with the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius, and that it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra.

I'll go with E a history lesson from a history major
VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1122
Location: India
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2006, 09:05
One more E.

and that it happened nineteen years after X and sixteen years before Y
_________________

Trying hard to conquer Quant.

Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 747
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2006, 09:59
(E)

Here is my explanation :

The Gaul chronicler Peter, recording the sack of Rome by Gauls in 387 BC (participle clause, correctly modifies Peter), notes (correct verb) laboriously that it was contemporaneous with ("with" is the correct preposition) the peace of Antalcidas and the siege of Rhegium by Dionysius (it is contemporaneous with two other incidents), and that (this expletive introduces another parallel idea) it happened nineteen years after the battle of Aegospotami and sixteen years before the battle of Leuctra (after X and before Y).
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Intern
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2006, 11:51
"E" Completely agree with swagatlakshmi's description to the answer
Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3363
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 297 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2006, 12:20
E for me...

first of only D and E use the right tense and connectors.

also i belive the idiom is "contemporaneous with"

E it is..
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5222
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 402 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2006, 01:33
Effortless (E) <---OA. I'll try to find something a little more thought provoking next time.
Director
Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 791
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2006, 04:32
An SC worthy of being an RC.

Yeah, its E because of the way the commas are used, the content within the commas must be a non-restrictive clause. D and E are the only ones that survive. E is parallel.
_________________

Uh uh. I know what you're thinking. "Is the answer A, B, C, D or E?" Well to tell you the truth in all this excitement I kinda lost track myself. But you've gotta ask yourself one question: "Do I feel lucky?" Well, do ya, punk?

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2899
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 289 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2006, 23:37
Thank god I chose E. Its a morale booster. I have noticed that with a little critical look you can break bigger SCs easily compared with smaller SCs.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Last edited by ps_dahiya on 03 Sep 2006, 21:16, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 841
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 1

Re: This week's SC teaser... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2006, 04:07
I choose E.
A and C out -> recorded, noted/noting -> awkward construction. Something wrong as well, can't put my finger on it.
B -> "that sixteen years" is wrong
D-> "contemporaneous on" is not correct
E -> "contemporaneous with" is better.
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5222
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 402 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2006, 04:20
ps_dahiya wrote:
Thank god I chose E. Its a morale booster. I have noticed that with a little critical look you can break bigger SCs easily compared with smaller SCs.

Keep thinking like that and you will refine SCs to the point where they will catapault you into the V 40s.
03 Sep 2006, 04:20
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The record of the past is always incomplete, and the 1 10 Nov 2010, 13:24
A recording system was so secretly installed and operated in 0 07 Mar 2008, 01:07
The geologic record indicates that a desert expands and 3 18 Jan 2008, 21:00
Paleontologists studying the fossil record have estimated 5 30 Nov 2007, 02:04
That every worker has a clean criminal record is of some 2 26 Nov 2007, 05:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by