GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Nov 2018, 21:31

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in November
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829301
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

     November 17, 2018

     November 17, 2018

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Nov. 17, 7 AM PST. Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
  • GMATbuster's Weekly GMAT Quant Quiz # 9

     November 17, 2018

     November 17, 2018

     09:00 AM PST

     11:00 AM PST

    Join the Quiz Saturday November 17th, 9 AM PST. The Quiz will last approximately 2 hours. Make sure you are on time or you will be at a disadvantage.

The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1127
The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Mar 2009, 00:55
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

82% (01:16) correct 18% (00:44) wrong based on 44 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to subtract advertising expenses from their revenues in calculating taxable income. Tobacco companies would then have to pay more taxes. As a consequence, they would raise the prices of their products and this price increase would raise the prices of their products and this price increase would discourage tobacco use.

Which of the following is an additional premise required by the argument above?
(A) Tobacco companies would not offset the payment of extra taxes by reducing costs in other areas.
(B) Tobacco companies would not continue to advertise if they were forced to pay higher taxes.
(C) People would not continue to buy tobacco products if these products were no longer advertised.
(D) The money the government would gain as a result of the increase in tobacco companies’ taxable income would be used to educate the
public about the dangers of tobacco use.
(E) The increase in taxes paid by tobacco companies would be equal to the additional income generated by raising prices.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 775
Re: CR : tobacco companies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Mar 2009, 03:19
Good Q
I feel its A

Say , you are the CEO of Tobacco company
yr corporate Income Tax go up

Conclusion saying "Co. would raise the prices of their products and this price increase would discourage tobacco use."
assuming that "(A) Tobacco companies would not offset the payment of extra taxes by reducing costs in other areas."

dont know abt E though
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-polygons-87336.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 779
Re: CR : tobacco companies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Mar 2009, 23:15
Good question. Agree with A.
This is an assumption or strengthen question.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 557
Re: CR : tobacco companies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2009, 05:00
I guess it's an assumption question though the "additional premises" in question stem generally refers to Strengthen type. Logically assumption, justify and strengthen questions are similar in their types. In all three types we find the justification to hold the conclusion firmly.
_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 127
Re: CR : tobacco companies  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2009, 23:05
priyankur_saha@ml.com wrote:
I guess it's an assumption question though the "additional premises" in question stem generally refers to Strengthen type. Logically assumption, justify and strengthen questions are similar in their types. In all three types we find the justification to hold the conclusion firmly.

I think it should be the assumption question too because it asks to fill the gap in the reasoning (additional premise). A is correct ans because "subtract advertising expenses from their revenues" is equal to "reducing costs in other areas" to reduce the taxable income
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Status: Durham
Affiliations: AIChE, AAEES, EIT
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 9
Location: United States (NC)
GPA: 3.8
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2011, 17:37
Good explanation priyankur. Thx.
_________________

Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever. (Gandhi)

Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 633
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Dec 2011, 00:53
The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to subtract advertising expenses from their revenues in calculating taxable income. Tobacco companies would then have to pay more taxes. As a consequence, they would raise the prices of their products and this price increase would raise the prices of their products and this price increase would discourage tobacco use.

Which of the following is an additional premise required by the argument above?
(A) Tobacco companies would not offset the payment of extra taxes by reducing costs in other areas. => this is the answer. If tobacco companies offset the payment of extra taxes by reducing costs in other area. They will no longer increase price that offer to regular customer
_________________

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 199
Re: The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2012, 01:08
A is the clear answer here. If tobacco companies reduce costs in other areas, then the companies will still have some money to advertise and thus, the use of tobacco will not be discouraged.
_________________

Consider KUDOS if you feel the effort's worth it

GMAT Club Bot
Re: The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to &nbs [#permalink] 03 Jan 2012, 01:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.