It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 20:55

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The health commissioner said that the government had

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 176

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 5

Location: Singapore
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2010, 05:51
E is correct. Maintains parallelism. And it correctly utilizes "would" for possible action in future.

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 5

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Feb 2010
Posts: 98

Kudos [?]: 79 [2], given: 0

Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jun 2010, 07:43
2
This post received
KUDOS
The OA is E.

In the original sentence, the verb "had implemented" is in the past perfect tense, indicating that this event occurred at some point before the commissioner spoke. The verb "will try", however, is in the simple future. When the future is indicated from the point of view of the past, the simple future is not used. Instead, the conditional is required. For example, "The man said that he would buy a new car" is preferable to "The man said that he will buy a new car." We need to find a conditional verb. Moreover, the pronoun "it" begins a new clause and thus requires repetition of "that" in order to make clear, using parallel structure, that this new clause is still something that the commissioner said. For example, "The man said that he would buy a new car and that he would drive it everywhere" is preferable to "The man said that he would buy a new car and he would drive it everywhere."

(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.

(B) This choice does not offer the conditional "would try", though it does offer another "that". The past tense "tried" is definitely wrong here because the trying will happen "in the future" according to the original sentence. Thus this choice changes the meaning unacceptably.
(C) This choice uses the past perfect tense "had tried" where the conditional "would try" is preferred. An extra "that" is needed to make the two clauses "the government had..." and "it had tried" parallel.

(D) This is a tempting choice as it fixes the verb tense to the conditional "would." However, the tense is technically "conditional perfect" (would have tried), which is not the proper tense. Moreover, an extra "that" is needed to make the two clauses "the government had..." and "it would try" parallel.

(E) CORRECT. This choice provides the plain conditional tense and another "that".

Kudos [?]: 79 [2], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2009
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 9

Location: Mumbai
Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jun 2010, 21:31
Prax, I agree that the tense 'would' is required here. but isnt 'that' awkwardly placed.
Doesnt the below sentence sound better ...

The health commissioner said that the government had implemented strict measures to eradicate the contaminated food and, that despite the recent illnesses, it would try to prevent the outbreak from recurring in the future.

Due to this, I picked up A as the option. What is the source of this sentence?

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 9

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 May 2010
Posts: 65

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 4

Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jun 2010, 21:42
engel wrote:
Prax, I agree that the tense 'would' is required here. but isnt 'that' awkwardly placed.
Doesnt the below sentence sound better ...

The health commissioner said that the government had implemented strict measures to eradicate the contaminated food and, that despite the recent illnesses, it would try to prevent the outbreak from recurring in the future.

Due to this, I picked up A as the option. What is the source of this sentence?

E. "That" should be used in order to maintain parallelism

Said that ..... that

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 4

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 237

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 20

Location: Ukraine
Schools: Ross 2013
WE 1: Pharmaceutical industry 5 years, C level
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jun 2010, 06:25
Prax wrote:
The health commissioner said that the government had implemented strict measures to eradicate the contaminated food and, despite the recent illnesses, it will try to prevent the outbreak from recurring in the future.

1. it will try

2. that it tried

3.it had tried

4.it would have tried

5.that it would try



In order to maintain parallelism - we need that.
In order to underline future in the past - we need would, so E

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 20

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1471

Kudos [?]: 792 [0], given: 6

Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jun 2010, 07:33
good explanation by Prax.

E for me.

Kudos [?]: 792 [0], given: 6

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1438

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jun 2010, 14:34
You have explained this problem with amazing clarity and have helped me clear a long standing doubt with regard to the usage of WOULD when it is used for a "future event" with respect to another past event and yet both events are happening in past. Thanks a ton and if I could I would have given you TEN Kudos for this.

Regards


Prax wrote:
The OA is E.

In the original sentence, the verb "had implemented" is in the past perfect tense, indicating that this event occurred at some point before the commissioner spoke. The verb "will try", however, is in the simple future. When the future is indicated from the point of view of the past, the simple future is not used. Instead, the conditional is required. For example, "The man said that he would buy a new car" is preferable to "The man said that he will buy a new car." We need to find a conditional verb. Moreover, the pronoun "it" begins a new clause and thus requires repetition of "that" in order to make clear, using parallel structure, that this new clause is still something that the commissioner said. For example, "The man said that he would buy a new car and that he would drive it everywhere" is preferable to "The man said that he would buy a new car and he would drive it everywhere."

(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.

(B) This choice does not offer the conditional "would try", though it does offer another "that". The past tense "tried" is definitely wrong here because the trying will happen "in the future" according to the original sentence. Thus this choice changes the meaning unacceptably.
(C) This choice uses the past perfect tense "had tried" where the conditional "would try" is preferred. An extra "that" is needed to make the two clauses "the government had..." and "it had tried" parallel.

(D) This is a tempting choice as it fixes the verb tense to the conditional "would." However, the tense is technically "conditional perfect" (would have tried), which is not the proper tense. Moreover, an extra "that" is needed to make the two clauses "the government had..." and "it would try" parallel.

(E) CORRECT. This choice provides the plain conditional tense and another "that".

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 13

3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 163

Kudos [?]: 89 [3], given: 3

Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2010, 08:02
3
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I will go with E.

When there is a simple prediction about the future, we use "will"
With predictions about the future that have been made in the past, we use “would”

example:
Correct: Sam said that he would do his homework by saturday only if he is allowed to play on sunday.
Incorrect: Sam said that he will do his homework by saturday only if he is allowed to play on sunday.

Kudos [?]: 89 [3], given: 3

2 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1471

Kudos [?]: 792 [2], given: 6

Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2010, 13:28
2
This post received
KUDOS
E it is.

We need 'would' because the sentence is written in the past about the future. Also the sentence is parallel with....The health commissioner said that the government.......and that it....

The below should help.

Quote:
OA is E

"despite" is not a conjunction. "And" is a conjunction. "And" also indicates that parallelism is required.

The health commissioner said that the government had implemented strict measures to eradicate the contaminated food and it would try to prevent the outbreak from reccurring in the future.

The health commissioner said that X [a clause] and (that) Y (another clause).

Both clauses are things that the health commissioner said. Further, both clauses start with nouns - in particular, nouns that are the subjects of their respective clauses. Finally, the subject "it" in the second parallel clause is referring to the subject "government" in the first parallel clause. (It's not 100% required for the pronoun to refer specifically to the subject in the first clause, but when it does, that's extra-nice parallelism. :)

Kudos [?]: 792 [2], given: 6

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 416

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 112

Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2010, 23:00
yes E it is !!..in ..reported speech use of "that" is required and will become "would "

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 112

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 167

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 33

WE 1: 3 (Mining Operations)
Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2010, 02:08
Great !!..Its E....I got the point.
Nice learning about " talking in past about future : Use WOULD " Great explanation by seekmba..Good :)
Unfortunately I opted for B,merely considering parallelism.
_________________

Regards,
Invincible...:)
"The way to succeed is to double your error rate."
"Most people who succeed in the face of seemingly impossible conditions are people who simply don't know how to quit."

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 33

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 181

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 11

Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2010, 02:32
I will go with E

The health commissioner said that....and .... that it would try .....in future

for simple prediction in future ...
past tense .. would + verb ... in future
present tense ... will + verb ... in future.

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 11

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 112

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 10

Location: india
Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2010, 13:46
i will still go for A coz of despite recent illnesses

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 10

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 380

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 17

Location: Chicago, IL
Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Aug 2010, 12:47
If E were to be correct, then "that" should be placed before "despite" to itroduce the new clause.
A it is.
_________________

Hard work is the main determinant of success

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 17

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 154

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 1

Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2010, 00:08
But if we use 'that' as in B and E, what does 'it' refer to ? :shock:
_________________


R E S P E C T


Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 416

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 112

Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2010, 03:46
KissGMAT wrote:
But if we use 'that' as in B and E, what does 'it' refer to ? :shock:


what you are saying is absolutely correct .... however if you ook at the other choices , they have " IT " placed after illness. So no way you can make the relation between noun and pronoun clearer So you have to pick the other flaw and correct that .

reg

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 112

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1628

Kudos [?]: 1124 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Dec 2010, 08:22
+1 E

Reported speech. A basic lesson for those whose native language is not English 8-)
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1124 [0], given: 109

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Bring the Rain
Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 389

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 46

Location: United States (MD)
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.13
WE: Corporate Finance (Aerospace and Defense)
Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Dec 2010, 08:36
icandy wrote:
unplugged wrote:
In for A

I don't think 'that' in the first part of sentence and 'that' in E are parallels because 'despite the recent illness' will not belong to either the first part or the second part of the sentence

The below structure in A works fine for me

The health commissioner said that the government had implemented strict measures to eradicate the contaminated food and, despite the recent illnesses, it will try to prevent the outbreak from recurring in the future

Cheers,
Unplugged


Yes, despite the recent illness is a dependent clause and the sentence reads just fine in E, with out the Dependent clause and misses the parallelism with out the "that"

Also, would shows the uncertainty+future correctly.

Had implemented (past perfect)

Said (past)

Would (future + uncertainty)

I am finding it difficult to explain the choice of would over will. I will edit If I come up with better explanation


I got E as well.....good explanation.
_________________

Go Blue!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 46

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: swimming against the current
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 238

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 30

Location: Chennai, India
Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Dec 2010, 08:44
Got E as well. Thanks to Daagh, a fellow GMATclub member, you gave a great Q to understand that llsm
_________________

Gonna make it this time

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 30

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 84

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 6

Location: India
Re: The health commissioner said that the government had [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Dec 2010, 09:47
A.

The choice is between A and E. would be is used for a situation which in all likelihood will not be true. Will is the right word to be used to show future action intention

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 6

Re: The health commissioner said that the government had   [#permalink] 14 Dec 2010, 09:47

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6   7    Next  [ 129 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

The health commissioner said that the government had

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.