GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Oct 2018, 01:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The income categories of Senator Crocker’s proposed tax code are as br

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2013
Posts: 24
The income categories of Senator Crocker’s proposed tax code are as br  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 26 Sep 2017, 01:23
1
9
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

59% (01:36) correct 41% (01:40) wrong based on 352 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The income categories of Senator Crocker’s proposed tax code are as broad as to fail to distinguish the sale of an old chair at a pawnshop from collecting profits in a sophisticated stock option move.

(A) as broad as to fail to distinguish the sale of an old chair at a pawnshop from collecting profits in

(B) as broad as to fail in distinguishing between the sale of an old chair at a pawnshop and collecting profits from

(C) so broad as to fail to distinguish selling an old chair at a pawnshop and collecting profits from

(D) so broad as to fail to distinguish selling an old chair at a pawnshop from collecting profits in

(E) so broad that he fails in distinguishing between selling chair at a pawnshop from the profits in

Originally posted by gmatgambler on 05 Apr 2014, 07:26.
Last edited by hazelnut on 26 Sep 2017, 01:23, edited 2 times in total.
Edited the question.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2012
Posts: 289
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 2: 770 Q50 V47
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The income categories of Senator Crocker’s proposed tax code are as br  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Apr 2014, 07:41
3
1
gmatgambler wrote:
The income categories of Senator Crocker’s proposed tax code are as broad as to fail to distinguish the sale of an old chair at a pawnshop from collecting profits in a sophisticated stock option move.

A)as broad as to fail to distinguish the sale of an old chair at a pawnshop from collecting profits in

B)as broad as to fail in distinguishing between the sale of an old chair at a pawnshop and collecting profits from

C)so broad as to fail to distinguish selling an old chair at a pawnshop and collecting profits from

D)so broad as to fail to distinguish selling an old chair at a pawnshop from collecting profits in

E)so broad that he fails in distinguishing between selling chair at a pawnshop from the profits in

OA to follow after some discussion ...


The answer should be D.
Correct Idioms:
so [adjective] as to [verb]
distinguish between A and B - in which A and B are parallel
or distinguish A from B - in which A and B are parallel

D uses all of them correctly.
(edited post on observing missing 'between' in 'C'.)
_________________

"Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well."
― Voltaire


Press Kudos, if I have helped.
Thanks!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 116
Premium Member
Re: The income categories of Senator Crocker’s proposed tax code are as br  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Apr 2014, 11:23
1
the correct answer is indeed D
u can distinguish between X and Y
or
u can distinguish X from Y

also X and Y need to be parallel ---->selling an old chair at a pawnshop from collecting profits in
both are simple gerund so that makes them parallel
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2013
Posts: 30
Schools: ISB '16
Re: The income categories of Senator Crocker’s proposed tax code are as br  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Apr 2014, 00:13
Options A & B can be eliminated as the usage "as broad as" is incorrect

Option E doesn't quite complete the comparison

Distinguish X from Y is the right usage hence option D must be the answer.
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1728
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: The income categories of Senator Crocker’s proposed tax code are as br  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jan 2018, 01:09
this question comes from Magoosh.
The question has not tested the idiom "distinguish between...and..." vs "distinguish X from Y". Both idioms are correct; I believe gmat will not test the differences in meaning.
SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1192
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: The income categories of Senator Crocker’s proposed tax code are as br  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2018, 06:51
OE:

Split #1: the idiom "so [adjective] as to" is correct, and the construction "as [adjective] as to" is idiomatically incorrect. Choices (A) & (B) are incorrect on this split, and choices (C) & (D) & (E) are correct.

Split #2: the idiom "fail to" is correct, and the construction "fail in" is incorrect. Choices (B) & (E) are incorrect on this split, and choices (A) & (C) & (D) are correct.

Split #3: there are two acceptable idioms involving the verb "distinguish" — one is "to distinguish P from Q" (choices (A) & (D) have this correct); the other is "to distinguish between P and Q" (no choice has this correct). It is incorrect to use "distinguish between" with "from" (choice (B) & (E) make this mistake) and to use "distinguish" + "and" without the word "between" (choice (C) makes this mistake).

Split #4: Parallel structure! In either of the forms of the "distinguish" idiom, the P and Q must be parallel in structure. Both can be gerunds, "selling" and "collecting" (choice (C) & (D) have this correct). Both can be nouns, "sale" and "profits" — no answer choice has that construction. It violates parallelism to have one gerund and one noun — choices (A) & (B) & (E) make that mistake.

Split #5: only one choice has this issue, but notice the mystery pronoun in (E) — who is the "he" mentioned in this choice?? Senator Crocker's name appears only in the possessive, and on the GMAT, that's not adequate to be the antecedent of a pronoun.

The only possible answer is (D).
_________________

Thanks!
Do give some kudos.

Simple strategy:
“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Want to improve your Score:
GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1| GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2

My Notes:
Reading comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Absolute Phrases

GMAT Club Bot
Re: The income categories of Senator Crocker’s proposed tax code are as br &nbs [#permalink] 14 May 2018, 06:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The income categories of Senator Crocker’s proposed tax code are as br

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.