GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Oct 2019, 06:40

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The Japanese economic model created strong domestic

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4472
Re: The Japanese economic model created strong domestic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Mar 2013, 11:13
gmattokyo wrote:
The Japanese economic model created strong domestic industries through subsidies from its Ministry of Trade and by closing off competitive foreign firms to its domestic market. This strategy promised to help economic growth by incubating domestic industries. New Japanese industries could count on a known local demand and would be protected from competition by tariffs and other barriers. The program could reduce the amount of imports and therefore improve the nation's balance of trade.
Which of the following, based on the passage above, is a weakness in this economic strategy?
A) A protectionist policy will create animosity among other nations.
B) Fast growth of small industries will create a class of millionaires and increase the inequality of income.
C) Subsidies and import constraints keep domestic prices high and impose a burden on consumers.
D) Quotas are more regressive than tariffs.
E) The demand for the products made by the incubated industries would not be known.

Fameatop wrote:
I am not able to understand how come answer is C rather than A. Waiting for your valuable inputs. Regards, Fame

This is a LSAT questions, and these are typically much harder than GMAT CR questions.

According to the argument, Japan has a protectionist policy --- by blocking imports, they hope to give domestic industries a boost. This is an economic strategy --- that is to say, a strategy designed to reach particular economic goals.

(A) might be true. It's certainly true that, if Japan is blocking other products, other nations will not be happy about this. There are many many examples of some countries doing things in their own self-interest that other countries don't like. If this is where it ends --- folks in, say, America or Germany saying, "I don't like the protectionist policies of Japan!" --- well, it's not a nice thing to do, to upset other people, so as a moral or spiritual policy, this might not be a success. But, at the very practical level of economics, if some folks in other countries don't like things, that doesn't necessarily mean they will do anything economic about it. Animosity alone does not necessarily have any economic consequences.
Of course, we could imagine that other nations that have animosity against these Japanese policy might take countermoves (boycott of Japanese good, counter tariffs, etc. etc.) but that's a HUGE assumption that extends well beyond what (A) literally says. (A) just says other countries have animosity --- Japan, via this policy, has made other countries upset. Not a nice thing to do, but not necessarily anything that will have any economic consequences. That's why (A) is not a very cogent answer.

Once again, this is why it's crucial to read the WSJ & The Economist, to develop a real-world sense of what does matter and what doesn't matter. If you don't have this real world sense, a whole bunch of things may seem like they should make a difference, when in fact, they don't where the rubber meets the road.

Does this make sense?

Mike :-)
_________________
Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep


Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 840
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: The Japanese economic model created strong domestic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Mar 2013, 21:24
C seemed to be an out of scope answer.
We need to weaken the economic strategy.
Economic strategy is to give subsidy and close the competitive foreign firms. There is nothing discussed about the burden on the consumer. I think we need to present a flaw of economic strategy in connection to the foreign firms or indigenous industries ...not to the rise in price. Though C is much obvious answer..but i think A is more direct one.
Archit
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1570
Concentration: Finance
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The Japanese economic model created strong domestic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Nov 2013, 08:26
gmattokyo wrote:
The Japanese economic model created strong domestic industries through subsidies from its Ministry of Trade and by closing off competitive foreign firms to its domestic market. This strategy promised to help economic growth by incubating domestic industries. New Japanese industries could count on a known local demand and would be protected from competition by tariffs and other barriers. The program could reduce the amount of imports and therefore improve the nation's balance of trade.
Which of the following, based on the passage above, is a weakness in this economic strategy?

A) A protectionist policy will create animosity among other nations.

B) Fast growth of small industries will create a class of millionaires and increase the inequality of income.

C) Subsidies and import constraints keep domestic prices high and impose a burden on consumers.

D) Quotas are more regressive than tariffs.

E) The demand for the products made by the incubated industries would not be known.


I'm with A. What's the OA?

Cheers!
J :)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Mar 2014
Posts: 83
Re: The Japanese economic model created strong domestic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Apr 2015, 11:32
How does C weakeen that, because of increased prices to consumer, the trade will be imbalanced??
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5917
Re: The Japanese economic model created strong domestic  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2019, 05:28
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The Japanese economic model created strong domestic   [#permalink] 09 Apr 2019, 05:28

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 25 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

The Japanese economic model created strong domestic

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne